Supernova-III

yeah, maybe not lower than fixing L-39, but yes

Yep But I am pretty sure that ED knows about toe breaks regardless of our proofs

here and there...

Here's my proof (timestamp): @WORLD, please stop saying it doesn't have toe brakes.

AFAIK, there is no documented way to set aerobatic task for AI in mission script. I'd like to request to provide us this possibility.

oh yes. Once they release G.91, they will start working on another one... Thus not having resources to support G.91, and MB-339

Senaki-Kolkhi, 998.5 hPa. Altimeter reports:

nope. Senaki-Kolkhi, 998.5 hPa. Reports this:

pinned this to the topic, to not loose

@MiG21bisFishbedL thank you for your comprehensive review!

hm, narrowing field of view helps

oh, really. I just didn't know. Will add it later!

well, it's not that simple. Actually, I like planes that do their mission. But flying a slow fixed-wing aircraft particularly in DCS is a bit breaking of immersion for me. I'm suffering from lack of sensation of speed in DCS, mostly because of its graphics. So flying something slow like A-10 makes me feeling that I fly helicopter. Flying a helicopter makes me feeling that I fly a hot air balloon. And so on. Same speed values feel different, say, in MSFS.

added to the post. Actually, should "slow" be considered as a weakness in light attack/cas/coin scenario? It seems rather the opposite. The ability to fly slow is rather a feature.

Hm, I probably should include this one. What about its flight model? You mean incendiary bombs? As I mentioned earlier, C-101 has one type of such kind of bombs. UPD: not really valid, probably didn't know that, thank you. Is this because this is prohibited weapon or something like this?