Jump to content

Bucic

Members
  • Posts

    7249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

2 Followers

About Bucic

  • Birthday 01/01/1985

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS
  • Location
    Poland
  • Interests
    aviation, technology
  • Occupation
    engineer

Recent Profile Visitors

50776 profile views
  1. @nairb121As usual, great work! I clearly needed a refresher on that bug report. But I was kind of correct - the Max AOA report should be the master report. I just forgot it also mentions the AoA units problem
  2. For that there would have to have been ¿ a scenario where FM programmers had no data point for a specific flight condition available in plain AoA so they had to resort to AoA units gauge. Highly unlikely. It's also problematic from a bug reporting standpoint. It's just compounding variables. There's a dedicated documented and acknowledged bug report on AoA capability inaccuracy. The error is significant, to the point any other discussion on AoA in higher numbers seems a waste of time until that modeling error is fixed.
  3. What is that new hot competitor to moza FFB base? Forgot to note the name down.
  4. Ok. So let me tell you this - neither correlation matters. You fly by the units. Not only F-5E real flight manual doesn't bother with a conversion table or tape. There used to be a thread on this citing FMs of even newer machines with the same caveat. I am aware of the subject, I'm allergic to arbitrary, vague units and I've never seen a single reference pointing to a conversion data set. Because it does not matter in real flying. Hell, you can do a quick conversion yourself. Note down 5 pairs of units vs aoa (from the in-game info bar) and just dump it into excel. Insert a trend line with the option to reveal the equation. Done. I'm guessing it's always linear, so you can draf t a quick conversion tape like this
  5. Are you talking about units vs AoA mismatch or units-AoA relation real vs units-AoA in-game ?
  6. Interesting illumination.
  7. Well done! You've put in so much work into this!
  8. What?! Real Beryoza can't be used with the real aircraft's own radar operating?!
  9. "Approved by Ironhand!" Get some bucks for that staple! Quite an experience to witness this kind of progress in flightsim fidelity, isn't it? On the ground handling. Can we get a confirmation that the 29 actually uses the new tire and strut / suspension modeling framework, please?
  10. To anyone dismissing the feature please watch Bunyap's walkaround/familiarisation series. He had one at least for the F-5E (original release). Engage the extended attention span and try to feel the flow. I'd Shirley use it with VR every time I have an even slightly unusual loadout.
  11. Literally the last days... Su-22 Fitter - ostatnie loty w polskim lotnictwie / the last flights in the Polish Air Force - YouTube —
  12. Yes, there is a problem with the in-game Vsync. I wasn't much into DCS in 2025 so I didn't notice. Thanks for pointing that out. But the trees are problematic, still. In a less dramatic manner, check out the attached comparison. Less objects/world visible (mostly filled with sky) - much less FPS. If that doesn't ring a bell I don't know what will.
  13. This bug seems to be alive and well still in late 2025. I can put a single tree in the viewport, camera pointing down towards ground, where the FPS will be lower than with a panzer battle ongoing with a whole city in view. benchmark 2024-03-09 marianas f-5-2025-09runRTX2070.trk
  14. Probably full "arrival routine" with a very clear angle on the critical part. Air Show Radom 2025 - F16 Tiger Demo Team - Przyloty, treningi. - https://youtube.com/watch?v=kw9WdBsHpkc EDIT: Radom ATC - Tiger 1 radio comms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=negxHSChqTE&t=4677s
  15. Katastrofa Myśliwca F-16 Tiger Demo Team podczas Przylotów i Treningów d... - https://youtube.com/watch?v=u7gYKKNy5b4
×
×
  • Create New...