dcn

It's made up I think.FH-234 is F-105D

lol F4U-1D is ready for release as soon as Marianas WWII map is ready.Now I can get the conclusion that F4U-1D is delayed for four years just to wait for the release of Marianas WWII map.Sounds ridiculous but this is truth.And I guess ED asked M3 to keep improving F4U-1D during the past four years.But I still don't know why the release of La-7 is delayed.

I think the problem of DCS Yak-52 is that DCS Yak-52 is a professional commercial training project of Eagle Dynamics. It is transplanted into DCS World but we DCS players don't have Yak-52 in real life. I mean DCS Yak-52 can't teach me everything in real life flight,it can't replace real life flight. That's exactly what I wanted to say.

That's exactly what I wanted to say. You admit DCS Yak-52 can't teach me real life flight. I have never denied that you will learn faster.It suddenly occurred to me that DCS Yak-52 can only be used as an auxiliary means of learning real life flight, just like real pilots use a simulated flight cabin as an auxiliary means of learning real life flight.

I was just complaining. That's from DCS Yak-52 manual. I knew DOSAAF, but I couldn't find the data. Do you have data on the number of Yak-52 in the Soviet Air Force and Yak-52 in DOSAAF? Do you have evidence that Yak-52 in DOSAAF are mainly used for aerobatics rather than flight training?

That's Fw 190 G-8...You confused Fw 190 F-8 with F-8.

I downloaded the pdf of it a few years ago, but it didn't work well when I tried it in DCS Yak-52. You may not have read the DCS Yak-52 manual I sent. During its creation, the designers took elements from the Yak-50 and Yak-18 models, but made some improvements. The Yak-50 and Yak-52 had to be very similar to each other (for cross-compatibility of the parts and structural elements) yet at the same time fly in completely different ways. For an aircraft designed for sports and aerobatics, minimal stability and quick response to the pilot's slightest action are key, yet an aircraft built for training purposes must be stable, much less sensitive to pilot input, and capable of carrying a fairly weighty equipment package onboard. The Experimental Design Bureau was faced with the task of designing an aircraft that was both sufficiently stable and maneuverable (capable of performing even spinning aerobatic figures) - and their efforts were met with success. The designers finished their work in record time, with the entire design process taking only a few months. It is noteworthy that the project was led by a team of experienced designers, with V.P. Kondratiev at its head, and that the collaboration of the bureau's divisions was coordinated by members of the Komsomol. This is exactly what I mean. Agree.DCS has been involved in the field of civil aviation, but the effect is not good, such as Christen Eagle II. This is what I have been repeating in this thread. That's why I want to learn real life flight from scratch.But I failed,in DCS a trainer aircraft can't teach me how to fly a plane in real life,so I think ED releasing Yak-52 might be a mistake.

I don't think Yak-52 was designed as an aerobatic aircraft, even though it took into account the requirements of aerobatics during its design. From DCS Yak-52 manual:

Well I didn't notice you said today, I'm not sure about today, but I believe in Soviet times they were mostly used to train pilots. I said at the beginning of this topic that Yak-52 can do aerobatics.

Weren't Yak-52 used in the Soviet Union to train beginners?

I think trainer aircraft is used to learn to fly. ED provides it, so I should use it to learn to fly.If this is not possible, then ED may have made a mistake in releasing the Yak-52. I think ED wants us to abandon the game mentality, calm down, re-examine flying, focus on the basics, and learn to fly from scratch.

The newly launched career mode seems good, but it may be a little far from the real life flight course I want. There is another problem, even if you learn all the courses of real life flight by yourself and keep training in DCS trainer aircraft, you dare not say that you can fly a plane solo, for example,Yak-52 in real life.The DCS environment is different from real life. You seem to think that turning correctly is too simple. What should be done to initiate the turn? Should I roll first or use rudder first, or do both at the same time? What should be done during the turn? What should be done to exit the turn? Should I roll first or use rudder first, or do both at the same time? I have some English flight training manuals. I mean these are supposed to be provided by ED. And I think these are not easy to find, I mean the manuals used for flight training, not the manuals for flying a certain aircraft. I said in my first reply in this topic that I have C-101,L-39 and Yak-52.

