Fran11player
-
Posts
16 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
369 profile views
-
Yes, they did. And they did not talk about future contracts as you say, check properly: "To avoid such issues in the future all 3d party are now required to make the game files available in case they are no longer able to support their product"
-
So, the clear thing we all get to understand is that, after all the Hawk mess, ED promised us that something like that will never happen again, and it is going to happen again unless a "positive outcome". So, ED plainly lied to all of us. GG ED.
-
Ok, then I consider my previous question clarified. No Razbam modules will work in version 3.X.XX unless an agreement is reached. ED shall prepare huge refounds then.
-
@NineLine Please, can you tell, fair and square, if already existing (and paid from many) Razbam modules will work or not in upcoming DCS 3.X.XX versions? Thank you very much in advance.
-
Neither did the nukes on the MiG-21 and we have them anyway Realistic does not mean "exactly as the reality", but that could perfectly fit into reality. Giving us the R-27EA for the MiG-29A would be absolutely realistic and plenty of more joy and choices for players and editors. If someone still do not agree, we will have some funny discussions when capabilities of F-35A FF are fully revealed and someone may talk about "realistic things"
-
Then, if the MiG-29A never used ER and ET why incluye them but no EA??
-
Nobody wants to talk about the R-27EA Alamo C, which actually was into DCS about 20 years ago and removed just because?
-
Here I attatch the TacView file so, if keen to, you can give me advice. Tacview-20250523-182701-DCS.zip.acmi
-
Do you have acmi file or something to see? I just tried to do with the Su-27 (with MiG-29 FC radar you cannot block the bogey long enough) and cannot launch the missile before 35 NM / 56 kms at 35.000 feet M1,4.
-
If you take a look at the game's encyclopedia, this is what it states. (Sorry for the Spanish, can be understood anyway). nullEven more important than the speed, I think that the range is absolutely nerfed, being the true real range of the missiles up to 130km, and also the Gs, which are up to 26 Gs in the 27ER. To make things more even and fair, proper numbers have to be implemented in these missiles.
-
I am going to rescue this topic because I noticed that R-27ER has a Mach 3 speed in DCS while all the sources say that its true speed is 4,5 Mach. Any intentions to fix that?
-
Good morning mates. Wanted to know if there were any plans to include (or any special feature) some of the LSK's training ranges and grounds, to have something similar for the red side as we have with the NTTR. Things like Wittstock, Torgau, Juterborg or Gross Dolln could be amazing additions, specially now that the MiG-29 could accompany the map release.
- 3 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
Fran11player
-
Fran11player changed their profile photo -
Planes disappear at runway when landing
Fran11player replied to Fran11player's topic in Bugs & Problems
Thank you very much for your answer. I have been trying with almost every capable airport in the map and I came with one that is able to taxi the Yak-40. These two were Evreux and Conches, if someone is interested. Here I let you some pictures, including a beautiful formation landing of MiG-25.
-
Hello guys. I am currently editing a Cold War campaign on the Normandy map (I know you purists, but please don't mind me) and when I set a transport plane like Yak-40 or An-26B to land at a French airport they land well, but they suddenly disappear, like they have been evaporated, instead of starting to taxi. I have tried at various airports and the weird thing is that fighters like the MiG-25 land and taxi succesfully. I don't know if it is a bug that you knew but just in case. Thanks for the attention.
