Shinigami

Well a simjunkie friend of mine likes to fly Havana-Montreal the two 7 hour legs fly so I'm guessing that some people thinks that fast forward isn't part of the simulation. On my side if I don't get the FF feature I don't play cause is very tiring to see 2h the same landscape, also the bombing part is always more fun than the going or return fly

Well if they make DCS-10 that is only a close air support plane way wouldn't they make a SR-71, is just a which like any other. But more than a SR-71 they could make a Recon version of all the planes and then yo get to do a recon mission and a bombing or intercept to. All they have to include is the camera, ENLINT, SIGINT etc... pod's, the aircraft recon missions is alway cool to do cause you have to penetrate the enemy defenses, and no the sat aren't always in site for recon, and some time they are blinded by clouds or the enemy.

Well if they thinking in making again a bomber plane at least make a F-117, I liked the old one the DOS version the one that before start ask you if you have a monocrome or a 6 color display sht I'm getting old if no one remember that one.... Shinigami Out....

The one I was asking is the 4 barreled variant of the one in the picture yea that's the one....

the most difficult part will be the knowing how the system work, cause if you know how it work is not very difficult to implement. Sigh!!! It would be very interesting programing that sht, I which I could work in it. Shinigami Out...

1+ and add something like semi 3D like google earth for viewing were to put the tank's and other's stuff. Shinigami Out...

in FC 2 ???? Dam I which I could buy a TraKir 4 at least I only have the webcam mod with a code revision of my self

Thanks for all the info if you happen to come across with something more physic oriented that would also be great and AlphaOneSix you can post the info whenever you want I already told to my friend. Shinigami out...

Russian planes are more interesting than US cause any plane they decide to sim is alway one that never had a sim before

Russian planes are more interesting than US cause any plane they decide to sim is alway one that never had e sim before

I'm not in the University now, so when I speak with my friend I will tell you, Also you don't have some more specific about the dynamic of helicopters and the implementation it doesn't have to be of the mi-17. Thanks for the info.

thanks GGTharos if you know other sources that would be great also if you could tell thous guys of the tread that also would be nice.

sorry I mean the Kransnopol not the Krisantema and the US version is XM982 Excalibur don't remember the German one.

Hi: I'm a system engineer student, A friend of mine is doing his thesis on simulating a Mi-17 and he is not as fluent in english as I, and to make the history short he wans to know is there is some info(thesis,book,paper,articles anything is useful :)) on Helicopter dynamics's it doesn't matter that the info is in russian or english, or you guys can give to him some direction in were to find info. Thanks in before. Shinigami Out...

Add also some bunker's and Silos for IBCM deployment

didn't know

Yea that one, now I remember that's the good old cuatro bocas AAA(in cuban :D) or 4 mouth in a very lose translation of Cuban-to-English. That sht is also used for infantry combat, I want one of thous

Add the Krisantema artillery shell for the Rus and the US and German version of the indirect fire projectile laser guided.

Bueno no importa aunque sea que modelen el submarino completo y solo lo usen en superficie Well it doesn't matter's at least they model the complete sub thought they use only it in surface

I would also like to include the Akula,Borei and Lada class submarine, also I like that they model the hole submarine not only the up side, cause in the real life the sub are alway under water not own surface. Also open a new tread for artillery shell's and munition, I have some request. Shinigami out....

Yea in recent event view I know what are you talking.

Lol the hole world use the metric system (they don't tell it the international metric system for nothing) are you that dumb that don't understand that!!!!!!!

No no that one

you missed the S-400 and S-500

Why not they have both Mi-17 and blackhawk so I'm thinking that is not much complicated.