Jump to content

jbrking

Members
  • Posts

    136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by jbrking

  1. installed all the latest drivers. also i would just like to point out that these tests are done whilst all my graphics settings are on low and off. the only thing i havent done yet is reinstalled DCS. :helpsmilie:
  2. i upgraded my pc today ended up actually losing frames somehow in the process. all other applications however have gained performance. was running this.. Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) MS-7390 AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core Processor (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz 8192MB RAM AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series almost no change, i never looked at my frames with the original setup but with the setup below with details switched to low I am lucky to get 30fps. It doesnt seem to have improved much at all performance wise. does this seem right? Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) GA-990FXA-D3 AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor (8 CPUs), ~3.5GHz 8192MB RAM AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series any ideas would be great..:music_whistling:
  3. i upgraded my pc today ended up actually losing frames somehow in the process. all other applications however have gained performance. was running this.. Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) MS-7390 AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core Processor (4 CPUs), ~2.4GHz 8192MB RAM AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series almost no change, i never looked at my frames with the original setup but with the setup below with details switched to low I am lucky to get 30fps. It doesnt seem to have improved much at all performance wise. does this seem right? Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) GA-990FXA-D3 AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor (8 CPUs), ~3.5GHz 8192MB RAM AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series any ideas would be great..:music_whistling:
  4. i voted Sukhoi Su-35BM 'Flanker-E'.. would have prefered Su-30 though :noexpression:
  5. RAH-66 Comanche would be awsome :thumbup:
  6. ive seen a few posts with people saying that they would pay more $$$ if they released it as another module. dont put ideas in peoples heads.. i would rather save my dosh for a multirole fighter like su30, eurofighter or f18 anyway. :pilotfly:
  7. agreed.. but i kind of feel like we are left with an unfinished product. there are plenty of things i would like to see for DCS but for now im only suggesting that the planes originally listed as flyable within FC3 be brought up to the same standard as the su27/f15. there are a lot of 3rd pty models etc floating around but noone wants to install these at the risk of breaking their install. people want to see this improvements in the form of a official patch. id hate to see FC3 reduced to people having to download individual bits and pieces from several different online sources. having said that the 6dof cockpits and most of the features in FC3 atm were not even the original key features. only the f15 was listed as having the 6dof cockpit so really nobody has the right to complain. all i can do is wait and reserve judgement and then possibly my money. on the bright side as it stands FC3 is still a fantastic module that has surpassed original expectations.
  8. +1 well.. it would be nice. i would expect the su33 to be brought up to a standard similar of the su27 eventually.
  9. so should we expect this 6DOF cockpit release for the su33 in the form of a patch in the coming days? :noexpression:
  10. i'm assuming they will eventually officially release the 6DOF cockpit for the su33 in a future patch. is that correct? :noexpression:
×
×
  • Create New...