DVADR Control Pannel Implement

[RglsPhoto]

Sorry if other guys have listed this.

 

I know the DVADR pannel is clickable since versoin 0.9.But it dosen't record the data as

in RL.I also know recording the video in game will reduce fps.

 

So,why does it just generate a read-only track file(which means this track file can't not be modify when it is replayed),with the view is set automatically like a real record.

 

I don't know if this is easy to achieve，anyway,this should be a cool features.

Edited November 26, 2011 by RglsPhoto

[Eddie]

TacView.

[Demongornot]

TacView.

 

Yeah but no...

The DVADR record VIDEO and not Data.

The Airborn Mission Recorders VS1500 record Data AND Video

 

And TacView is nice but its not free.

Just make an auto generation of AVI video from real camera angle (hud, gun) not when we flight but after, at the end of the mission, like we actually have option for replay, an option for generate HD recording data and why not create too a Data file that can only be read by TacView cause we can ask for implement a basic 3D data view like Falcon 4 we never will have it, the thing same for every wish, until community created itself everything we wait since several years and that ED never will do it...

 

If ED don't have time or don't want to make it, they must give us an SDK !!!

 

+1 RglsPhoto

[sobek]

And TacView is nice but its not free.

 

Yes it is...

 

Just make an auto generation of AVI video from real camera angle (hud, gun) not when we flight but after, at the end of the mission

 

There is a track to AVI rendering feature that is implemented in the sim.

[Demongornot]

I have download it just for testing and its was written : evaluation version 30 day left...

I have try it again just right now i can continue to use it but it ask me a serial on starting...

 

An yes i know but its not the same thing than a hud/gun view

I talk about implement the same AVI rending but commanded by action on DVADR in game with limited camera (we can't move or zoom it) like the onboard camera of the real A10...

Anyways its better to integrate a 3D replay like Falcon or other, that can give graphic engine to laucher for 3D mission editor and 3D library and payload screen...

If the real A10 do that a simulator must do that too, if people who pay for this simulation want to do it its better to give ut the possibility...

DCS need a lot of things...

[Olgerd]

If the real A10 do that a simulator must do that too, if people who pay for this simulation want to do it its better to give ut the possibility...

DCS need a lot of things...

 

It is nice-to-have feature. If we will have time we probably will implement this. But no promises.

[sobek]

I have download it just for testing and its was written : evaluation version 30 day left...

I have try it again just right now i can continue to use it but it ask me a serial on starting...

 

There are features that you have to pay for to use, the basic features are free.

[cichlidfan]

I have download it just for testing and its was written : evaluation version 30 day left...

I have try it again just right now i can continue to use it but it ask me a serial on starting...

 

 

If you actually read the information on the TacView site you would see what is free and what is not. I have been using Tacview since March and have never registered, paid or used a serial number.:noexpression:

[Demongornot]

It is nice-to-have feature. If we will have time we probably will implement this. But no promises.

 

Its nice, thanks you, but i think the most important things that ED must do its a SDK (Software Development Kit), a lot of people in simulation community make incredible addons like that : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV2JTnvbxnc

or like that

or for graphic like that (its exactly what a lot of people want to have in this simulation) : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8scXSG3hF3Y and more and more and when the graphic engine will be more optimized with graphic card (cause actually in DCS my computor don't work over 50% (i talk aout everything: cpu, memory, gpu, graphic memory, HDD) and i have low FPS with good config and its the same for everyone) and when crossfire/SLI will working (actually when i turn on my CF fps its divided by 2) we can be able to have the same graphic than what we see on Grandsurf video everywhere on the map without lagging...

Same thing for AI http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=81295 , adding effect (like explosion smoke and more), ground crew with a lot of animation same for boat and carrier (and if the next aircraft its an Hornet that will be really better to adding crew with nice animation made by fan and more live on airport)

, adding sound for a lot of thing actually missing, give more real things that we don't have for the moment and that ED never will have the time to do, adding new map and why not on day have a complete earth (i prefer loose 20Go of my HDD and have a better simulator)

And adding more units and more and more and more things...

Look how many addons FSX have, and some payware can give money to ED with original software right, and compare original FSX and the same with addons (like animation, AI/flyable airplane, extreme flyable airplane like PMDG or VSR, new carrier and more).

More things can be adding for military version cause ED will have the time to concentrate only to the more important things without lets the community wait a lot of things, we can do it ourselves and give more commercial argument to the civil simulator cause a lot of community addon can be officially adding by ED to DCS series.

And with the combined arms community just need to make it only one time and with the possibility to embody JTAC and commander new "playable" ground unit can be adding.

 

And if ED want to make something but without the time to do they can ask help to the sim community without need to pay us...

Make a contest and the best addon will be adding with why not possibility to modified it with every good things from other addon of the contest.

Please ED give us the possibility to help you and to make together a fantastic simulator !!!

[Olgerd]

Initially Lockon was not designed as an SDK. That is why can't 'just give' SDK. We have to create it. Partially it already exists, but more have to be done to make a complete thing.

[Demongornot]

Initially Lockon was not designed as an SDK. That is why can't 'just give' SDK. We have to create it. Partially it already exists, but more have to be done to make a complete thing.

 

Yes i know, and make it will do loose time, but after its not the number of people of ED team who will work on this simulator, but every one who have minimal knowledge and free time for help ED will work and maybe finally can help for the same initial work more faster and after the gain of addons and new things will really be positifs, and i think more faster that can be done, better the final result will be...

I think its like have 3 or 4 time the number of people working on this simulator without need to pay them.

For example, ED would not have needed to make the New E3A and other new 3D model, maybe community would already do that or ED just have to ask to the community to do it, ED just have after to correct fly model for example for adding aircraft and just correct it need little time, its nothing compare to fully do it...

 

And if it already exists partially, its what ED team use, make SDK for community will not take so extremely long time.