Hammer1-1 Posted yesterday at 04:48 PM Posted yesterday at 04:48 PM (edited) Can we expect the Hornet (and a few other recent out of EA planes) to get a 3D scan and render with quality like the current F-4E and now the Mig-29A? Are there any plans to update these models? Edited yesterday at 04:48 PM by Hammer1-1 1 Intel 13900k @ 5.8ghz | 64gb GSkill Trident Z | MSI z790 Meg ACE | Zotac RTX4090 | Asus 1000w psu | Slaw RX Viper 2 pedals | VPForce Rhino/VKB MCE Ultimate + STECS Mk2 MAX / Virpil MongoosT50+ MongoosT50CM | Virpil TCS+/ AH64D grip/custom AH64D TEDAC | Samsung Odyssey G9 + Odyssey Ark | Next Level Racing Flight Seat Pro | WinWing F-18 MIPS | No more VR for this pilot. My wallpaper and skins On today's episode of "Did You Know", Cessna Skyhawk crashes into cemetery; over 800 found dead as workers keep digging.
Cgjunk2 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Are the F-18 cockpit dimensions known to be inaccurate? I was under the impression it was pretty accurate in that regard. As far as rendering, textures and art looks great to me on the Hornet. The new Fulcrum and Hornet look similar to me, with maybe the Hornet a having slight advantage in clarity and performance (FPS) in VR. Quality is always subjective though, and it’s a balance in terms of ensuring the final product is well optimized. Insane levels of details are not fun if it ends up being a low-fps hog. Case in point, the F5 remaster got the royal treatment in terms of graphics, but the lower frame rates make it less fun to fly. My personal opinion (again, in VR) is that the Hornet is the gold-standard module in terms of cockpit art, quality, and efficiency. I think the Mig29 has come close to matching it. Edited 1 hour ago by Cgjunk2
SuperSSL Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago 17 minutes ago, Cgjunk2 said: Are the F-18 cockpit dimensions known to be inaccurate? I was under the impression it was pretty accurate in that regard. As far as rendering, textures and art looks great to me on the Hornet. The new Fulcrum and Hornet look similar to me, with maybe the Hornet a having slight advantage in clarity and performance (FPS) in VR. Quality is always subjective though, and it’s a balance in terms of ensuring the final product is well optimized. Insane levels of details are not fun if it ends up being a low-fps hog. Case in point, the F5 remaster got the royal treatment in terms of graphics, but the lower frame rates make it less fun to fly. My personal opinion (again, in VR) is that the Hornet is the gold-standard module in terms of cockpit art, quality, and efficiency. I think the Mig29 has come close to matching it. The MiG-29A looks to be significantly higher fidelity than the F/A-18C from everything I've seen. VR is a whole other conversation. There are fidelity and performance issues unique to that interface.
Recommended Posts