Galaad Posted March 30, 2006 Posted March 30, 2006 Um, no, that's definitely -not- correct. A sim can have both quality and a good number of flyables. A jet Sim??? An exemple please.. is a little time to customize the parameters for each aircraft properly. Ie. AFM, NAV and RADAR modes, LOL, I hope it's a joke
GGTharos Posted March 30, 2006 Posted March 30, 2006 No, it isn't a joke ... it's modular and reusable programming. ;) Why owuld you -HOPE- that it's a joke? You got something against a good technology basis or ED's products? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Galaad Posted March 30, 2006 Posted March 30, 2006 You dont give me an exemple.. No, it isn't a joke ... it's modular and reusable programming. ;) LOL, they are the basis of the programming. Why owuld you -HOPE- that it's a joke? You got something against a good technology basis or ED's products? Absolutely no. why do you think that?
GGTharos Posted March 30, 2006 Posted March 30, 2006 You said you hope its a joke ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Galaad Posted March 30, 2006 Posted March 30, 2006 You said you hope its a joke ;) Yes, because a programmer is not a magician. Even with the technology, it take big time to developpe with accuracy an aircraft (AFM, 3d model, 3D cockpit, all specific avionic,.....) I am really surprise, you don't anderstand that.
GGTharos Posted March 30, 2006 Posted March 30, 2006 No, you're correct. I worded what I said incorrectly. Let me explain further: ED has introduced AFM with FC, and ins introducing 3D pit with Ka-50 as well as complex navigation and avionics modelling. It is taking a long time to develop these technologies, but once done, it iwll be much faster to create a new aircraft using those technologies. While it will still take time to configure a new aircraft properly, and create the new pit etc, it will -not- take anywhere near as long as it took to actually develop these technologies. Therefore, once these technologies are established, it will be much easier to add new aircraft and still have time to do other upgrades to the sim. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
T-Bone Posted March 31, 2006 Posted March 31, 2006 So this F-16 is going to included in a new sim? It's not going to be sold as an addon flyable to Lock On? T-Bone [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus G72GX | CPU: Core 2 Duo Overclocked @ 2.9Ghz | Memory 6GB DDR2 | Graphics Card: nVidia GTX 260m 1GB | OS: Windows 7 Home Premium | Monitor: Samsung 32" LCD LOMAC 1.0 to FC 1.12 System RIP (2003-2010) | AMD Athlon 64 3000+ overclocked to 2565MHz | NVidia Geforce 7800 GS AGP 256 MB | 1GB Kingston PC2700 DDR DRAM | Windows 2000 with SP4
GGTharos Posted March 31, 2006 Posted March 31, 2006 Once Ka-50 is out, Lockon is OVER. No more Lock On. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
MonnieRock Posted April 1, 2006 Posted April 1, 2006 Accounting the detals we are implementing now in Ka-50 we simply have not much time for flankers. You will not get the same as there will be many enchancements in AI behavior (aircrafts and ground units), graphics (not HDR yet, as it needs complete revamp of the engine), completely new trees (SpeedTree engine), new terrain set (Georgia far to the Turkey border) and other things which are in the development now... Regarding on aircrafts... Let's be patient. Actually 1.2 will demonstrate the absolutely new approach to the avionics design detail. It takes much more time to implement than we even could suppose. Definitely we will start the total reimplementation of "flankers" somewhere in the future, but not earlier than we will release F-16CJ. Any new (or rereleased) aircraft will be implemented in the way we are doing Ka-50 now (AFM, clickable, with true INS/RLG/EGI, startup procedures, and tons of other stuff). I am reading conflicting reports. SpeedTree engine in 1.2? Dual Core Poll Please Vote Rack Rig: Rosewill RSV-L4000 | Koolance ERM-3K3UC | Xeon E5-1680 v2 @ 4.9ghz w/EK Monoblock | Asus Rampage IV Black Edition | 64GB 2133mhz | SLI TitanXP w/ EK Waterblocks | 2x Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Seasonic 1000w Titanium | Windows 10 Pro 64bit | TM Warthog HOTAS w/40cm Extension | MFG Crosswind Rudders | Obutto R3volution | HP Reverb
AKULA_OPTIMUS Posted April 1, 2006 Posted April 1, 2006 No, I think ED has no time to included it:( :(
Witchking Posted April 1, 2006 Author Posted April 1, 2006 please ED....please give us speedtree :( WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro | |A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA|
Recommended Posts