dcn

You are right.It's so embarrassing

ENCLOSUREIRELEASE end of November Corsair I release?November 28th?

Thank you guys!

It's so nice of you,thank you! The 40 degrees of fully opend normal throttle position seems strange,in the table,40 degrees of throttle position only gives about 2300 RPM,does this mean engine speed can only reach about 2300 RPM at full throttle position with MBG emergency mode handle not pulled?

Thanks for you guys' information.Still confused about how to enable emergency power(increased take off power) which could last 3 min. Didn't test it for how long it could last.

Would appreciate it if you could send me the manual of Fw 190 D-9 or Jumo 213 A.In the game pulling the MBG emergency mode handle has similar effect as enabling MW-50,if it is true as you said,that's strange.

I don't want to say the same words again and again. As for MiG-17's dive,I just want to say there are limits for MiG-17's dive,that's all.

MiG-17's maximum mach limit is M 1.03

I didn't find the same sentence in the pdf. Of course I know this. I'm still confused where do the 'full thrust' and 'without any limits' come from.

I don't think I need to talk to you anymore.It is really boring to talk with a stubborn person. PPK-1 is g-suit,not aircraft component Ok,now I know this is made up by you.

Page 27 Please read it carefully. 'В апреле-мае 1953 г. все МиГ-15бис 64-го Корпуса были оснащены СПО, в июне на них начали устанавливать новые катапультируемые сиденья с улучшенной бронезащитой. В последний месяц Корейской войны МиГи начали дорабатываться под использование противоперегрузочных костюмов ППК-1. Так же, к концу войны, на сдвижных частях фонарей самолетов корпуса появились перископы ТС-27, улучшившие обзор задней полусферы.' Besides the same content above. 'Введение противоперегрузочного костюма ППК-1 - -Апрель 1953 г. - на всех МиГ-15бис.' I'm surprised you consider 'attention' as emotional word. I don't think it's necessary to go any further.My original intention is the appearance difference between MiG-15bis and MiG-19 is big/huge,but the appearance difference between MiG-15bis and MiG-17F isn't big/huge enough,there is nothing to do with performance. I'm waiting for your reply.

Attention,that's the text I quoted.Of course I know MiG-17 is longer. Maybe I didn't express it accurately enough.I think the appearance difference beween MiG-15bis and MiG-19 is big/huge,but the appearance difference beween MiG-15bis and MiG-17F isn't big/huge enough. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://i.4pcdn.org/tg/1508239255358.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwid-OWzk-z_AhWBKX0KHSe1DBIQFnoECCYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0sGtnjwlruDgF4Skjq5uRN https://arsenal-info.ru/b/book/1198779448/27 http://flibusta.site/b/500730/read Attention,that's the text I quoted.My original intention is appearance,there is nothing to do with performance. Time for me to ask the source. I have never said this.

Lim-5 Day-fighter (licensed MiG-17F) Lim-5P All-weather interceptor (licensed MiG-17PF) the radar was RP-5 Lim-5R Reconnaissance version of Lim-5 Lim-5M Fighter-bomber developed from Lim-5,60 built Lim-5MR Reconnaissance version of Lim-5M Lim-6 Modified version of Lim-5M,40 built Lim-6bis New fighter-bomber version developed from Lim-5,development began in 1962(A total of 70 Lim-6bis bombers were built, some previously built Lim-5M and Lim-6 aircraft were converted to Lim-6bis before Lim-6bis began mass production) Lim-6R Reconnaissance variant of Lim-6bis Lim-6M Fighter-bomber converted from Lim-5P since 1971(The RP-5 radar and all associated equipment were removed from the aircraft, but the radome remained,without drag parachute) Lim-6MR Reconnaissance aircraft, conversion of Lim-5P MiG-17F is MiG-17 with afterburner. 'The serial MiG-17 fighter had many differences from the prototype. Don't forget that ordinary MiG-15bis have been converted into prototypes. The prototype did not differ from the MiG-15 except for the wings and vertical tail.' Though he said 'many differences' here,I think different people have different opinions of 'how many' should be called 'many'. 'The first production series of MiG-17 fighters began to leave the factory in August 1951. In October, the aircraft entered combat units for operational testing. The first MiG-17s were mainly used to perform air superiority missions and escort bombers in simple daylight weather conditions. The flight characteristics and piloting techniques of the MiG-17 did not change much compared to the MiG-15, except for the behavior of the aircraft at high transonic speeds and in the transonic range. For experienced pilots, mastering the MiG-17 after flying the MiG-15 is not a problem. Only five weeks were allocated for retraining.' Later batches of MiG-15bis had PPK-1 system. Yes,I do.MiG-17PF has 3*NR-23 cannons.

I don't need you to tell me what I want.

It seems that MiG-17PF isn't MiG-17 in your mind.I didn't say I don't want MiG-17 in DCS.

I guess it's Bf 109 E.

Mig-19P's radar was RP-1 originally then upgraded to RP-5. The radar of MiG-17PF seems controversial,some sources said the radar was RP-1 then upgraded to RP-5. I use DCS more as a study sim,so I don't care much about whether it is useful.

Of course I knew the differences.

I said this more from the perspective of a consumer.I mean I hope I buy a module and get MiG-17F and MiG-17PF. Yeah,I have. Do you mean MiG-17PF?The radar of MiG-19P in DCS is RP-5 and the radar of MiG-17PF is RP-2 according to Wikipedia.

Since there's already MiG-15bis in DCS,I think MiG-17F doesn't have much difference,wish for a MiG-17PF.

Only taking modules made by ED into account,we have 4 allied aircraft now,plus F6F is 5,while we only have 3 axis aircraft.At least give us Me 262 first.

Please no more allied aircraft,we have 5 allied aircraft now,plus F4U-1D,La-7 and F6F is 8,while we only have 3 axis aircraft.

From

P-47D-30 was released on 5 June 2020 after Fw 190 A-8(released on 7 June 2019) and it doesn't match the map.

I didn't want to say too much in this topic.Why should aircraft modules developed by ED match a thrid party map?It's impractical for ED to add plenty of sub variants of aircraft to DCS.ED developed 7 WWII aircraft modules from 2012 to 2021.It takes ED years to develop a WWII aircraft module while for IL-2 developers they can make 10 aircraft and a corresponding map in 2 years.It's relatively quick for IL-2 to add sub variants.It cost $49.99 for a warbird module in DCS while for IL-2 10 aircarft plus a map cost $79.99 and they have 75% even 85% off.Will you pay $49.99 for a sub variant?If ED made many sub variants,will you pay $49.99 for each sub variant?I would rather pay for new aircraft other than sub variant that doesn't have much difference.And I have to wait for a new aircraft module developed by ED for another few years if ED decided to make a sub variant that doesn't have much difference.If I had to choose a Bf 109,I would pick F-4 or G-2.And I don't think ED cares much about whether a aircraft module 'matches' a map.P-51D was released in September 2012 while the third party Normandy map was released in May 2017,people fly P-51D in modern map for almost 5 years.It also cost ED years to develop a map.The Channel Map,which was developed by ED,was released in June 2020,almost 8 years after the release of P-51D.IL-2 aircraft did have a good 'match' for map,they can fly in historical environment.But for me,I only care about aircraft.In my opinion,DCS WWII focuses on simulating aircraft systems while IL-2 focuses on mutiplayer game.In other words,DCS is a flight simulator while IL-2 is a flight sim game.And ED isn't just developing WWII aircraft modules,they are very busy.So don't bring your IL-2 thinking to DCS.