[PTF]Ali

Negative, There is no reason to blame anything, The project vision is to have reasonable price jets not looting other states with shining canopies. Block 3 jf-17 one only in the world is budget friendly AESA radar capable jet which can ground any stealth plane in the world, If 30 million jet can ground 180 million jet there is no sense looting states and your people with taxes... JF-17 has approach of efficiency and effectivity at same time and has very optimistic profile. You upgrade things when you need it... Jf-17 is made for Pakistan requirements not your requirements sir.

Negative, If you talking about DCS its true, But if you talking about real life then my dude Fox3 is not dependent on radar guidance it is also connected with datalink and other platforms like AWACS. You don't need Jf-17 radar only to lock and engage bandits. Wikipedia info is true. Most of the people here are wrong and has superficial opinions. I wanna hear from official entities not you sorry.

So what are sources which can back your claims? I guess there was PL-15 in block 2, Since that was classified or something, Wikipedia combine information from sources and then compile it...

On official Jf-17 Wikipedia i saw many A/A missiles which are absent in DCS jf-17 armament, Will we get these missiles in future to compete with new modules like Eurofighter Typhoon etc?

F16 was getting missile launch warning even missile was fired in TWS mode. TRK: https://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=242813&d=1595088792 SD-10 Discussion: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=281145

So recently I made mission and tested SD-10 because new patch has arrived, but i came to know it is still untouched since new aim120c model, So i thought DCS will fix guidance bug of SD-10, i have already reported but no response from developers or beta testers. First track file showing following problems:- 1: Missile is losing track 2: Missile stalls when approach to target 3: Missile Stutter when it launches (No smooth launch like aim120c) 4: Missile losing guidance even it is guided by radar. Second Track file showing following problems:- 1: Test against Human F16, F16 was getting missile launch warning even missile was fired in TWS mode. . . . SD-10 Bug.trk F16 Getting RWR warning when missile launch in TWS mode of JF17111.rar

Ok i apologize for recent comment, It is indeed pilot error, Ok i'm not this hotfix reader and also on AutoStart, Is new script has been added?

Sorry to say but you guys are tester, It will take only 1 minute to check your self, I have 500 hours on this plane yet you think this is pilot error? And about TRK, I am playing multiplayer missions which don't allow TRK. They post it in 24 hours

Guys how about J7, F7PG

absolutely yes!

No oxygen on cold start, Hot start it is working, There is no oxygen in cold start plane, Will we get Hotfix for it ??

There should be more fan of Ju-88 than spitfire i guess, How about ED release this incredible multirole [/url]

Looking forward to see Pakistan Air force F16 livery.

It is a wish list but looking forward to see Pakistan Air force official dcs F16 livery.

what is up with july 15

I guess developers no more care about SD-10 performance issues in latest open beta patch, The missile keep stalling and losing track even from mother radar. It has now stupid unrealistic drag. Jf17 as a unique platform for SD-10 it should be fixed as soon as possible. Or we can say that ED has control over marketing of Jf-17 module only because of SD-10 performance. Preview: following problems are there after latest patch. 1: Missile losing track even it is Semi-Active 2: Missile keep stalling on stable speed 3: Missile keep losing track while lofting 4: Inaccurate drag parameters (Critical speed loss after new Aim120c model update) 5: Totally bugged Active Scan Azimuth on missile 6: Non sense drifting while fully semi active radar guidance 7: It is struggling tracking target even it is connected with mother radar

Here is our TRK file, What we tested. F16 and Jf17 against F18 , Whenever F16 TWS lock enemy f18, it appears on jf17 datalink SATAL_2020_Diamond_SENAKI-MOZDOK_NoAwacs_2.5.6.50321-20200622-194936.trk

Ok give me 24 hours i will post TRK yes f16 was client.

Phoenix Task Force

We are testing JF17 datalink in Satal Diamond match where there is no awac, We tested Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts without awacs just F16 is not receiving Jf-17 radar data. So tell me how jf17 receiving f16 data without awac but f16 is not, There is clearly problem? And before further discussion can you introduce yourself because i want to ask deka ironwork support.

Datalink Problem Hi, Recently i noticed F16 is not receving Datalink contacts from link17 Jf17 on the other hand Jf17 is receiving every radar contact from F16 without awac, My aim is that is there anyway F16 can receive Jf17 contacts without awac even Jf17 is getting radar contacts of f16 without AWAC. Thanks

Negative, Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts without awacs, There is no problem with Link 16 and link 17, Only F16 is not getting Jf-17 radar contacts. Is Jf17 datalink output is bugged or work in progress? I want to connect Jf17 and F16 without awac, It is working but F16 is not receiving my JF17 radar contacts

Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts, There is no problem with Link 16 and link 17, Only F16 is not getting Jf-17 radar contacts. Is Jf17 datalink output is bugged or work in progress? I want to connect Jf17 and F16 without awac, It is working but F16 is not receiving my JF17 radar contacts

Guys, thanks for reply, There is SATAL match of diamond where AWACS are not allowed,