Ronin_Gaijin

It's OK. They are training missiles.

Muchas gracias senor

Daily MiG-29 Russian 9.19

Could you please share the article for those that do not want to become members? Photo for attention.

The story per Yefim Gordon. (1st image) The story per Yakubovich. (2nd image)

Daily MiG-29 Slovakian MiG-29AS 9.12A

Daily MiG-29 Russian 9.19

Daily MiG-29 German 9.12A Same jet as above

Daily MiG-29 Peruvian MiG-29 9.13

Daily MiG-29 Slovakian MiG-29AS 9.12A

Daily MiG-29 Slovakian MiG-29UB 9.51

Daily MiG-29 Slovakian MiG-29AS

Daily MiG-29 MiG-29 9.12A East German Air Force

Daily MiG-29 Russian 9.19

Daily MiG-29 Russian 9.19

No, I have not. I am only interested in weapons that exist/existed.

Ranges and flight profiles are the same as with the R-27 family. Regarding tracking a target moving in three dimensional space, logic stipulates that you use the same code you have (in DCS already) for the HOJ feature of the R-27R/ER.

It homes in on radars working in STT modes like Kh-31P does in the game for ground radars, as well as it homes in on ECMs like R-27ER does in the game. The only thing to add it to make it home in on radars that work in TWS modes. But I am sure your Subject Matter Experts know more than me on this.

The developers in the past have admitted that the R-27P/EP was in Soviet/Russian inventory all the time. Will you be bringing it in the game when the 9.12A comes? Relevant photo.

Daily MiG-29 Russian 9.19

The above message means little. Any proof to that?

Officially adopted February 1994

Daily MiG-29 Polish 9.12A

I could not agree with you more. If we are aiming for a proper simulation, we need to be able use the 80s Afghan infrastructure and NOT the late 2000s NATO made one. P.S. This is how Bagram looked like in the Soviet conflict.

Daily MiG-29 Polish 9.12A