Jump to content

Gaizokubanou

Members
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. In distance couldn't they just use sprites to represent infantries?
  2. I do not think that the nuke in World in Conflict was the best I've seen. It's graphically impressive, but there are too little dust blowing on the ground, the shockwave looks weak, etc.
  3. Why not? My mother is still an alien and my entire family used to be. We even have a government identification card to prove it! Anyways I think life beyond Earth is very much probable, but probable does not necessarily mean that it has to be.
  4. Thanks for the laugh Tekateka, that thing looks hilarious! :D
  5. Another speculation I've heard of was the payload theory, which is also mentioned on that website.
  6. Well the engine is cpu demanding, so I don't think extra eye candy will hurt that much, at least for newer rigs. And if it does, just turn the new feature off :D
  7. Reading the user responses from youtube is both funny and painful.
  8. I think explosions could look a lot better in LOMAC... :( sure on aircraft going at mach 1 wouldn't notice it from miles away, but from black shark I think it would be noticible. I agree that it's not a priority though.
  9. Why didn't we get to see the explosion from F4?
  10. Amazingly fun movie to watch. I hope the sequel comes fast :D
  11. 7900 GTX can breeze through the graphics for Lock On. You will have to worry about draw distance and water only.
  12. Well I realized that fuel air bomb in this game is kinda tiny. I expected one of those HUGE ones, but oh well it's carried by SU-27 afterall...
  13. I tried that and the para worked, but the explosion is still kinda tiny.
  14. I too was looking forward to seeing a huge boom with the bomb, but it was very disappointing. Does anyone know if ED cares about updating the explosion visuals by any chance?
×
×
  • Create New...