This is what makes me feel conflicted. If there were no trainer aircraft in DCS, I would play fighters in a game way. But DCS provides trainer aircraft, which makes me think that ED wants us to treat simulated flight from the perspective of real life flight. One thing that I am dissatisfied with is that the manual of trainer aircraft in DCS does not provide detailed instructions on how to fly, such as how to turn correctly.I have to find the information myself

The course I mean is seriously learn real-life flight from scratch in a systematic way. Can't agree more. I think trainer aircraft in DCS should provide real life flight courses. I did not buy Kursant campaign, but I think it should not be able to provide real life flight courses I want. You are talking about private purchases, which are a minority. I believe that private purchasers already have a pilot's license, so they will not buy a real Yak-52 to learn to fly. Well,I just gave an example of how to turn. I think I am still far from being able to fly a real plane.

I guess he confused JF-17 with MiG-17F.

Maybe I made a mistake buying a Yak-52 without a real life flight instructor. I'm mainly talking about Yak-52. If there had never been trainer aircraft in DCS, I don't think I would be like this. Since DCS provides trainer aircraft, so I started to think, can I use trainer aircraft in DCS to do what real-life trainer aircraft does, that is, seriously learn real-life flight from scratch in a systematic way, but I failed, there is no real life flight instructor to teach me real life flight. Most DCS players have not received real life flight training, they can't fly airplanes in real life, but they can fly fighter in DCS and even become 'masters'. Many people have played flight simulations for many years but don't know how to turn correctly. The way they turn is just, roll, then pull the stick. They don't know what coordinated flying is. They start flying fighter without even learning how to turn correctly, but in real life, you have to start with trainer aircraft before you can fly a fighter.

JF-17F?What is that

Thanks for the video. I actually have some English flight training manuals, but I'm not a native English speaker and I don't think self-learning is very effective.

I don't know about other games, I'm talking about DCS. ED gave us a trainer aircraft, but didn't offer us real life courses. Imagine you have never learned real life flight and you bought a Yak-52 in real life, but there is no flight instructor to teach you, you have to learn it by yourself.

I am not a real pilot. Buying a Yak-52 won't teach me real life flight. Maybe ED should release a real life flight course bundle with Yak-52.

That's it.It's ironic that the purpose of buying Yak-52 is not to learn how to fly. Agree.

I may not have expressed myself clearly enough.In DCS trainer aircraft, you don't have a detailed aircraft tutorial like in real life, and there is no real life flight instructor to teach you everything about real life flying. There are many people who have played flight simulation for many years and don't know how to turn correctly, they don't know what coordinated flying is. This is missing in DCS, and there is no real life flight teaching in the game manual.Even the best player in DCS, when he starts to learn to fly in real life, he needs to start with a trainer aircraft, and he will still find a lot of knowledge that he has never learned. Of course, you can find a lot of courses about real life flying on the Internet, but this is far from enough. Self-study often cannot achieve the effect of professional teachers. And without the combination of theory and practice, DCS flying cannot replace real life flying. What I want to say is that even though I bought three trainer aircraft in DCS, I still can't fly a plane in real life.No one teaches me real life flight. I could certainly learn by myself, but the effect of self-study is always not as good as that of professional teachers. Even if you learn all the courses of real life flight by yourself and keep training in DCS trainer aircraft, you dare not say that you can fly a plane solo, for example,Yak-52 in real life. I don't know this,thank you! You are concerned about the Yak-52 itself, I am concerned about its function as a trainer. Can't agree more. Yes, I bought them for my collection, my first DCS aircraft were WWII aircraft.I think almost no beginners buy trainer aircraft to get started with DCS.

Please don't talk nonsense,I gave the link.

I think my core idea is that in DCS,a trainer aircraft can't teach you how to fly a plane in real life. You also admit that the Yak-52 is not a qualified trainer aircraft in DCS.I think Yak-52 in real life would not be so boring,because you can use it to learn to fly.This is not an easy task,it is very challenging.