Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I received a little mail yesterday and almost trashed it as SPAM but it turned out to be a Thrustmaster Cougar Survey.

For Cougar owners who didn't receive this, take a look here:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=a3kwr%2bCHLx26C7Zs%2b70tqF60%2fgFnBk9tSvq05cqC72s%3d&

Win11 Pro 64-bit, Ryzen 5800X3D, Corsair H115i, Gigabyte X570S UD, EVGA 3080Ti XC3 Ultra 12GB, 64 GB DDR4 G.Skill 3600. Monitors: LG 27GL850-B27 2560x1440 + Samsung SyncMaster 2443 1920x1200, HOTAS: Warthog with Virpil WarBRD base, MFG Crosswind pedals, TrackIR4, Rift-S, Elgato Streamdeck XL.

Personal Wish List: A6 Intruder, Vietnam theater, decent ATC module, better VR performance!

Posted

Survey done.

Even if i like very much Saitek SST software, i like even more Foxy flexibility, and i prefer one thousend times keep the features and flexibilty of Foxy to the more direct and simple aproach of SST from Saitek.

Posted

Foxy is a nice app but its not really much of a GUI and not that user friendly. Foxy has far too many windows, buttons and other things cluttering things up. Every other manufacturer such as CH Products, Logitech and Saitek offer a more graphic straight forward GUI depicting the product you are using and CH Products Control Manager proves you can have that GUI and still perform very complex scripting some of which even the Cougar is not capable of. A lot of users are happy with that as like me they used to program Thrustmaster gear in DOS but times have moved on. You can keep the complexity of Foxy as it is now but make the interface a lot more simple for beginners to use and just for every day programming where you may only need to map a single keystroke.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...