dcn

I think currently all the modules in DCS are greater than 80% real, while DCS:F-35 is infinitely close to 0% real. I don't know why so many people say this, the first third party module is Belsimtek's UH-1H.

If ED insists on launching F-35 module, I suggest DCS be renamed MAC, then we will all shut up.

I don't know why so many people think DCS F-35 is better than FC3...FC3 is still based on solid documents,while DCS F-35...

Do you support ED launching F-35 module?

Maybe ED can't make much money from us old players, so they need gimmicks to attract new players, a lot of new players.

Now it seems that the J-8PP has already foreshadowed this day.

It is these people who demand 'historically correct' plane sets and maps that ruined DCS WWII.Why are these people so demanding of DCS WWII?When Phantom was released I never heard anyone complain about not having a Vietnam map.

Merry Christmas!Glad to see the update.When can we see the tutorial video like cold start?

Comprehension?I read it from discord I/JG7_Moto and two people in this topic also mentioned it.

So the development of La-7 was frozen is just a rumor?

It seems that La-7 has become another M3 Corsair.

This can't explain why there is only only mod(Lancaster). I think the most important reason is that most developers are not interested in WWII,Crosstail is developing A-1H but it's not WWII aircraft,people seem to prefer scenes like Veitnam more.It's actually more profitable to develop WWII aircraft because it's much easier to develop than cold war aircraft and the price is not much cheaper.(I know this statement may not be accurate because information about WWII aircraft may be harder to find, but in terms of aircraft system complexity) Additionally, the difficulty of developing DCS modules may have made developers unwilling to develop WWII aircraft.MSFS has more WWII aircraft than DCS. IndiaFoxtEcho and FlyingIron are more willing to develop MSFS products.

It's a shame there are only two third parties developing WWII aircraft module for DCS,there even aren't many people developing mods.

Would appreciate it if you could provide me the source.

I think the answer is yes but I don't think any developer would be willing to do it and ED may not approve it.

Sorry I don't know much about the F-111B, it is too heavy as a carrier based aircraft. I am looking forward to the land based version.

Of course I knew this.It has never been in service.And don't discuss too much content unrelated to the title.

J-8 PP set a precedent.

Awkward.Sorry I didn't read it carefully.

Sorry, I just saw it now. Thank you for your industrious work over the past 11 years! Don't doubt the significance of everything you did, it really makes things convenient for many people. There are always some unpleasant people on the Internet, maybe taking a break for a while is also a good choice. I will never forget you and your contribution, thank you, Silver Dragon. Best wishes.

Seems to be F-16A.https://stormbirds.blog/2024/07/25/heatblur-and-indiafoxtecho-announce-f-16a-for-msfs/comment-page-1/#comments

Bell:air Grumman:cat Vought:corsair Boeing:fortress Curtiss:hawk Douglas:sky Lockheed:star Republic:thunder

Of course not.

God please give us more Axis aircraft...

If it's because of me, I'm sorry, I respect him quite a bit.