Leaderboard

Вот наш сквадовский скин на Миг-29С. Года полтара назад лепили его спецом для пиратского сквада.

В брифингах есть ;)

Тут мне давече пришлось полностью перенастраивать кнопочки, в связи с чем появилось пожелание. Когда нужно очистить 5-6 настроек кнопок - выбираю настройку кнопки, жму очистить, список кнопок перескакивает в самое начало. Приходиться опять опускаться вниз, искать место где удалял настройку и удалять следующую, список опять перескакивает на верх. Очень не удобно. Можно сделать, что0бы он не скакал на верх а оставался там, где я с ним работаю?

Скрутил еще мувик где смоделировано реальное размещение ЗРК "ОСА" проходивщих упрожнений контрольных стрельб в Севастополе. http://www.virtual-jabog32.de/index.php?section=downloads&subcat=28&getfile=732

SK is the good cop ;)

HERE HERE!! 3Sqn would back that...sick of 5G grey out! But whatever. 3Sqn will get back to you shortly with names/numbers. We are relatively flexible on the times as stated previously and would make an effort to stay up quite late if it meant a whole extra squad could be included (ie Jabog32). We have no limitation on aircraft type to fly, or what type of role, although we specialise in Air-Air, but would run a training package to get up to speed on A-G/SEAD if assigned that role. For 3sqn, the rules/fairness/kudos of the excercise are less important than just getting out there and flying it. We will endevour not to make special requests/ultimatums, we'll just be there. Fudd, again, let us know what we can do to help. Get back to you with approximate numbers soon.

The video is availible for download in the lower center of the screen on this page. http://www.f22-raptor.com/ May be old to some but I thought it was worth posting... The video includes, J-turns, backflips, basically the lastest moves. It's a very nice copy by the way.

Yo-Yo, Are the HUD airspeed indications not in KCAS or the Mach readout in error? The Dash-1 numbers are based on instrument readings within the cockpit - specifically KCAS and Mach. The performance is based upon what's these instruments show. If the HUD airspeed indications are valid - showing appropriate KCAS and Mach, then these should be used for all airspeed benchmarks. Using a computed TAS can cause the flight profile between the points to be in error - slightly slow or fast airspeed indications, which affect the slope. Here's another chart of Time downrange vs Distance. This chart shows the slope of the climb. The slopes, as you've said do indeed match up fairly well, however, as you can see the slope isn't the whole picture. If the LOMAC F-15 were performing similarly to the Dash-1, the altitudes that they arrive at should match HORIZONTALLY. That is, each aircraft should arrive at the same altitude with the same delta in time and distance. This would show a line similar to the Dash-1 slope, but skewed to the left/right a specific percentage. It does not show this, as you can see from the chart. The altitudes don't match closely on the horizontal axis after 10,000ft. You can make the argument that low altitude performance of the LOMAC F-15 closely APPROXIMATES the real F-15, but above 10,000ft, you can see it diverges significantly (appears more than a 15% divergence in performance).