Jump to content

AJaromir

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    519

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by AJaromir

  1. AJaromir
    It looks like the glide slope indicated by PAPI lights is much more steep than 3°. Is that correct?
  2. AJaromir
    Considering the P-factor, shouldn't it be on the opposite side (left) when the propeller is spinning to the right?
  3. AJaromir
    The new in-flight raindrop system which blurs everything (which is probably corret) looks very differently when I use MSAA 4x and when I use DLAA. In all cases the motion blur is turned off, upscaling is turned off. MSAA 4X: DLAA, sharpening = 0 DLAA, sharpening = 1
  4. AJaromir
    I seem to have solved the problem by removing all six FC3 (sub)modules and reinstalling it via the new UI (not via in-game) module manager. Can anyone confirm?
  5. AJaromir
    Try to set english language.
  6. AJaromir
    My date and time is correct. Still have this issue.
  7. AJaromir
  8. AJaromir
    I don't have this issue. Can you see the modules folders of those?
  9. AJaromir
    If you check the modules folder you can see the aircrafts are no longer in the FC3 folder, but each aircraft is like separate module. I think there is some activation issue which excepts that you have installed FC3 and not each module separately.
  10. AJaromir
    But that's still only half the solution.
  11. AJaromir
    They almost never do that. Also they can not when they don't own desired aircraft.
  12. AJaromir
    You can have set T/O assist to value 0, you can have forced your gameplay settings, but if the multiplayer mission is saved with T/O assist on ( T/O assist value > 0 in the client in which the mission was edited ), it is not possible to force it off for myself
  13. AJaromir
    Really? Should Ponzi really buy ED?
  14. AJaromir
    RB must withdraw the product. They are the ones who own it and thus decide whether or not it will be sold.
  15. AJaromir
    Well, I would like to see in terms of service more rights to own product. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/legal/terms_of_service.php
  16. AJaromir
    If Razbam owns its products, then it has every right to have them removed from the ED website at its own request. Razbam itself doesn't seem to want to do that, or else it probably would have happened a long time ago. I think if RB cares about protecting the user from buying potential abandonware, they should do so.
  17. AJaromir
    Still the content is published by ED and not by themself. Heatblur is the only one I know who sells the keys independently on the ED store.
  18. AJaromir
    It is a third party to the user because the user is contracting with ED and not with other developers. But ED is the publisher in this case. So there is the same or similar relationship as, for example, between Electronic Arts and game studios like Bioware, Dice, EA Capital Games,.... Although ED doesn't own them (unlike EA, who owns the studios in question), they more or less act as if they do, because they can't do otherwise. I understand the principle that ED wants money from the sale of other modules as well, because the core game is free and therefore providing the SDK is conditional on a contract. But that makes the developer in question such a pseudo property of Eagle Dynamics.
  19. AJaromir
    Actually Razbam, HB, e.t.c... are 2nd party developers from view of the ED because they have contracts with ED. Pure 3rd party developer would be developer of the A-4E mod. Or like addon developers for X-plane, MSFS2020,... - In short they are independent on publisher.
  20. AJaromir
    Btw that review bombing on Steam is also frustrating. Yes. Because all contracts are with ED. The 3rd party developer stuff is sold via ED page. Not via their own page. ED is like publisher.
  21. AJaromir
    Anti skid on? Maybe it prevents to turn the wheel to avoid skid.
  22. AJaromir
    Here is video how the Mig-19P looked like when ED denied to remove "EA" mark out of it.
  23. AJaromir
    As a customer (consumer), I could care less about internal disputes. I am simply a customer, I buy goods and the seller has to comply with all the legal conditions that apply in the country. If the contract guarantees support, they must provide it. If they knowingly sell a broken product or otherwise mislead the buyer, they can be severely punished for that. Which is currently ED's problem, because ED is the one who sells the modules in question, regardless of who creates them. In our country, by law, the seller is responsible for the products.
  24. AJaromir
    Being an official 3rd party developer to me means that ED guarantees the quality of those developers. After all, developers could easily release content for DCS:W unofficially, simply as a paid mod. That's more or less how it has been working for decades in X-plane, FSX and MSFS2020. And as we know, you don't need to be an official developer to make a reputation for a team. See the A-4E project, PMDG addons for MSFS, A2A addons for MSFS,... Never official, still better than original.
  25. AJaromir
    It's blocked by reputation-based protection. I have this report for Harrier. What is sus that yesterday there had been no report.
×
×
  • Create New...