Joni

But is the GBU actually guided by the INS? Otherwise it wont make sense without laser. Right? Also read about the INS update being bugged as well. Is that true as of today?

I dont think that cVnav is necessary. Why do you think that exactly? Like I said before, as long as the meridians are disregarded (they are now in 1.5) we are fine. Since all calls, rulers, comms, etc. will be based on the grid, and the magnetic will also be based on the grid + - declination. So the only real problem here is that in this scenario we will never be able to use real charts, but in game it works fine.

So from the last post it says that the ins update is bugged, is it still?

Wow, thats a record bug in time.

Is the INS update still bugged? I know ccrp pi is.

Ooh, I saw so many videos working that I thought it was a new one. So the most intersting feature of the INS is broken a long time ago with no acknowledge from Razbam?

Anyone? Does this just started happening?

I think you are right, posted in the bug section. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=191454

I wasnt bringing blames up. Dont know what to say to all of that. The thing is a fact, but I didnt want to put it on anyone's back. Thanks.

The Huey is also fantastic, most of the bugs are gone in 1.5

Hi guys, Since last update the CCRP mode with mk82 is not working while doing precision bombing with INS offset. The bombs just fall at the moment you press the pickle button, they dont wait until the cue passes the center of the FPM. Thanks.

you need to perform autopilot and fbw test, after that if the decol light is still on is because you touched trim while on the ground, if so you need to click on the button just below de fbw a/a-load switch.

Hi, I cannot get this to work. Every time the CCRP release cue appears I press the pickle button and the bombs fall away, they dont wait until the cue centers with FPM as always. Is this broken or something? Thanks!

Wonderful information, thank you Art! I knew about inconsistencies in DCS maps but what I did not know was that not all modules show the same information in their compass, that is SO wrong and sad; because not only we dont count with a proper map system but also each module deals with it differently, wow. I guess that as long DCS disregards the meridians lines we're fine. The problem is when dealing with GPS or INS systems. I understand now why the Mirage doesnt have the correct spots even after starting from the air with "perfect" alignment. Other sulution will be as simple as make both rulers (f10 and me) show bearing angle from meridians lines and bearing angle from grid north.

Hi guys, Now that I jumped into the Mirage, I need to know exactly how is the information presented in DCS in regards of headings. Im a pilot and these things are very important for my sim experience. The ruler in the mission editor is in true or magnetic heading? the ruler in the F10 map is in true or magnetic heading? all the VAD charts say that there is a 6° magnetic variation in the caucasus zone, is it actually that way in game? Batumi for example has rwy 13 at a heading of 126 according to the mission editor, so that means that the true heading is 126 but the magnetic heading necessary to fly 126° is actually 120°. Thats how it is in real life, is it that way in game? Does anyone know exactly if all the inputs in the INS PCN of the Mirage are in true or magnetic heading? Im asking about inputs, not readings. I guess these are questions for ED more than anything, since user answers would be nothing more than a guess or a confirmed guess at the most. But im happy so see what the community thinks. Thanks a lot.

No, I put the lever in emerhency anf waited for the 5 min lox remaining light starts

Hi razor! I wasnt actually asking if it is simulated or not, rather than trying to know if it will be in the future. Oxygen level has a gauge in the right part near the warning lights. Check there and you'll see the level, when is 0 you should get blurry vision if flying too high, like the A-10C does.

I see oxygen is not simulated in the mirage (you can be at 45.000 ft with no canopy and no oxygen forever without passing out). Are there any plans to implement it? It'd give us one more real thing to take care of. Thanks!

Hi guys! Was this ever fixed? I got the Mirage and started wondering about a lot of stuff.

Yeap, I've been flying that way for more than a decade. Here in Argentina we dont have much technology to help. We fly planes without DME so you can imagine. What I enjoy of a sim is the technology, because that's what I dont fly in real life. For using maps and mind calculations I already have my RL flying :)

Oki doki. I dont think I fully understand the whole INS nature yet.

Yeap, I did an update with a TACAN station on thursday I think, and it works, not so good but it works. But I wasnt referring to landing obviously, but for bombing and navigating in enemy territory where there's no nav aids. I was wondering if you have IMC then perhaps they didnt fly that day if you are in deep enemy ground. By the way, the TACAN offset feature is a BLAST!! I've never seen something so simplified. If there real Mirage also has that, then it is a tremendous aircraft. Also the radar has some awesome features. I'll never jump into any FC3 cockpit again!

:huh: And how do you plan on doing that if there are none? :megalol: So ins bombing is not an option in IMC? Does anyone know how do real mirage pilots do to update ins on IMC?

And how do real pilots do to update their INS when there are bad wheather conditions? They just didnt fly that day? Thats something I was wondering since learned INS update.

Ok. After doing that, what I noticed is that only by pulling some Gs in two or three turns after starting in the air, the WPs get to drift. Is this normal? With just a few turns and the INS starts to suffer?