159_Archer Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Is it correct that the '33 can no longer carry this weapon in FC2? I thought in RL they were able to do so; shame if we have lost this facility -the 159th made some use of it! We'll just have to go back to the anti-shipping drawing board...:book::pilotfly: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 159th Guards Aviation Regiment; recruiting now! http://www.159thgar.com/ We now fly all modern Jets and Helos
Boberro Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 No Su-33 and Kh-41 is completely fictional. In real life it doesn't have avionics to use it. It could carry it only as static model eheeh :D Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
Robin_Hood Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Should be possible to carry a mock-up Kh-41 :megalol: Anyway, Su-33 is practically fictional already :music_whistling: 2nd French Fighter Squadron
159th_Royalman Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Anyway, Su-33 is practically fictional already :music_whistling: Care to explain that? 159th Guards Aviation Regiment | We fly Su33 - Su25T - Ka50 :pilotfly:
Robin_Hood Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Just kidding, because the Su-33 is seeing very limited service ;) 2nd French Fighter Squadron
159th_Jojo Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 The Chinese are looking into acquiring Su33s for their new Carrier. 1
Avimimus Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Can't the Su-33 gain a limited anti-shipping capability using the Kopyo pod?
S77th-konkussion Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Even if it posessed the avionics it's just impractical. That missile belongs on a Bear or something.. Still was kind of fun though... [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC]
S77th-konkussion Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 The Chinese are looking into acquiring Su33s for their new Carrier. I don't know the gory details of the relational / comparative history of the 33 vs the 29K but isn't the 29K quite a bit more modern and up to speed? More serviceable? I'm sure they say they're looking at it- due dilligence. But would they really buy it? Certainly not anything resembling the LOMAC model. The 33 is stuck in the 70's.. All it needs is a tie-dye paint job, and peace signs on the V-STABS Don't freak. For LOMAC purposes- I spend almost ALL my fighter time in the 33. Ask anyone. :D [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC]
Grimes Posted April 11, 2010 Posted April 11, 2010 (edited) Thats a shame. I gotta wonder if its possible to modify the mission text file and put the KH-41 on a Su-33 via CLSID so its built into the mission itself. If the missile is still functional I might consider doing that for a co-op or something. I remember a while back I played a co-op that put a pair of Kh-31s on the Su-33, and it worked the same as the Kh-41. Ok editing the mission text file works. I didn't look for the Kh-41 CLSID since no aircraft can equip it anymore so I put a pair of Kh-31s onboard. I can't get a targeting diamond to show up though. But the old procedure of going to A2G mode and turning the radar on worked... just need that target diamond. Edited April 11, 2010 by Grimes The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
159th_Jojo Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I want my Kh 41 back. OK so it's not really in use, but that applies to the Su25T and the KA50 is all but dead. So can we suspend reality a bit for the sake of some fun guys. There's always a compromise between reality and gameplay / enjoyment. If we were reality freeks most of us wouldn't be in the cockpit at all. :cry:
GGTharos Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 Not only is the Kh-41 not in use, but AFAIK it was never even test-fired from a Su-33. This capability is not even 'limited numbers', it is entirely fictional. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
HungaroJET Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 Not only is the Kh-41 not in use, but AFAIK it was never even test-fired from a Su-33. This capability is not even 'limited numbers', it is entirely fictional. Just like Kh-25ML on Ka-50 ? :smilewink: So, please give us Kh-41 back on Su-33 & MiG-29K :P Just for fun...just for fictional fun :) Atop the midnight tarmac, a metal beast awaits. To be flown below the radar, to bring the enemy his fate. HAVE A BANDIT DAY ! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." - R. Buckminster Fuller (1895 - 1983), American Architect, Author, Designer, Inventor, and Futurist
Grimes Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 GG... if you put the missile onboard the aircraft anyway is the code there to allow it to work? The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
GGTharos Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I don't know the answer to that ... yes/no ... as in, you can make it work with a little effort I suspect. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
159th_Viper Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 Who do we formally petition to get the Moskit reintegrated into FC2? Have to witness the sight/sound of a squadron of 33's launching Moskit's with Toads in SEAD support to appreciate - really adds a lot, notwithstanding it's fictional nature. Has to be a way, surely..... :) Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
GGTharos Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I'll bring it up, maybe the devs will decide to put it back in. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Grimes Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I don't know the answer to that ... yes/no ... as in, you can make it work with a little effort I suspect. Its possible to put anything on the aircraft. I put a pair of Kh-31's onboard the Su-33 by modifying its payload directly in the miz file via a text editor. I couldnt fire though since I had no target diamond. The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
159th_Viper Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 I'll bring it up, maybe the devs will decide to put it back in. Appreciated - Ta :) Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
GGTharos Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 Did you try assigning targets to your planes? Its possible to put anything on the aircraft. I put a pair of Kh-31's onboard the Su-33 by modifying its payload directly in the miz file via a text editor. I couldnt fire though since I had no target diamond. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Grimes Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 The target was inside of the a targeting area... I'll do some testing with the A-10 to see what it takes to have the diamond show up... I'll also search for the proper Kh-41 CLSID The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
Grimes Posted April 12, 2010 Posted April 12, 2010 You need AI to spot the target first... I could only get it to work with mudspikes. But the missile does launch :D The right man in the wrong place makes all the difference in the world. Current Projects: Grayflag Server, Scripting Wiki Useful Links: Mission Scripting Tools MIST-(GitHub) MIST-(Thread) SLMOD, Wiki wishlist, Mission Editing Wiki!, Mission Building Forum
Avimimus Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 I'll bring it up, maybe the devs will decide to put it back in. Wouldn't a subsonic anti-shipping missile make more sense (or a Kh-31)? I'd personally much rather have a LAU-68 (who needs extra ammunition?) or a KAB-500L...
Rhinox Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 Not only is the Kh-41 not in use, but AFAIK it was never even test-fired from a Su-33. This capability is not even 'limited numbers', it is entirely fictional. Hm, this looks to me too real for "entirely fictional" weapon... http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Maritime-Flanker-D.html
GGTharos Posted April 13, 2010 Posted April 13, 2010 It is certainly a good looking mock-up ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Recommended Posts