zaGURUinzaSKY

Few hours, I'm not a helicopter pilot, but I fly in helicopters for work (aerial photograhy) and sometime I pilot in the way back home.

the Robinson flies better in FSX than FS2004 and very similar to the real thing, I like it! Also other aircrafts flight models look to me very good. about graphic performance ...mmmm.... we'll have more fun with next computer..

photoshopped?? I don't think so.. I have a photographic book (I have many, I'm a commercial photograhper) about these kind of stuff over corn fields or other kind of fields.. it's incredible what they are able to do, belive me this is not photoshop, people do much more actually than asimple text like that..

Do you have same performance in gameplay?

KC-135 refueling a C-5 Galaxy in mid-air http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/download.php?Number=476176

I have some dvds from this guy, really top products! Product page: http://www.lionelcharlet.com/EN/en_project_aviation.html Video extract: http://www.lionelcharlet.com/films/ICE_HORNET_768k.ram

Nice stuff, can u describe a bit the buttons and levers in the throttle? How is the movement of the throttle compared to the X52 or other famous controllers?

Very nice prod from Microsoft.. maybe we'll be able to create sceneries just sucking pictures from the net as photosynth does! Have a look : http://labs.live.com/photosynth/default.html incredible!!

link doesn't work here...

I see, thanx a lot for your reply. I only host lockon and connect as client to a Ventrilo's server.

I 'm tweaking Windows with TuneUp Utilities 2006 (really great software), and there is an option about QoS, it says: " The QoS service reserves bandwidth for important packets when necessary". I can choose to reserve xxx% of bandwidth or not. Is this option usefull if I host a mission in lock on ? Thanx!

is this a rumor or is there something to read about it?

Does it??

Just my comment, the rotor vid is really nice, that's a nice feature, I just wonder why we still haven't some basic feature as the differential wheels brake that I suggested months ago.. I'm sure we'll have fun with strong wings now pulling the collective and looking the projectiles , who cares about taxing ;-) but it would be cool now that also Saitek is selling rudder pedals I hope you guys start working on some forgotten detail of your sim after the release of BS. btw very good job, it would be nice to see it published

that movie with Hitler looks very well done and intresting.. anyone knows the title of it?

Both, but I only use the Throttle of the X52, not the stick. I love the throttle and the stick shape and buttons, I don't like the gimbal system. But my comment on your previous post was about the AV8r, I know it sucks but it's probably what avarage gamers want.

oh well in Italy they just heard about the X-52... eheh but I'm gonna try it for sure, I need some fresh air around my ballz and these wider pedals look like a good solution!! I'll let you know when they broke.. Hey RuggButtDamus can you give me a date when the pedals will break ?? ;-) The best stuff will probably next CH prods.. but it will be 2017 probably.. goin to sleep now, 3 in the night in Italy.. seeya

ok Nostradamus, will be, but how do you know duude?

Disso consider that the Aviator is not a sequel of the X52... is just a toy for noobs..

How do u know how durable Saiteks pedals are ? I have never had durability problems with any of my hotas.. and as many of you I use them a lot.. dunno where the durability issue is . Becouse their ideas sell probably. I like MUCH more the X52 than that X-36 btw..

so we should consider 1 mode for you actually. I also use one , also becouse I only use saitek's throttle and there is no way to change mode from it...

Yes you did. Thanx

Do u use the 3 MODES proflie in your x52 or CH Fighterstick ?? I just do aerobatic so I only use one..

About the so called X-52PRO, If you have valuable ideas, express your self guys express yourself !! http://www.saitekforum.com/showthread.php?t=9880 It's important, we are the hardcore simmers (there are millions more simmers who just buy the products and use it few minutes per week but we're always here discussing how the real thing should be) and we have to say our ideas about our toys !!

as almost everybody I bought it and it's probably very realistic, that's why I don't like it and I don't fly it, performance of this aircraft are far away from what I like to pilot. gimme a flanker or fulcrum or any other muscle-aircrafts with that AFM... su-25T and blackshark are probably very well done but I hope they'll consider something more popular for the possible third "addon".. not another "what is this" aircraft.. Maybe it's more interesting for russian customers, ok nice stuff but gimme a hornet or a tomcat or whatever...