Fran11player

And so we will pay for it gladly.

Yeah, I guess that only happens on English cockpit, but it should be corrected anyway. On Russian is everything ok as you say.

Check the 4 red little marks just right to the altitude and speed indicator

Miles, knots, feet and NM are metric now?

Here you can see the thing.null

Then I guess is a problem with metric system and english cockpit.

Want to point out as well that the altitud warner and the fuel range are yet displayed in feet and NM respectively no matter if you chose imperial or metric. Thing to fix.

I can confirm that the map affects directly to the radar performance, specially the ability of locking in RAD mode. Or at least I am having so much that impression. It is true that Caucasus is the one that makes it perform best.

One manual is for sure the one from Alan Wise, but what is the other?

Steam indicates end-of-offer the 30th. Is the date of release?

Neither did the nukes on the MiG-21 and we have them anyway Realistic does not mean "exactly as the reality", but that could perfectly fit into reality. Giving us the R-27EA for the MiG-29A would be absolutely realistic and plenty of more joy and choices for players and editors. If someone still do not agree, we will have some funny discussions when capabilities of F-35A FF are fully revealed and someone may talk about "realistic things"

Then, if the MiG-29A never used ER and ET why incluye them but no EA??

Nobody wants to talk about the R-27EA Alamo C, which actually was into DCS about 20 years ago and removed just because?

Here I attatch the TacView file so, if keen to, you can give me advice. Tacview-20250523-182701-DCS.zip.acmi

Do you have acmi file or something to see? I just tried to do with the Su-27 (with MiG-29 FC radar you cannot block the bogey long enough) and cannot launch the missile before 35 NM / 56 kms at 35.000 feet M1,4.