About Enigma's "Leaked" Video...

[wilbur81]

After Enigma's (insightful at times) "leaked" video last week: I'd just like to say, DCS still has no rival. It will NEVER be bug free (it is WAY too complex and comprehensive), never. Most of the negative comments about DCS underneath his video are absurd to me. The constant comparison to BMS is mind-boggling. If DCS was an F-22, BMS is a Cessna 152 by comparison. The Dynamic Campaign is really very cool, but you're talking about a platform that had one archaic map and one aircraft. Try pulling that off with 50+ high fidelity aircraft, dozens of different maps, with exceptionally high graphic standards, controllable ground vehicles, and wildly compl....oh, wait. ED is ACTUALLY trying to do just that!

My only real criticism has been that they've spread themselves WAY TOO THIN! But I do not fault them for being ambitious. Have they blundered some 3rd party business? Yes, it is impossible to be a business for decades and not burn a bridge now and again. Can they reconcile those differences? Of course. At the end of the day, DCS is the only air combat simulator right now that is cutting/bleeding edge in my book. Period. Dot. 

Keep up the good work, team.

[freehand]

 I have no idea what you are talking about to be honest.

[waterman]

25 minutes ago, wilbur81 said:

It will NEVER be bug free

They have achieved that very well  

Edited 19 hours ago by waterman

[wilbur81]

1 hour ago, freehand said:

 I have no idea what you are talking about to be honest.

That's fine. You'll find it in your YT algorithm eventually.  

[sirrah]

8 hours ago, wilbur81 said:

After Enigma's (insightful at times) "leaked" video last week: I'd just like to say, DCS still has no rival. It will NEVER be bug free (it is WAY too complex and comprehensive), never. Most of the negative comments about DCS underneath his video are absurd to me. The constant comparison to BMS is mind-boggling. If DCS was an F-22, BMS is a Cessna 152 by comparison. The Dynamic Campaign is really very cool, but you're talking about a platform that had one archaic map and one aircraft. Try pulling that off with 50+ high fidelity aircraft, dozens of different maps, with exceptionally high graphic standards, controllable ground vehicles, and wildly compl....oh, wait. ED is ACTUALLY trying to do just that!

My only real criticism has been that they've spread themselves WAY TOO THIN! But I do not fault them for being ambitious. Have they blundered some 3rd party business? Yes, it is impossible to be a business for decades and not burn a bridge now and again. Can they reconcile those differences? Of course. At the end of the day, DCS is the only air combat simulator right now that is cutting/bleeding edge in my book. Period. Dot. 

Keep up the good work, team.

If you're referring to the YT video I'm guessing you are..

Without diving into the actual "discussion", or I'd rather say "reactions" from the community (which for obvious reasons will probably not be allowed on this forum); from what I've observed and without judging, the general consensus in reactions of the community after seeing this leaked video, are definitely not complaints about bugs or comparisons with BMS 

 

But until someone dares to post a link here to said YT video (I don't ) it's unsure if we are talking about the same video.

(My expectations are, that this thread won't have a long life )

Edited 12 hours ago by sirrah

[wilbur81]

6 hours ago, sirrah said:

(My expectations are, that this thread won't have a long life )

This thread doesn't need to be any longer than one single post...my original post. I'm not inviting discussion, I'm planting a flag.