Jump to content

Suggestion: F-4N Phantom as the next Navy variant (covers F-4B + F-4N)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello Heatblur team,
First, thank you for the outstanding F-4E module, the quality sets a new benchmark in DCS.

I would like to propose the F-4N Phantom as the next Navy variant in the Phantom family.

The F-4N provides several major advantages:

  1. Dual-era coverage

    • Because the F-4N is an upgraded F-4B, a single module can cover both:

      • Vietnam-era F-4B (1965–1972)

      • Post-Vietnam fleet defense F-4N (1973–1980)

  2. Lower development overhead

    • Same basic airframe as F-4B

    • Minimal structural changes

    • Avionics upgrades easier to model compared to the F-4J or F-4S

    • Reuses more of the F-4E code and cockpit framework

  3. High gameplay value

    • Supports Vietnam carriers, early AAW doctrines, MiG engagements

    • Enables Cold War Mediterranean and Atlantic intercept scenarios

    • Bridges the historical gap between F-4B and F-4S

  4. Perfect pairing with Heatblur’s design philosophy

    • Historical authenticity

    • High-fidelity ECM/RWR modeling

    • Navy carrier operations

The F-4N is a uniquely efficient and valuable choice: one module, two eras, strong community appeal, and development practicality.

Thank you for considering this suggestion.
Many of us would be extremely excited to see a Navy Phantom, and the F-4N seems to be the ideal candidate.

Posted (edited)

Heatblur, has planned on a F-4 Naval version.


Q: Will there be a Navy F-4?
A: Yes! Our Phantom journey only begins with the -E. However, owing to the complexity of the work and investment of time and effort, it will not be included in the DCS: F-4E product. We’re instead choosing to focus on providing the most content rich F-4E we possibly can, and then set our sights on further telling the legendary story of the F-4.

Last Heatblur Interview:


 

Edited by Silver_Dragon

For Work / Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / 2xMDF

Missing modules:
Mig-29A / C-130J / F4UD-1 / F-5E Remastered / OH-58D / CH-47F / F-16C / F-14 / Mi-24P / JF-17 / Fw-190 A-8 / I-16 / CE-2 / Yak-52 / FC2024
Cold War Germany / Afganistan / Iraq

Posted
5 minutes ago, Silver_Dragon said:

Heatblur, has planned on a F-4 Naval version.


Q: Will there be a Navy F-4?
A: Yes! Our Phantom journey only begins with the -E. However, owing to the complexity of the work and investment of time and effort, it will not be included in the DCS: F-4E product. We’re instead choosing to focus on providing the most content rich F-4E we possibly can, and then set our sights on further telling the legendary story of the F-4.

That is why I would like to suggest the version of the naval Phantom...

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jazz0611 said:

That is why I would like to suggest the version of the naval Phantom...

Heatblur has confirmed a B/N, but has a future project.

For Work / Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / 2xMDF

Missing modules:
Mig-29A / C-130J / F4UD-1 / F-5E Remastered / OH-58D / CH-47F / F-16C / F-14 / Mi-24P / JF-17 / Fw-190 A-8 / I-16 / CE-2 / Yak-52 / FC2024
Cold War Germany / Afganistan / Iraq

Posted

I'd far prefer a J or an S over a B or an N.  The pulse doppler radar, the longer service life and the greater commonality with the RAF Phantoms all sway me in that direction.  But different things will appeal to different people.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...