4c Hajduk Veljko Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 Thus the R-77 has a longer range then AMRAAM. Maybe under certain conditions, however, it does have a longer range. R77 is over 20 years old design. When you shoot them in a straight line. GGTharos, you believe that the SAM = Speed Bump, I believe that the SAM = Stealth STOP! Both of us have arguments strong enough to make our points. You have your statement in your signature, I have mine at the end of my paragraphs. Reminder: SAM = Stealth STOP! And really, stop that childish behavior already. Believing in a lie won't make it come true. Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
GGTharos Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 Thus the R-77 has a longer range then AMRAAM. Maybe under certain conditions, however, it does have a longer range. R77 is over 20 years old design. In practical usage the R-77 has no advantages over AMRAAM. The new design may have caught up with the 120C at this point. India complained enough about their batch. GGTharos, you believe that the SAM = Speed Bump, No, this is a fact. It isn't even my own statement. I believe that the SAM = Stealth STOP! Both of us have arguments strong enough to make our points. You have your statement in your signature, I have mine at the end of my paragraphs. Reminder: SAM = Stealth STOP! You have yours at the end of your paragraphs only when you respond to me. Quit acting like a child. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Maximus_G Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 SAM = Speed Bump I'm sorry, what's the meaning of this? :)
GGTharos Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 The meaning of it is that a SAM can slow down, but not stop, an attacking air force. Or in other words, you can't control the air with just SAMs, you need aircraft too. Unless your opposition is totally out-matched that is. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
4c Hajduk Veljko Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 In practical usage the R-77 has no advantages over AMRAAM. The new design may have caught up with the 120C at this point.Thanks GG! :) You have yours at the end of your paragraphs only when you respond to me. Quit acting like a child.Because you are the only one having such "interesting" statement in your signature. Reminder SAM = Stealth STOP! Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
Teknetinium Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 I'm more interested of Data link Super ET that goes for heat and visual. 51st PVO Discord SATAC YouTube
Pilotasso Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 R-77 has longer range then AIM120. R-77 has longer range then AIM120. You didnt get it. .
Vault Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 (edited) Both delta and lattice control surfaces have their pro's and con's, if the Russian's utilise delta's on their new R-77 it'll finally put the lattice v's Delta control surface debate to bed. From an aerodynamic POV I personally think deltas are more efficient for a BVR missile, oh well time will tell. Edited August 19, 2009 by Vault [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Kuky Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 I would think delta fins would have more surface area so more drag but also more control when missile is maneuvering. 1 PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
4c Hajduk Veljko Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 You didnt get it.No. you didn't get it. Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
pauldy Posted August 19, 2009 Posted August 19, 2009 Performances aside, wouldn't traditional delta fins be cheaper to produce than Lattice ones? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts