Reality in FC2

[Pirke77]

This is very funny and make this simulator to be ARCADE GAME :(

mig29a bez krila.rar

[EtherealN]

Tell me more before I spend the time? ;)

[Pirke77]

ok

for all this years i make testing in BS ( http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=56997) and FC2 and i was come to very strange results. that i was get is unbelievable in real life. i fly military planes and military helicopters in real life and believe me what i test in DCS is for NASA scientists . you can see my previous post in BS forum for helicopters auto rotations and here for some plane emergency situations.

some test in both games was passed but some didnt :(

i love hard core simulators but when i see this i was very disappointed :(

in this last test i break Mig29a both wings on runway and made great takeoff,flight and landing :) I say this is very funny and make this simulator ARCADE GAME :(

Edited December 20, 2010 by Pirke77

[EtherealN]

Known.

 

And yes, FC2 uses a simplified "table" style flight model (excepting Su-25). Wait for DCS:MiG29 Fulcrum for an AFM simulation of that airframe.

[Vecko]

 

Wait for DCS:MiG29 Fulcrum for an AFM simulation of that airframe.

 

AHA!Info?:clap_2:

Edited December 20, 2010 by Vecko

[Pirke77]

Known.

 

And yes, FC2 uses a simplified "table" style flight model (excepting Su-25). Wait for DCS:MiG29 Fulcrum for an AFM simulation of that airframe.

 

the same is with su25t and all planes :(

 

and in A-10 DCS is same thing :(

su25t no wings.rar

Edited December 20, 2010 by Pirke77

[4cKljun]

Wait for DCS:MiG29 Fulcrum for an AFM simulation of that airframe.

 

 

This is the best thing I read on this forum. I hope you are seriously considering and working on this project.

[RIPTIDE]

AHA!Info?:clap_2:

2052...

[Henchman14]

AHA!Info?:clap_2:

 

Ditto! Mig29 would be awesome!

[141st_Eko1]

Known.

Wait for DCS:MiG29 Fulcrum for an AFM simulation of that airframe.

 

 

I hope you are seriously considering and working on this project.

 

I hope too.

Edited December 21, 2010 by 141st_Eko1

[Boberro]

Don't know why you are so excited. It is obvious SOMEDAY in DCS there will be MiG-29, F-16, F-15, Su-27... what is so exciting in old news?

[Vecko]

Probably is misunderstanding but who cares... We can celebrate for one day!:D MIGS STRONG! :D

Edited December 21, 2010 by Vecko

[flydragon126]

flying with both main wings broken is possible in reality, just the handling should be nearly impossible to do.

in a game, damages on both sides are symmetrical and there is no random debris hanging around, so handling is much easier in a game than in reality.

[rattler]

I would say damage like that the plane should at least explode, not fly. I agree. This should be fixed. I know it's a simulator but gees, lets have some reality.:doh:

[59th_Buncsi]

WOHH This is the best topic if its true :D

signature :D:D:D

But not after im over 70 years...

[Boberro]

Buncsi, if you were seventy, you would get more time for playing. It does have many pluses :D

 

BTW, MiG-29A will have rather short life in F-16, F-15 meet :P

[59th_Buncsi]

Well the A version is already everywhere out of service... So there are only a few things what we dont know not like the F-15/6 those are still in service with a lot of military secret...

[59th_Buncsi]

Ahh and i forgot. Those country which use the 29A are on the way to modernize them... (example: Poland - you should know it :) and Bulgaria also)

[rattler]

I guess there are no military secrets left for the A-10?/ Hmmmm.

[59th_Buncsi]

Thats why was it a bad choice :D

[Pirke77]

BTW, MiG-29A will have rather short life in F-16, F-15 meet :P

 

in close fight guns only Mig29a with good pilot is deadly machine.

in close fight only pilot skill is important factor for win :thumbup:

 

i will not discus BVR fight because Mig29a dont have chance at all :(

we have real situation in NATO aggression against my country 1999.

 

S!

[59th_Buncsi]

I agree with you Pirke, but close air combat isnt today with these equipments...

[141st_Eko1]

I prefer MiG-29SMT than Mig29A :)

[59th_Buncsi]

Wont be bad, but thats still in service and still under construction, and i don't think we will get the same if they try to model the SMT... (example: monitors and the functions not publicized...)

[59th_Buncsi]

But the best should be: MiG-29A/C/UB/SMT in 1 DCS :D