-
Posts
604 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by II.JG1_Vonrd
-
Any idea which custom cockpit?
-
Confirmed by myself and 5 other pilots in our squad.
-
Also confirmed. There is tone but no lights which means we have no idea what quarter the threat is thus removing one of our (if not the only) SA tools.
-
Yes, emphatically!
-
Thanks 9! Would you please ask the team to work out something regarding being able to alter roughmets? It's essential especially regarding rendering of bare metal.
-
Thanks for the reply 9. Its good to know that y'all are working on some kind of solution. I do understand about the need to protect your property. Personally, I don't feel that we were overreacting due to having little to no information from ED about this issue and I hope that you understand our concerns. Please do what you can to regularly keep us informed about possible solutions, even if it's "we're still working on it guys, no news yet".
-
I have participated numerous times in the competitions and greatly enjoyed seeing what's possible given hard work by talented creators. The winning skins are now part of the default hangar and a (IMHO) real boon to the community. I hope to participate in any future competitions but there will surely be no such competition for the F-5. No, as @Mach3DS and others have said, it's just not possible to skin it as is... "Old School" methods won't work. I can live without doing the F-5 but my great fear is that any new releases (please, please, please NOT the MiG-29!) will be in the same category of non skinnable. Is there any time estimate to "until we do get something better"? Looks like I'm going to have to really push my desire to get on one of the module makers skinning teams... (hint, hint, wink, wink Developers).
-
Not when I can make a better product myself.
-
Ah Crap. What a shame. Perhaps the MV might be tweaked to read the encrypted files? Or a completely new MV? Even if possible it would be low priority.
-
I'm kinda surprised that we haven't heard word one (AFAIK) from ED about this subject. Livery makers have been commenting about since we noticed back in November that the S-3 was encrypted. I really hope that the comment by Waterman about pay skins is mistaken but I can't help but wonder.
-
This! My fear is that all future modules will be like this, without access to the edm file in order to load the module into the Model Viewer. This would make QUALITY user user skins a thing of the past. @BIGNEWY @NineLine, is this the way of the future?
-
@BIGNEWY and @NineLine I'd like to volunteer my services...
-
The unofficial "2025 and Beyond" video hype / speculation & discussion thread
II.JG1_Vonrd replied to Lace's topic in DCS 2.9
This! So, if the MiG-29 is doable, why not any of the earlier Redfor? The excuse that data is not available for them rings false to me (especially given the apparent availability of data for the MiG-29). There are examples of many Cold War Warsaw Pact aircraft throughout the Western hemisphere (and several airworthy examples). Saying that Russia won't allow their development makes no sense for a Swiss based company. Yes, DCS is originally Russian and many of the Devs are also Russian. Does this fact play into how DCS decides the balance of modules put into production? I don't claim to have any answers but I'm sorely disappointed at the apparent imbalance. Maybe it's just that they perceive the market for modern NATO aircraft more lucrative. But without an opposing force to use Western aircraft against, it's all just masturbation. -
OK, found them: {"HB_Char_RobinOlds_overall_highrez", DIFFUSE , "hb_char_robinolds_overall_highrez", false}; {"HB_Char_RobinOlds_Pants_highrez", DIFFUSE , "hb_char_robinolds_pants_highrez", false}; Should these lines be entered into the livery's description lua along with the modded (orange) "highrez" dds files into the livery folder in Saved Games or does it need to be a separate folder within the Mods folder?
-
Hmm, it crashes when I try to open the cockpit EDM. I'll try it on my other machine.
-
"Official" F-4E Livery Discussion
II.JG1_Vonrd replied to LanceCriminal86's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
You probably have to join the main Livery Art Group server first: https://discord.gg/mhYUj35A -
I don't see an edm file for the cockpit only. Do you know what it's called? I have a full description file generated from the aircraft itself but don't see any lines containing "highrez". Thanks for the help!
-
Thank you! Understood about being busy.
-
Gonna bump this one more time in hope of finding what files are used for the internal flight suit view. If I don't get a reply I assume that there is a reason for not divulging that info and will shut up.
-
"Official" F-4E Livery Discussion
II.JG1_Vonrd replied to LanceCriminal86's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
I could probably help but not for a while since I have a line of projects waiting. You should post your request at the DCS: Livery Art Group Discord: https://discord.com/channels/547961984658833408/929137570359697409 -
"Official" F-4E Livery Discussion
II.JG1_Vonrd replied to LanceCriminal86's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
This will be the next depiction of 37+22 in Norm90J and ACE configuration. Looks like they worked these aircraft really hard. -
Are they accessible to users? If so, would you tell me what they are and how to construct the lua?
-
I must be doing this wrong as the default flight suit shows in 1st person, not the orange. Does the 1st person view use a different dds than the one for external view (HB_Char_RobinOlds_overall.dds)? Is my description lua incorrect? Something else? @Zabuzard?
-
"Official" F-4E Livery Discussion
II.JG1_Vonrd replied to LanceCriminal86's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
Luftwaffe F-4F-53-MC, 37+22, SN 72-1132, CN 3722 of JG71 (formerly JG72) in painted in NORM 81B camouflage circa 1992. Link: digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3342755/