All Activity

Tbf in reality pilots apparently lowered the volume to almost minimum as well, because it just gave so many warnings.

Just watch the warnings. You'll see emitters jumping around on both azimuth, distance and type. It may well be a very realistic depiction of the SPO15. I'm not knowledgeable enough to argue for our against. But I know for a fact that it is as useless as the SPO10. I fly the Fulcrum like I do the 21: without SPO.

Thank you for reply. The problem is, i even do not know what to change in the registry. Because I do not know where to begin when trying to follow your advice I searcherd for the registry keys but did not find under HKCU\Software\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Path and HKCU\Software\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World\ Before I did transfer the STEAM installlation it was under "Steam" on D and now it is named " SteamLibrary" on E I assumed, it might have something to do with this? However, before migrating to Drive E it did copy the files from the STEAM installation to the stand alone. Or maybe this feature does not work anymore an it was only by incident I migrated at the same time?

Это известно. Будут править.

Раритет первых серий. С гребнями под килями и без блоков выброса ловушек.

More informative error messages would certainly help. Same applies to the Error 500 issue. It shouldn't be too difficult to add human-readable error messages to the popup and the dcs.log, so users are not left absolutely clueless as to what is going on. I've even detailed a straightforward way to implement that. Should be feasible in a day's work.

Thank you so much brother. I appreciate your hard work!

Фото старое и не моё. А я там уже 3-4 года не появлялся. Так что всё возможно. ...Вот тоже не моё но уникальное точно.

Btw is it actually false warning? I thought it was more like the 21s RWR, where it just picks up radar from the entire battlefield but cant seperate them effectively. Outside of the own radar interference, that sounds pretty troubling.

347

Вот тут с 8.40 наглядно. При выборе пушки при захвате маркер именно на цели лежит.

Which page is this?

And youre not wrong with that. Maybe im bad at communicating it, but I think the difference isnt quite as big as people sometimes think. For example, is an F4 more suitable for solo operation than a Mig-21 in DCS? Sure! Yet if the Mig-21 gets AWACS support (like EWRS mod), it will immediately dominate the F4 in terms of SA. Give it real soviet style GCI and its not even funny anymore. I would assume the Mig-29 has better SA than the F4 tho, aside from the RWR. Its radar is superior and so is the view out of the cockpit. Aerodynamics/thrust also helps navigating and reacting to dangerous situations. The SPO15 is a weakpoint, but it can see SARH launches I 'think', which the F4 cant.

Overall, I agree with you, except for the missiles. The missiles in DCS are the best in any simulator. I've been following their development for many years. Also, ED guys wrote that the MiG-29 radar is completely based on the new physics and is currently the best in the simulator. Give it a try. We also got the completely new SPO, implemented as closely as possible to the original, and now I hope all future developments will be just as good.

Это баг или фича? по-моему у 29 не показывает (т.е в привычном для нас понимании) маркер на цель, показывает только отклонение антенны. Или я не прав?

From the changelog: With every update of the mod packs, I remove the assets that are now in DCS core.

Да? по-моему его уже там нет. В этом году июне по крайней мере точно не было

I haven't said there is anything better out there; if there were, I'd be there. DCS is the best there is. It doesn't change the fact, however, that overall ecm, rwr (especially blue), iff, radar (except maybe the F4s excellent pulse radar), missile behavior implementations in DCS are imaginative suppositions, which by the way is understandable as these are top secret pieces of info. And therefore realism is targeted by ED; it is not a set in stone promise or provision in DCS. If you have no problem rearming/repairing within minutes, then the same should apppy to other aspects. Gameplay is a thing.

The map should have nothing to do with it. Check for AI wingmen in your flight.

I agree. That's why the first batch of MiG-29s didn't have countermeasures dispensers at all. They did later, but they were only intended for flares. The threat from radar missiles was likely considered insignificant.

I have the same issue, that the Applicatiuon closes after a few seconds. Where do i check if the MENU Key is binded or not? In DCS?

Предыдущий не то выложил. Там уже значительно переделали. Это 29СМ вроде самый первый. Вот 29М. По сути обычный 29 только гак прикрутили. https://disk.yandex.ru/mail/?hash=FTFFQgmh6dGeNc5zSHOxEj9xx5%2B4m8dPfBpq04fI9S8Weo0LazvH8Rwq0WJRJesGq%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D https://disk.yandex.ru/mail/?hash=9j%2B%2Bd7%2FJL3BLJovxfzbUsH3ha1e8n7Kodck47LCZUODEpKRnhncxWEOpCWfEv5d7q%2FJ6bpmRyOJonT3VoXnDag%3D%3D

Yes that is also a reason to dig deep and see if SPO works with radar in ДОГОН mode (P). Zoraja had his radar in ДОГОН while fighting which he stated.

That's what I do, as all the spo 15 does is distracting you with false warnings.

You're mistaken. The combat manual for the 9-13 aircraft (as you know, a later version than the 9-12) states the following in Russian: When the radar is switched on, it is impossible to use the information from the SPO-15 due to its erroneous and chaotic nature. And this isn't the only source of information prohibiting the use of SPO when the radar is switched on.