GodsPrototype Posted April 22, 2013 Posted April 22, 2013 I'm looking to buy a new GPU and CPU. Currently, I have a 6870 and a i7-870. I want to upgrade both, but i'm not sure if I should get Nvidia or ATI for my card, and what CPU to take with that GPU. I have a 3 monitor setup, all 1920x1080. I can play in eyefinity in FSX and DCS, but the smoke etc. really slows it down. Usually I play on one screen, but even on one screen, the smoke slows it down a lot. Any suggestion on what CPU and GPU to upgrade to? PS, I don't have lots of money. I will probably upgrade in the summer, and I will have around the 1000 euros to spend on an upgrade. Thank you. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Sorin Posted April 22, 2013 Posted April 22, 2013 Your hardware is good enough and the smoke problem will be fixed probably in 1.2.4. Have you overclocked the CPU? But if you have the $$$ go for an i7 3770K and a GTX680.
GodsPrototype Posted April 22, 2013 Author Posted April 22, 2013 Your hardware is good enough and the smoke problem will be fixed probably in 1.2.4. Have you overclocked the CPU? But if you have the $$$ go for an i7 3770K and a GTX680. Ok. Why should I not get a i7 2700K. I heard that one is pretty good as well. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Paganus Posted April 22, 2013 Posted April 22, 2013 I7-870 -> 2770K is a 1 generation jump. I7-870 -> 3770K is a 2 generation jump. Each generation is about a 7% - 13% increase depending on several variables. In June the next generation hits which will cause a price drop on the previous generations. My advice is dont consider a CPU upgrade until then. It's only 2 months and you have pretty good hardware already. If you want to go with the 4770K when it hits you will want a new main board anyway. Otherwise you can jump to the 3770K at a lower price. Who knows where the video card market will be by then. It changes so fast. I've always been an Nvidia user myself but I'm making the switch next time I upgrade.
Sorin Posted April 22, 2013 Posted April 22, 2013 i7 2700K is good as well but requires a new motherboard. i7 870 has a LGA1156 socket while the 2700K has LGA1155. I have a very old Intel Q9450 overclocked at 3.9 GHz and it works for me. Your 870 is faster than mine if you overclock it. Probably I will upgrade at the end of the year when Intel will release the next generation i7. What I am saying is "upgrade seldom, but go big".
Sorin Posted April 22, 2013 Posted April 22, 2013 Otherwise you can jump to the 3770K at a lower price. i7 3770K will not work with his current motherboard because it requires FCLGA1155 socket.
GodsPrototype Posted April 22, 2013 Author Posted April 22, 2013 I7-870 -> 2770K is a 1 generation jump. I7-870 -> 3770K is a 2 generation jump. Each generation is about a 7% - 13% increase depending on several variables. In June the next generation hits which will cause a price drop on the previous generations. My advice is dont consider a CPU upgrade until then. It's only 2 months and you have pretty good hardware already. If you want to go with the 4770K when it hits you will want a new main board anyway. Otherwise you can jump to the 3770K at a lower price. Who knows where the video card market will be by then. It changes so fast. I've always been an Nvidia user myself but I'm making the switch next time I upgrade. One of the reasons I am upgrading in the summer is because the new Haswell CPU's. Plus, the 8000 HD series of ATI is coming. I am not saying I will get those, but like you mentioned, the price of previous gens will drop. That's what I am aiming for. I also heard recently that the GTX 700 series is just around the corner. I have considered getting the i7-3770K and the Sapphire 7950 OC 3gb. However, now I am also considering getting Nvidia. I am very interested in getting the GTX 680 now, because I have heard so many positive things about it. I just prefer ATI myself because, from what I've heard (from LinusTechTips) is that multimonitor support is better with ATI GPU's because they've had more experience with their eyefinity. I am almost certain I will get a i7-3770K, but I am still uncertain about what GPU to get. Here's the deal, I do play FSX once in a while, but only for carrier ops in the F/A-18. And now that the F/A-18C by ED is going to be released, I will probably not even use FSX anymore. I am mentioning this because Nvidia has much better support and performance in FSX than ATI. Someone, persuade me! Tell me what GPU you would get in my situation. Thank you! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
jctrnacty Posted April 22, 2013 Posted April 22, 2013 well i had the same dilemma as you,finally i bought msi Z77 m power(best mobo i ve ever had) and 3570K i5 - better for overclocking than 3770, GPu is 7950 gigabyte (again great choice , low temperatures, 1GHz) i am running 4,5 GHz on air, and no problem. [sigpic][/sigpic] MB MSI x570 Prestige Creation, RYzen 9 3900X, 32 Gb Ram 3333MHz, cooler Dark rock PRO 4, eVGA 1080Ti, 32 inch BenQ 32011pt, saitek X52Pro, HP Reverb, win 10 64bit
