[PTF]Ali

Airframe of jf-17 ka easily pull more than 9Gs on EFCS mode at more than Mach 1, Only problem with this system is that you have to manually enable it to EFCS to pull high Gs, I'm imagining, is this system is implemented correct? Cause on Auto FCS it should automatically turn on EFCS when at high speed, I'm curious to know, It is so annoying manually selecting Auto FCS and EFCS all the time in combat, May be Flight model is not complete but i guess with all my perceptions like F16, Auto mode should enable and disable EFCS all the time at high speed and low speed,

I have confusion about EFCS and Auto FCS mode on JF-17, On Auto mode it never pull more than 6G even it is auto, shouldn't it work like EFCS to pull high G on JF-17 at high speed like F16? Auto mode don't work, How auto FCS make sense if there is EFCS? I always use EFCS to pull high G maneuvers like Split S. Is this Auto mode is Work in progress? I have seen many JF-17 airshow, He is flying at high speed but still pulling enough G? Is that really implemented in DCS JF-17? Is this system is smart like f16 fly by wire?

one should aware of how things work, It can be fix with Quick Fix update, But why???? Cause indeed there is problem with ED which creating more issues to developers. I felt so shame i was mocking Deka Ironwork for this, But its stupid for me is that it was ED's fault, Why not Quick Fix update??? No one Answer? We have Proof and evidence but No fix from ED. Understand please. Ultimately it can create more problems in future, Trust Issues and more. At competitive ground like SATAL these bugs consider to be major bugs, It create a scenario where opponent f18 or f16 getting intel of when missile is fired and whole tactical scenario is destoryed. But ED is not serious about these absolute sensitive terms.

Don't buy JF-17? I absolute agree with that, I have already reported so many times these issue, Beta team ignores everything, Can we lose hope? ED will never fix that, Don't buy this module cause it chinese? I guess this is true now.

Or people are free to create threads or videos on youtube, Don't buy JF-17 because it has specific bug, Don't buy it because SD-10 is bullshit... We can see how ED's problem can change perception of people and Organization's only module. In term of weapons, ED should take it serious or is it too late?

I agree with that, What we should do about that, Cause marketing of Jf-17 is depend on A/A, Its like ED messing up with Deka Ironwork sales

It is not working, i tested it on runway, there was no hole at all

Same here, Really appreciate their work, That was full functional module when launched. Awesome work :thumbup:

i agree with that

I'm a bit curious about knowing exactly what JF-17 block version we are on? What to expect for future? What exact avionics we have on DCS on jf-17.

you mean Launch Warning,

No fix for it then :D???

Jf-17 is even 1 foot smaller than f16 too :thumbup:, Mig21 has huge spine and has no composite material may be but jf-17 has.

I don't want to mention real life events but when mirage 2000 were in collision course with JF-17 recent event, There are reports that they were not able to see jf-17s, May be it was because of SPJ or EW, but in most cases and confirmed JF-17 with 2 sidewinders and 2 SD-10 is really really stealthy at long ranges for old generation radars.

There is a bug in F18 and F16 RWR right now and confirmed, Please fix this ASAP More info: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4443365&postcount=10

Guys any update on this issue? Cause i have reported to ED but no update from ED very far, Also it is becoming annoying in tactical ground when you need precise engagements, you know what i mean on competitive ground (SATAL) I believe this issue must be resolved ASAP with quick fix or something cause it is major bug, Can you guys, with your reference ask ED to fix this issue, It will be very appreciated thanks for respond

I guess everything is here, What module you have?

So this is confirm f18 getting missile launch warning even if JF-17's SD-10 was fired in TWS mode. Are we getting fix for it ASAP thx? RWR Discussion: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4443365&postcount=10

So this is confirm f16 getting missile launch warning even if JF-17's SD-10 was fired in TWS mode. Are we getting fix for it ASAP thx? RWR Discussion: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4443365&postcount=10

So this is confirm f18 and f16 getting missile launch warning even if SD-10 was fired in TWS mode, After confirmation from Deka Ironwork that it is absolute not problem of radar or missile of JF-17, It must have something to do with F16 and F18 RWR. Are we getting fix ASAP please?? JF-17 Radar discussion: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=281158 SD-10 Discussion (Include TRK File of RWR problem): https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=281145

Thats interesting btw, How about Jf-17 without pylons, It will affect Missiles and Radar notching in DCS?

Is JF-17 frame has accurate radar cross section simulation in DCS right now? Cause it was meant to have very small radar cross section than most plane in DCS. Its stealthy Intakes and very small profile at front aspect, Do we have accurate radar cross section even in DCS?

I'm afraid i have already reported this seeker problem on ED weapon's issue thread, But no one coming on this case to fix the issue.

What about hornet he is talking about, SD-10 is surely broken or something

I have already reported this issue, But beta team is not getting on this case. I guess this has something to do with SD-10, And Eagle dynamic itself. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=281158