adi-Michael

I have the same problem with ATI HD 2900 PRO, anyone have resolved the problem? What is? driver problem?

Awesome!! Great Job SnowBird2 ! In my team we doesn't see the time of being able to use it :lol: Congrants!

I Love the A129 Mangusta, but it's not so popular as the AH-1 Cobra or Hind.

Hello to all I add a list of feasible modifications in the interest of the community. These are some modifications that many users waiting to improve this simulator: 1. Fix 120 missile and f-15 radar performance. 2. Fix aspect ratio defaulting after a graphics change in game. 3. Simple dedicated server interface non-graphical, with script or other functional program that can enable the server by control panels. 4. Compatibility with Vista and modern graphics cards 5. Troubleshooting in FMs and Missiles and planes. 6. Add New ground object and terrain set with the ability of improving it. 7. Increasing or adjusting missile Performarce (All Missiles) 8. SCREEN PRINT ON-OFF server setting. 9. Adjust the multiplayer system for in-flights Refueling. Bye

Hi there people!! Nice to see good news!! WOW :thumbup: Hope in a great things here!

WOW let's dance :thumbup::pilotfly:

Hello all I have a question for some expert that has already used dedicated server for Lock-On Flaming Cliffs. My team is trying to put a dedicated server on-line, but we need some helps to make function this program, or something of similar that can make the server through command lines scripts . We are trying this program: http://www.verbalass.com/dedmac/ But when we start on Lobby the Automate Lock-On and Lock-On Launchers, the game starts but don't switch to server and don't load the mission. I think we are mistake something but don't understand what ..:cry: Did Someone already using this program with a dedicated server ? It works ? We could ask if you can send the correct scripts to us? In the opposite case, which types of other programs come uses beyond to this, to making the server through command lines ? Hope someone wants gives to us some helps ..:helpsmilie: Thanks in advance.. Salutes to all

Fortunately all don’t think so . Only last serious simulator on the F-16 aircraft that has been created is Falcon 4, a dated simulator of 7 years . The comparison with FC cannot be minimally made that is in all way more advanced. The strategy of the Eagle Dinamics puts into effect them is legitimate, to create a helo simulator before in order to sell at Russian market, and then subsequently if the thing goes fine, to expand their sells with a F-16 falcon to the rest of market to Europe and for United states. At least I hope that he is something of the sort. I think that the better idea later than release of BS, is that to balance the simulator with same Aircraft or means for both the coalitions. I mean to create a western multirole fighter an f-16 or f-18 for example therefore it would be all more interesting for average parts. It would be corrected, then to create also a western helicopter but we could be pleased also only for the strike-multirole aircraft. If instead the idea is that only to focus the structures of the modern Russian aircrafts, then it would be the case, definitively to eliminate from the simulator the F-15 and the A10 , because would not have more sense to hold them its inside, creating a perfect Russian simulator and only this. I’m sure that the Eagle Dinamics will have wider views widths this argument, making the just choices in its economic interest and for all the community. One thing is sure in agreement with X-man, will have to wait and to have patience.

hi Boberro. This happen because you are out of the auto-lock range. When you lock a target manual reduce the gate size to 10 (10meters) and maintain the object over lock, it's the same to have the auto lock. If the target moving, you have to put the target designator just little over the tank or the object, if you are near the target (about 10km) the auto lock will function. The dimension of gate lock have to change based on the dimensions of the target. It imagines to use this gate lock as for example as the old camera: If you set up in wrong way the objective the photo will comes faded, the same for gate lock if you set up a wrong value as dimension of the objective, the target will locked more difficultly. Sorry for my bad english..:smilewink:

lol wow good work:thumbup:

THIS IS A GREAT THING.:thumbup: This idea to include all the improvements in an just only complete package, it's really interesting. However it would have to create something efficient that works, many mods make references with more files together ..

Thanks for adding our links frazer!:thumbup:

WOW! great work!! thats awesome!:thumbup::lol:

Woaa I like it! :thumbup::smilewink:

THESE SCREENSHOTS ARE REALISTIC!! :lol::thumbup::D:smilewink:

Good news Vekkinho, this agrees with the promise that has been made by ED, that is about the release of simulator within this year. :thumbup:

Nice! :thumbup:

Hi SilentEagle, Any news about the model of F-104? Can you post some other screenshots about your excellent job.. Thanks

The mod didn't function with Loman 2.1... Any solution? I don't use Modman because this one creates many problems to my PC

WOW!! SOUNDS GOOD!!:thumbup:

Hello Birdy, your mods is really good but would be appreciate create a only one mods "standard for all", that as an example comprises all the external improvements like those of TekaTeka and the others.

It's a good start, you just have to optimize the model on details:thumbup: Taking this as example.. It's not my job.. http://aycu03.webshots.com/image/15442/2002496586174132849_rs.jpg

DAMN! :eek: R.I.P. :bye_3:

Any idea about the mods will be finished? I think that the work near the effects and airports are extremely realistic. Great Job

I don't have words.. It's REALLY AWESOME! :thumbup: