Zakatak

Damn :/ Is this present in any of the DCS games? The graphics are mostly stunning but this just kinda... hurts it alot.

The search function isn't doing justice, even though this has likely been asked. Pretty much any body of water that isn't at sea level doesn't actually have water in it. If you go near the surface of a watershed or any elevated water source, there isn't actually any water. You can see it a few 1000ft below you, as well as being able to see under-map geometry. It's... distracting. Also, Su-25 model has literal holes in it, anybody know a downloadable model?

I took on full Star of Vultures, not bad for a Surat, huh? Bushwacker remains my favourite mech. Strap on a duo of SRM6's with an Ultra AC20 (1x MG for anti-infantry purpose), you got yourself a tough little bastard that can brawl with whatever those trashborn throw at you!

I hate the feel of FSX, everything about it. The feel, the flight, the controls, the graphics, everything made by ED is smoother and "better". I feel like TrackIR is requirement in FSX because hatstick movement is so awful. Also, you can't use modifiers with your joystick. My Logitech Extreme 3D has 15 functions on FSX, and about 40 on FC2. You guys make one, I'll buy it.

Can we have DCS: Mechwarrior? I want to be able to hop into a Vulture or maybe Uziel, do a ramp start in my mechbay, then go kick some Clanner ass.

... Hmmm... OH MY GOD. DCS: Madcat (or DCS: Timberwolf for trashborn scum) I will spend 500$ for that game alone, hell yes I would!

Not gonna lie, if Eagle Dynamics made a civilian flight simulator, it would probably top FSX ten-fold. :music_whistling:

Answer in red. And, considering we haven't gotten to use the catapult yet, they want to give us variety. I am almost positive it is F/A-18. Whether it is the C or E is the only thing I'm wondering. Hopefully both! Hopefully we get to fly the CF-18 too. Canadian campaign is a yes please.

I once asked for the F/A-18C, but with VRS Superbug + Tacpack and the Seven-G F/A-18 simulator out, and even FSX Acceleration, it might feel overdone. Eagle Dynamics has NEVER done a tandem aircraft before, and its unlikely that will change. So F-15E and F-14X are likely out of the question. Leaving... F/A-18C/E, F-16 bl.52, F-15C, F-35 or possibly an attack aircraft. F-15C has been done in Lock-on already, and has no air-to-ground capabilities. F-16 would be pointless because FreeFalcon/F4AF already offer that realism fora lower price. F-35 and the F-22 are simply "too good" and "too classified". Not enough attack aircraft have the "famous" status of everything ED has done before. SO... Prepare for DCS: Hornet.

Are you me? Because I had the exact same problem to the detail a few days ago. Just uninstall FTNOIR entirely.

DCS: X-Wing Make it happen.

The CF-18 has been upgraded to AN/APG-73 standard, aswell as a new avionics suite, improved electronic warfare abilities. Canadian pilots receive more training then American pilots (not on par with Isreal, but were pretty damn good). We wouldn't be given "dumbed down" equipment because you have no reason to. We will not rebel against you, we have the budget, what is the point? I've seen F/A-18's get behind F-16's before, it can happen. The F-16 might win, but 'obliterate' is not the word to describe it. EDIT: It's just CAF now. No 'Royal' in it.

Any aircraft is better then the F-18 for a given situation, but no aircraft is better then the F-18 for any given situation. That wasn't contradictory. Read it twice. If you didn't see it the second time, read it again.

I got FSX: Acceleration for the Hornet, but i'm not satisfied :p By the way, if this is a F/A-18C module, can we play as multiple countries? US, Canada, Swiss, etc. Some will say the CF-18 is the A version, but we uprated them to what is basically the C version (APG-73 + AMRAAM compatibility). If we get to play as Canada, hopefully we enjoy some North Pole combat, fight off Ruskies coming over the top of the Earth to hit the US.

Your onto something, has that been done before? Online tandem? Rather then argue which version of the Hornet to have, let's just get 'em all! @the guy who cried Apache, never flown a helicopter sim before (where the hell is Black Shark?!) but I would love to try!

Never really considered that part. We don't even know how fast the plane goes yet (Mach 1.6 was a contract requirement), as not all the capabilities have been tested.

As a Canadian, i'm naturally biased toward the non-Super side of the Hornet. CF-18 for the win. It looks better and manoeuvres better, and I believe it has a longer ferry range. Don't quote me on the last part, all I know is that in a simulated dogfight, the Super Hornet had to bug out because it was bingo on fuel. Personal opinion, feel free to prove me wrong. This isn't my area of expertise.

I want DCS: Hornet! Just not... DCS Super Hornet. I don't like the E/F version at all, too big, too bulky, too ugly. Since the game is set in 2008 Georgia, the F/A-18C will still be in service, and that would be a funner sim in my opinion. :p Or perhaps we can have the A/C/E versions at the sacrifice of a little fidelity, I would be okay with that.

...although the English Electric Lightning wouldn't be so bad either. Easter egg aircraft #2?

I did this an it works. FLAWLESSLY. Thank you sir! Hell, I actually got a higher framerate.

I know alot of people hate the F-35, I know alot of people love the F-35. But we can all agree that it there is really nothing it can't do. I think the F-35 Lightning II should be a future DCS title and this is why. Diversity. It can do many roles, use many weapons, and would provide hundreds of gameplay challenges. F-35A would be a good way to start, flying what is basically an uglier, heavier, stealthier, equally manoeuvrable F-16. Then we get to experience some V/STOL Harrier-like gameplay with the F-35B. Now we are moving onto carrier landings in the F-35C. And next we conquer short, icy runways with the drag-chute equipped CF-35 (and play as Canadians, eh?). And when we are done all that, we jump in the F-35I and do it all over again in the Middle East. Also, it is an easy aircraft to fly so anybody could learn how to fly it without putting months and months into learning which switches to flick. Did I mention sexy LCD panels and an HMD? Since the game would take place in 2020, we might even be able to fight (and obviously die to) Russian jets like the SU-47. We might be able to fight alongside the F-22 Raptor aswell. Yay or nay? EDIT: Also, players with microphones could use voice commands like F-35 pilots can, and TrackIR can be used to kill enemies too.

I tried going to my video card settings and setting the Mipmap from "high performance" to "high quality" and I think that did the job. Still, the plane model has alot to be desired and I still think it is... wrong. Does the model not show any moving engine blades? Is the Avenger simply the a cylinder? Or are my graphics bugged?

Dammit, it doesn't work. :/ No option to 'repair' Patch 1.21, so I guess completely uninstalling and reinstalling Lock-on is the only way, ya?

Where do I find this again?

How do I change that? So you're saying I need to remove the "haze" feature?