My_Name_Jeff

Gib J8 Side note, any chance for a helicopter from deka? Been into rotary wing lately.

Was getting back to dcs from sc, and showing my friend a stall and recover. Found out it was extremely hard to stall and flat spin (was around 10k ft). I was able to get a flat spin around 35k, but I don't remember it being this hard stall. Was there a flight model change?

Got it, thank you, I contacted a 3d printing service and their minimum charge for product is 50. I'll contact the other guy to see what the metal filler is about, since Im getting the tilted extension, it'd be safer to go for something sturdier. Thanks anyway.

Do you, by any chance plan to sell these, as I do not have a 3d printer and my school, even if it does I probably won't be authorized to use it for private purposes.

You gotta be more creative man.

Hi, I'm trying to connect my device with my computer, I was able to get it working couple months ago, my 3 tablets just arrived and wanted to test them out, and it just won't work, please help.

No, default opening alt definitely won't place them in the center, I will get you a track this week, the trk I have on my other post didn't have the dispensing action, but it had weird flying action, but yeah, no, tried it couple of times, default alt definitely won't place them on the center of pp points, even for a nice weather. Edit: I need to confirm this, since someone's saying other wise.

Well, best wait for an answer from either deka or ed.

That will definitely make it better, but we still have to consider the block, since this picture ain't showing brm rockets and I personally would not like to see it removed, just saying.

I thought it was by design, that's why I stressed about fixing the impact azimuth so it can actually line up the target, but now you said cbu97's sub-munitions are hitting center, I'm confused, is this just another ed's careless mistake? @uboats

Oh, and one of my gb6 disappeared for no reason at least from my observation, that's not the main point of the post but I just want to make sure it's not some other bug I accidentally discovered.

GB-6_IA.trkWas testing out GB-6 heard it was fixed, it is indeed, though the impact azimuth part is not working properly as shown in the track. (Unless I'm missing something in that case, please point me out.) This might prove important since the opening attitude is increased, minimizing at 800, and having tried a couple run, a lot of my sub-munition went to waste gliding somewhere else. In this case, usage of IA might be essential, rather than for fun like before.

It...it's known? Since when?

I recently encountered issue such as, trying to manually enter pp coordinate after previous target was destroyed. I found my weapon acting dumb after I manually change the coordinate, behavior such as, going to the same target, not going to the target at all and landing somewhere that's couple nm away from the target, etc. I would like to find out if it's because I missed a step in terms of manually entering pp coordinate, or things in that category. If the conclusion is it's a bug, I will go record a trk and start a new topic.

Check weapon alignment, by default when you enter anti ground mode, it should be on the sub display of right mfd, you'll see a count down, make sure the count down is over before launch

Apparently no one reported it, I started a new topic in there.

The new problem with GB-6 is that the HE variant is usable, but the sfw variant seem to understand itself as HE and fly the path direct to the target not above the target to release submunition. It will still detect its height though, and when it's at the correct height it will still open, but in the case where it fly straight to the target, it just misses it. See track for detail. GB-6.trk GB-6-1.trk GB_6_3.trk

Copy, Thank you, I'll take a look there probably someone already reported gb-6

Apologies for the ignorant mistake, so what could be the reason for them not to get fixed. And can you confirm all deka can do is report and wait. I want to know that since I want to see if there's a better place to report these problems, I think uboat mentioned some other place in order to gain more attention from ed. True, I still remember the scene of f18 missing all 154. Not sure how long it lasted though

But all deka can do after testing is to report, than it's all in ed's hand. That seems really unproductive to me, especially in the situation of runway bomb where it's the only weapon of it's type in the game. I doubt ed even care about it.

Thank you.

In sp mode you'll have to achieve a lock before slewing, now I don't know if that's how it should be but that's how it is now. So you'll have to aim with you plane first and lock than slew.

Thank you.

I've heard ed control the weapon file on some other topic, I just want to confirm since I've only been in the dcs community for less than 2 years. As in the developer has no right to access anything on that file even if all they want is to fix it, and it's solely because of ed that this is happening?