Jump to content

Fran11player

Members
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Fran11player

  • Birthday 02/06/1995

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS
    IL2
    MSFS
  • Location
    Spain
  • Interests
    Cars (combustion ones, the real ones) & planes

Recent Profile Visitors

348 profile views
  1. Neither did the nukes on the MiG-21 and we have them anyway Realistic does not mean "exactly as the reality", but that could perfectly fit into reality. Giving us the R-27EA for the MiG-29A would be absolutely realistic and plenty of more joy and choices for players and editors. If someone still do not agree, we will have some funny discussions when capabilities of F-35A FF are fully revealed and someone may talk about "realistic things"
  2. Then, if the MiG-29A never used ER and ET why incluye them but no EA??
  3. Nobody wants to talk about the R-27EA Alamo C, which actually was into DCS about 20 years ago and removed just because?
  4. Here I attatch the TacView file so, if keen to, you can give me advice. Tacview-20250523-182701-DCS.zip.acmi
  5. Do you have acmi file or something to see? I just tried to do with the Su-27 (with MiG-29 FC radar you cannot block the bogey long enough) and cannot launch the missile before 35 NM / 56 kms at 35.000 feet M1,4.
  6. If you take a look at the game's encyclopedia, this is what it states. (Sorry for the Spanish, can be understood anyway). nullEven more important than the speed, I think that the range is absolutely nerfed, being the true real range of the missiles up to 130km, and also the Gs, which are up to 26 Gs in the 27ER. To make things more even and fair, proper numbers have to be implemented in these missiles.
  7. I am going to rescue this topic because I noticed that R-27ER has a Mach 3 speed in DCS while all the sources say that its true speed is 4,5 Mach. Any intentions to fix that?
  8. Good morning mates. Wanted to know if there were any plans to include (or any special feature) some of the LSK's training ranges and grounds, to have something similar for the red side as we have with the NTTR. Things like Wittstock, Torgau, Juterborg or Gross Dolln could be amazing additions, specially now that the MiG-29 could accompany the map release.
  9. Thank you very much for your answer. I have been trying with almost every capable airport in the map and I came with one that is able to taxi the Yak-40. These two were Evreux and Conches, if someone is interested. Here I let you some pictures, including a beautiful formation landing of MiG-25.
  10. Hello guys. I am currently editing a Cold War campaign on the Normandy map (I know you purists, but please don't mind me) and when I set a transport plane like Yak-40 or An-26B to land at a French airport they land well, but they suddenly disappear, like they have been evaporated, instead of starting to taxi. I have tried at various airports and the weird thing is that fighters like the MiG-25 land and taxi succesfully. I don't know if it is a bug that you knew but just in case. Thanks for the attention.
  11. Has it been mentioned already the fact of considering the addition of the King Faisal AB? We don't have any Saudi Arabian AB while it's Air Force is one of the most powerful around the area, and also suits perfectly the Strike Eagle
×
×
  • Create New...