Isegrim

Hast du Zwei Bestätigungsmails wenn du beide gekauft hast? Hast du die etwa einzeln gekauft? Wenn du Flaming Cliffs 3 gekauft hast bekommst du nur einen key. Aber es sind die: A10-A Su25-A MIG-29 A/G und S SU-33 SU-27 und F-15C enthalten. Ausserdem muss dann FC3 im Modulmanager(Hauptmenu Kästchen oben) installiert werden. Und nicht die Maschinen einzeln. ISE Edit: Achso Steam...... naja Selber schuld> Tipp kein Steam nutzen sofort wieder deinstallieren und hier: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/world/ DCS World 1.5 (!!!!) Herunterladen und installieren.

I like to have a second 2A42 on the left side of the fuselage. I would pay for that aswell. Thats not realistic but hey it looks cool. /// Ironics off ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seriously do you really think that anything of what you guys try to get here will ever happen??? Especially by raging (Why is there no MWS and no RWR and no R73). Ok OK that are nice tools but they just will never be added to the KA-50 Module. Also posting pictures of that systems off the successor of the KA-50 will not help. The KA-50 was testbed for many of the KA-52s systems thats for sure. The systems tested where very new in 2008 or even not in existence and top secret for sure aswell. So you will maybe get a license to model one of those systems in 20-30 Years but never today The KA-50 is what it is in DCS a Complex to learn but very fine module which needs some time and love to get into it. If some like a MWS in the KA-50 module>Switch on the Radio assist....thats why it is there.

OK and what will happen in DCS now? After you have wasted time while writing this genuine Text? You are ED tester. Write a request or Bug report or whatever. You will get the answer.

They have all been Prototypes. There has only been some "one like the other" KA-50s. Oh and not that you guys think iam against an MWS or RWR or R-73. The only thing iam trying to do is to make clear to you guys that this Discussion will lead into nothing...its simply a waste of time to write more on this Topic. There will be no further changes to the KA-50 this is what ED said to this theme. And this is what is happening. No matter how loud peole try to Blow the Horn here. Check just those Pictures of the Cockpits and that are just some. For sure they have also been modified and updated over time,but not all (or just some) in the same way. Left side for sure...right side is early KA-52 Ahm ...can we have this mirror Please:music_whistling:

KA-52 hat its maiden 97 and is in Produktion since 2008....byebye nmbr.25

Why dont we just go with the REAL thing. Wenn man es genau übertetzten möchte wirds Kauderwelsch.

Genau !!! :) Und vieleicht denkt ja auch mal jemand soweit das wenn es einen Dicken Transporthelikopter geben soll er unter umständen neue Features mit sich bringt. Also warum nicht.

-26 Have been build -All of them where different -We in DCS have Number 24 Modeled (IIRC). Which has an LWS an ABRIS AMMS and no R-73 Cabability -Today all of them have been converted into KA-52

Did you read my Post? The Airframe simulated in DCS doesnt have these things.

In naher Zukunft bedeuted 1-2 Jahre. Jo das is OK

This year the Tornados are Camouflaged as A4 Skyhawk. :smilewink:

That would be ULTRA Amazing.:punk:

The KA-50 number 24 which is the one that has been modeled in DCS does not have an RWR MWS or wiring to launch the R-73. Chizh already said that we can be happy to have the ABRIS AMMS and that there will no aditions to the Current KA-50 Module in DCS. Those Discussions come up in 6 Month Cycles but will lead into nothing. You should Prey for an 52 instead. ISE

Isnt that a SU-25TM / SU-39 ?!?! I See a Kopjo Radar Pod there and R-77s. Uhh i would give my .... ahm .... i defenitly have currently no idea what. But i would really give something very special to see this Bird fully simulated as Module in DCS.

Wie wars eine Crew für das jeweilige Einsatzspektrum. Da für eine Crew die alle einsatzspektren abdecken soll das Flugzeug zu Komplex ist.

I Tested some KA-50s on red side seems like the ones at Krasnodar ,Mineral, Nalchik, Mozdok, Maykop are not cold and dark. Couldnt test Sukhumi.

Du kannst auch über Starforce einen neuen Key anfordern das ist bisschen Kompliziert geht aber mehr oder weniger sofort. Ich habs vor 5 Jahren oder so mal gemacht. Man muss sich bisschen reinfitzen und dann den Alten Key und Hardwarecode eingeben. Danach wird ein neuer generiert. Den man natürlich Aufschreiben sollte. Kuggst du hier. http://proactive.star-force.com/2.0/userinfo.php Mit liebe ISE :)

Evtl. Einfach mal länger warten DCS kann beim ersten Starten durchaus mal eine ganze weile brauchen. Wichtig ist auch das während dieser Zeit nichts am Rechner betätigt wird. Vieleicht klappts ja.

Ich hab doch kein Wagenfett genommen oder sowas.

Ich find sie ungenau. Da die Aluröhren auf denen die Pedale laufen recht schwierig einzuschätzen sind. Stichwort Haftreibung /Gleitreibung > man gibt entweder zuviel Input oder zu wenig. Habs mit fetten probiert bringt aber nix.

The Bug only takes effect as long as the Shkval is caged.

:)