JABO2009

installed DCSW 1.2.0 , then CA without any problem. then clicked on Multiplayer , entered my DCS.com login data and clicked connect.... then the game crashes... Window: "DCS doesnt work anymore, Windows is searching for solution C:\Users\Tom\AppData\Local\Temp\WERFD9F.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml C:\Users\Tom\AppData\Local\Temp\WER1610.tmp.appcompat.txt C:\Users\Tom\AppData\Local\Temp\WER1640.tmp.mdmp" I even get the indication "Online" for a tenth of a second and then the game crashes pls help ! cheers

guys I have my 1.2.0 DCSW installed under C:/progams (X86)/DCS World when adding CA, whats the correct installation folder, that CA fits into the DCSW module properly? do I have to assign manually or does it find automatically? pls help thanks

thx mate

generally spoken: can we set up multiplayer sessions with only human controlled vehicles and A/C ? or is there always a mixture of AI and human controlled battle objects ? If so, how can I judge when flyin with my su25T of enemy territory if Im fightin against AI or humans? cheers

ok thx Nate

I will have a try on CA arms today, once I have time to download... as I only have DCSW actually installed on my PC, the questions is: with DCSW + CA bought, which DCS aircraft are flyable additionally because of the purchase of CA? the A10C from the standalone 10C DCS product? or the Ka50 flyable ? cheers

great to see some progress here ! keep up your fantastic work. cant wait to have it in DCS.

Nate, can you maybe tell us, if DCSW will be able to get modded via Modman or something similar in the near future? would be great.

good to hear that, thank you ! I modded my existing DCSW install with: - high res terrain mod - Ricardos Su25T pit - and 6DOF mod will I have to re-apply them on the this new version or will they stay? cheers Tom

same here ! this mod is almost a must a have for FC3 and generally DCS, IMAO

I would love to have both the Italian and Russian Version !!! For me its a beautiful airplane... though yeah, its kind of an ViperHarrierPhantomHornet mix, but anyway its has its own very special style http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJUJZN_xCoM&feature=related ...

man, how I would love to have a DCS Yak 130 module in the future !

fully agreed, comparing these two makes no sense. both will share the eye candy graphics of the DCS World and thats it I guess, FC3 will satisfiy the jump in and fly users, while DCS add ons will satisfy the hardcore simmers perfect supplementation !

mispelling changed, thx for that..

I understand your argumentation in the second point, but I think this is an issue which we all won't get rid of unless you close DCS again to 3rd party devs and only allow ED to implement their developments ... ...and thats exactly the opposite way which DCS wants to go!! the idea of opening the Sim to 3rd party devs is absolutley the right way to go , and via the DCSW basic module they found a nice way to easily plug future modules onto. Yes, the quality will vary , but: 1. I think ED will keep their hands on checking upcoming developments to fulfill a certain "minimum" and compability standard 2. I woundnt basically say 3rd party devs implements lower quality cause of lacking information. the whole DCS community is a large and great one, where much of exchange is taking place, also in terms of flight data, research data etc... if you watch the actual ongoing development process of making the L39 flyable for example, one really has to notice how many talented people are out there, sharing their knowledge and exchanging their experience here..that's what its all about I think ! 3. due to this clever DCS module set up, everyone can judge and decide by himself, if the delievered stuff is approriate for his demand in simulated depth is satsified or not. I prefer to have the choice than generally limiting the development possibilities cause of your point 2 concerns...

bright mod looks great !! can you add one more comparison pic? whats your loading time with brightness mod on ? cheers

hey guys, as Im a great fan of Lock On, since the Flaming Cliffs Add Ons came out, I basically agree here on the AFM idea. Yes, FC 3 should at least include the AFM model of the A10C and maybe add another new AFM to another plane, BUT !!! : No endless Clickology on FC3 cockpits please ! few basic clicks would nice to have,(though not really a must have) I think many FC 2 fans like the idea of simply jumping into a jet, start the engines, setting flaps, take off and ENJOY flyin' and the eyecandy graphics! not clicking throug a say 8 minutes start up process for all the systems and engine ! the Module Concept of DCS makes it possible for all the different simmers demand to have both: the hardcore simmers will go for the DCS single plane/heli modules like A10C and BS2 , Mig21 bis etc. but pls dont do this to FC3 ! I like what ED and all the 3P devs are doing, the complexity is amazing and wounderful, but for FC3 no ! to sum it up: 1.) FC3 should feature new high res 3Dmodels of all the main planes (there is so much stuff which can be taken from FC2 mods (combatace's 3d Suchois pls!) which partially already have been taken into the DCSW basic module like high res runways ) btw: (pls someone finally do a nice Mig 29 and F16 3D MODEL !!! this is missing for such a long time now and even still missing in DCS ! -> where are the Viper and Fulcrum fans here ?) 2.) FC3 should guarante compability to the other DCSW modules ( I know this was already announced) 3.) FC3 should ideally add the DCS A10C AFM to the FC3 A10A and A10C , but once again, not add the complex cockpit and systems there... 4.) the possiblity to set the pilot skill as "Player" for the non-featured aircraft in the editor should be possible without any modding ;-))) 5.) That being said: do we have any more info on possible release quarter of FC3 ? is there a realistic chance to have it still in 2012? feedback and comments on my thoughts very much appreciated ! cheers Tom LOFC2.0 DCSW Win7 64 Intel i5-2500k Track IR4 w. Track Clip Pro ATI HD 6500

is this just specualtion of u guys here or is the integration of a flyable L-39 (separate DCS L39 module) already official? would be great if !