GodsPrototype Posted April 23, 2013 Author Posted April 23, 2013 well i had the same dilemma as you,finally i bought msi Z77 m power(best mobo i ve ever had) and 3570K i5 - better for overclocking than 3770, GPu is 7950 gigabyte (again great choice , low temperatures, 1GHz) i am running 4,5 GHz on air, and no problem. I don't overclock. I tried overclocking my CPU, even a little bit, from 2.93 Ghz to 3.1 Ghz, and my computer crashed each time. And I have a pretty good fan, a CM Hyper 412S. Maybe it's my motherboard, cause it isn't a overclock motherboard. The only part I was able to overclock successfully was my GPU, but I hardly noticed a performance increase. I will stay at the standard clock. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
sobek Posted April 23, 2013 Posted April 23, 2013 I don't overclock. I tried overclocking my CPU, even a little bit, from 2.93 Ghz to 3.1 Ghz, and my computer crashed each time. And I have a pretty good fan, a CM Hyper 412S. Maybe it's my motherboard, cause it isn't a overclock motherboard. The only part I was able to overclock successfully was my GPU, but I hardly noticed a performance increase. I will stay at the standard clock. Erm, just to be sure, did you try to adjust the B-Clock? If so then that is the reason why your computer crashed. Nowadays you overclock by adjusting the multiplier of a component, not the B-Clock that drives *everything*. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Cedaway Posted April 23, 2013 Posted April 23, 2013 An overclock guide if necessary. I deny any responsibility if you burn your rig ;) DCS Wish: Turbulences affecting surrounding aircraft... [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - Intel Core i5 6600K - 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming - 8 Go - 2 x SSD Crucial MX300 - 750 Go RAID0 - Screens: HP OMEN 32'' 2560x1440 + Oculus Rift CV1 - Win 10 - 64bits - TM WARTHOG #889 - Saitek Pro Rudder.
GodsPrototype Posted April 23, 2013 Author Posted April 23, 2013 An overclock guide if necessary. I deny any responsibility if you burn your rig ;) Yeah it was a while ago when I tried, and I read multiple guides. Unfortunately, I couldn't overclock it the slightest bit. And all I had was a multiplier [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
EtherealN Posted April 23, 2013 Posted April 23, 2013 Erm, just to be sure, did you try to adjust the B-Clock? If so then that is the reason why your computer crashed. Nowadays you overclock by adjusting the multiplier of a component, not the B-Clock that drives *everything*. First-gen i7's are an exception here though, they still used the "old" bClk method. However, adjusting RAM multiplier (or unlinking it) was still necessary to avoid "fun" things happening. Instability at such modest overclocks is most likely down to either the CPU itself being semi-broken (every single CPU will have different performance due to imperfections in the manufacturing process), but given the smallness of that overclock it really ought to be either incorrect configuration for the overclock, or that the motherboard itself is not up for it. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
GodsPrototype Posted April 24, 2013 Author Posted April 24, 2013 Your hardware is good enough and the smoke problem will be fixed probably in 1.2.4. I just noticed what you actually said there. Are you saying that the lagging when smoke is in your vision, is a bug or a problem? I thought that it was just very heavy on the computer, so I needed to upgrade. Could you please clarify? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Sorin Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 I just noticed what you actually said there. Are you saying that the lagging when smoke is in your vision, is a bug or a problem? I thought that it was just very heavy on the computer, so I needed to upgrade. Could you please clarify? The "smoke bug" is acknowledged and ED will probably fix it in 1.2.4. Try some searches in the forum for more information.
Paganus Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 From the DCS 1.2.4 Preliminary Change Log Adjusted framerate impact of smoke from burning aircraft. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=104326
sobek Posted April 24, 2013 Posted April 24, 2013 First-gen i7's are an exception here though, they still used the "old" bClk method. However, adjusting RAM multiplier (or unlinking it) was still necessary to avoid "fun" things happening. You're right, i forgot that was introduced with sandy bridge. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Recommended Posts