Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Will we see the hawg make use of this weapon of choice? I'm not sure if it is already included?

 

I'm sure it could be tied into the targetting pod somehow.. Wonder how they do it in real life.. I know the A10's in real life have carried them..

---

May your takeoffs equal your landings!

Posted
Que? Does the a-10 carry those? I doubt it

 

According to wikipedia they do.. I'll look a little closer. Not sure about the c version

---

May your takeoffs equal your landings!

Posted (edited)

The HARM? I don't think that capability is in service.. I'm not sure that that missile really fits into the A10's doctrine. Even if the avionics could be carried... which I do not think is plausible even in a self contained pod. I don't know if anyone wants to put an A10 into that kind of risk given it's speed, etc.. HARM does not have unlimited range. I mean you gotta get kind of up in there- and then be able to get out quickly if things get bad...

 

 

Doesn't mean there isn't some skunkworx-type mad scientist giving it a try, though... :D

Edited by S77th-konkussion
Posted

guys, how can we learn which ammunitions can be carried by a-10 in dcs a-10 game?

FC3 | UH-1 | Mi-8 | A-10C II | F/A-18 | Ka-50 III | F-14 | F-16 | AH-64 Mi-24 | F-5 | F-15EF-4| Tornado

Persian Gulf | Nevada | Syria | NS-430 | Supercarrier // Wishlist: CH-53 | UH-60

 

Youtube

MS FFB2 - TM Warthog - CH Pro Pedals - Trackir 5

Posted
According to wikipedia they do.. I'll look a little closer. Not sure about the c version

 

I take it back, I saw it used in reference with the text close together (cached copy) of a couple websites. When I searched for info on it,some of the text looked like it said it carried it but when you actually went into the page it separated the text and made references to other platforms.

---

May your takeoffs equal your landings!

Posted
The HARM? I don't think that capability is in service.. I'm not sure that that missile really fits into the A10's doctrine. Even if the avionics could be carried... which I do not think is plausible even in a self contained pod. I don't know if anyone wants to put an A10 into that kind of risk given it's speed, etc.. HARM does not have unlimited range. I mean you gotta get kind of up in there- and then be able to get out quickly if things get bad...

 

 

Doesn't mean there isn't some skunkworx-type mad scientist giving it a try, though... :D

 

 

I think its plausible but they are pretty long. They go up to high alts and loiter and wait for the radar to turn back on etc. It is just a littl elong for the pylons I think..

---

May your takeoffs equal your landings!

Posted (edited)

A-10 has never carried AGM-88 nor does it currently has the capability AFAIK. I don't think the Pilots would be qualified to employ them. Not sure if this would be added in the future. The aircraft is to low to effectively serve as a SEAD/DEAD. The F-16CJ, EA-6 and EA-18 would be better suited for that tasking. Just my opinion.

Edited by mvsgas

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Posted
I think its plausible but they are pretty long. They go up to high alts and loiter and wait for the radar to turn back on etc. It is just a littl elong for the pylons I think..

 

This is incorrect, you may be mistaking AGM-88 with ALARM missiles maybe?

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Posted
guys, how can we learn which ammunitions can be carried by a-10 in dcs a-10 game?

 

Where is Mower when you need him :D

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Posted

Plus- the rack itself may or may not be compatible anyway. I don't know this-

 

 

edit heh... This Raytheon Sheet sort of implies simplicity..

 

http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/stellent/groups/public/documents/content/cms04_016401.pdf

 

 

 

Yeah, bubba. This supersonic suppository practically fires itself! Use the screens you got- just chuck in one of them CLC gadgets an git r dun!!

Posted

By looking in the DCS: A-10C mission editor ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted

The A-10 is not a good platform for HARM. It would at best be engaging SA-15 or SA-8 in most cases, and giving up at least one pylon for an 800lb missile that is useless against its more likely threats and primary targets. There's no point in equipping this weapon - you just call in the wild weasels.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted
This is incorrect, you may be mistaking AGM-88 with ALARM missiles maybe?

 

Yeah, ALARM.

 

Too bad we never got TACIT RAINBOW operational.

"Tank! I need a program for a TM Warthog!"

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Virtual Thunderbirds, LLC | Sponsored by Thrustmaster

 

Thermaltake V9 SECC case | Corsair RM750 PSU | Asus ROG Ranger VIII | Intel i7 6700K | 16GB 3000mhz RAM |

EVGA GTX 980Ti FTW | TrackIR 4 w/ pro clip | TM HOTAS Warthog | TM MFD Cougar Pack | Win 10 x64 |

Posted

I don't remember that, but it is possible. There was a smaller ARM too, the AGM-122 (IIRC!) which was basically a sidewinder with a radar-homing seeker. It turned out to be very limited in its use so after about 700 were produced, they were canceled.

 

I seem to remember GG (prepared to be corrected!) mentioning once that they were trialed but never put into service with the A10?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted

No, the AGM-88 requires a radar to be operated by the offending platform, not the offended, AGM-88 armed platform. ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted

You need communication from the RWR to the HARM, and to the Jammer (you won't want that jammer operating when you're shooting I think). You need communication from the missile to the aircraft as well.

 

This will allow you to operate all of the HARMs modes - pre-briefed, self-protection, target of opportunity and harm-as-sensor, albeit probably at degraded capability without specialized radar detection equipment.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted

Gulf War friendly fire incident

 

During the Gulf War, the HARM was involved in a friendly fire incident when the pilot of an F-4G Wild Weasel escorting a B-52 mistook the latter's tail gun radar for an Iraqi AAA site. (This was after the tail gunner of the B-52 had targeted the F-4G, mistaking it for an Iraqi MiG). The pilot launched the missile and then saw that the target was the B-52, which was hit. It survived with shrapnel damage to the tail. The B-52 was subsequently renamed "In HARM’s Way".[5]

---

May your takeoffs equal your landings!

Posted
I never realized Aragorn was active service.

 

LOL. :megalol:

Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two.

Come let's eat grandpa!

Use punctuation, save lives!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...