Falcon_S

My screenshot talk much more than the your analysis of what I wanted to say with that pic. And that screenshot is with good reason in this topic. Some people have already realized that. Missile A Missile B Energy Speed Hit Miss Eating chaffs/flares all these things come from modeling and you can not convince me that all missiles have the same treatment if we want to be close about the simulated RL opportunities. Let's ignore the lack of data form real life. If we're talking about ER`s - How is it possible that you have or accept that primary russian Air to Air missile is so bad in DCS? And why you insist that current ER model is ok??? How is "ok" i give you one more screenshot in attachment - my ER stats from 104th. If you want to say "is not so bad..." you need to know that the majority of hits and kills is inside of 6Km range. Yep, with medium range missile. :music_whistling: EDIT: majority of hits and kills is inside of 6Km range. - and misses too. What's happening in DCS code i don`t know and i can`t talk about that but it`s definitely wrong. Will ED do something to change things i don`t know but majority of us agree that something is wrong and differences between Missile A and Missile B are there. Let`s back on word "MAGIC" one more time. My MAGIC word is ENERGY (speed).

From Your fav tactics against Su-27 in a merge ? :)

Small discussion at F-16.net forum about G limits (for those who have not read) http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10663

I know that... just want that you say that or something like that. ;)

Can you explain to me why ER can`t intercept / hit target or why so many miss in DCS in short range / no escape? Please.

Agree... on that forces must happens some structural damage. if not immediately then second or third time but DCS F15C can do that infinitely many times without concern for some structural damage. I hope that will be changed ASAP.

In every topic you trying to be DCS PR and tell us how we don`t know how to play proprely. Please show us that we are wrong with your arguments. for ex. 2x2=4 or as GG do it... I know that many things from military are science but is not need not be very smart to see if something is absurdly in DCS as missile that cant intercept target or we cant guide that missile on that target and many other things. This forum is mainly feedbacks to ED`s from its suporters - and common goal is BETTER SIM.

This is from last RedFlag. Situation when MicroVAX kill Frostie. ACMI time: 01:40:00 http://www.mediafire.com/file/h64okxoo3yf5a1v/Red_Flag_March.trk

Do you know why in DCS no any MAGIC from Russian side?

Any progress about ER`s? ;) Meanwhile i see MATRA corporation DO MAGIC :doh:

Magic word is Limiter.

Nice Joey45...

Try RAlt+Enter (real fullscreen).

@Ciribob Just installed the latest version and everything working ok. Tested on BS server. Thanks. :thumbup:

Open Windows Defender, Settings and add exclusions (.exe or folder).

I don`t know year... Not specified. (maybe is somewhere inside) 1. I don`t have btn #39 (only #32), illumination brightness of the MFD and all the button illuminations work by using slider in control panel 2. i can switch profiles on the fly using systray icon. I don`t use buttons for that and my clutch button is used as normal button (for ex. Flares are maped on it) One more time - I use Saitek X52 (not PRO)

After many problems in the past with the Saitek or Madcatz driver/software combinations all things that are not work as expected now works perfectly with 6.0.4.1 and 6.6.6.9. Also, I once had a combination of versions (driver/software... i don`t remember ver. numbers) and in the beginning i thought it was everything ok. But after a while I started having problems... As for my X52 i can tell only that drv. 6.0.4.1 and SST6.6.6.9 give me full Saitek abilities.

Maybe is problem Tacview if you are not install hotfix. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3048020&postcount=29

X-52 I think yes.

When i click on that links with my Chrome it starting download.

Сретно мајсторе! (good luck maestro!)

Very nice.

Guys, never happened to me too >> until two evenings ago. First time and unexpected. There is always a first time and what then? - Because of that all of you will lock twist stick, will stop using pedales? :joystick: BTW my x52 is in perfect condition, pls see attachment. No, I'll put two bricks (few kg) on my hand to simulate force. :D

@shagrat Yes, with a twist stick. I don`t have pedals. @Yo-Yo This video only show breaking stabilisers. I know this is extreme on video but i just wanted to show. My problem (i think i`m not alone with this problem) is that i broke stabilisers in some flight sudenly with no intention. It's not supposed to be happening. If we have this simulated (breaking stabilisers) we just need to have that limiter modeled. (As is described in SK manual) EDIT: Let's look at this way... Let's look at some of 1000 YT DCS (f15 or M2000...) videos and we will see that people do crazy things with his joysticks without consequences. So, how we (su27 pilots) can fight against them at high speds If we can not do "this" or "that" although it is unintentionally? I'm not asking mercy or balancing - just that If something works let it to work properly. Ok, we have Su27 AFM wich is great and i like realism as deformation or breakage but only if I crossed the limits. But that I don`t exceed the limits there are limiters (as is in RL).