Siegfried

I am waiting this bird too. P.S. Can you edit typo in title please.

I can select version CC as volable now, but it gives me CTD.

Same here, I just updated now. :(

Bongo is right, I can asign an axis of my Saitek quadrant trhottle and it is like automatic system. I want a axis for control more realistic. There are other axis too in the cockpit with wrong axis too.

With actual system I can turn a rotary at extreme and the control moves slowly to extreme movement while I quit the hand for make another control. Now the trim or flaps are like automatic system. The problem is when you want let the flaps in a position you need find the central position of the rotary. Knowing both systems can be exploited, I prefer the P51's one.

I said before this problem with that axis in 109, but is not the only axis with that behaveour. Flap and other control in dashboard too. About the explanation for anti-exploits don't think is for that, because with actual system, I can use a axis controler and move to extreme for automatic movement of flaps. For add more reasons for implement a system like actual P51 controls. I have a Logitech G25 wheel without use and I thought fixed in a chair leg in vertical position simulating the wheel of 109. Ok in BoS y can't to use the axis bacause it only works with buttons but in Cliffs of Dover the 900 degrees of turn of the G25 (with FFB disconected) is GREAT. I am a little disapointed because I can't to use that in DCS 109 for trim or flaps. Using G25 for trimming the P51 feels soooo good too... In short, The actual implementation of that axis is more explitable than the P51. I have 1 lever of Saitek throttle for flaps and I only must move the other extreme and forget while the flaps slowly down. Don't forget look at the other axis of cockpit too.

I don't know about you speak. The 109 has preflight trim tabs and the 190 too. Where am I saying about give that feature to planes that don't have this feature? Where am I speak about give the 109 incockpit trims as P51??? I never asked unrealistic features to planes didn't have.

G940 with 20cm enlarged stick here. The plane feels very good. The new trim tab adjust feature is good for a little adjust of ailerons, add to the other planes too please and keep the good work Yo-Yo.

Maybe config file is blocked because this module is Beta and they need it is a fixed value. That way all data of people's reports are about the same model and more homogeneous. If were changeable, every people had his own value and the data collected would be a mess... In this case is fixed and we can see how threads like this was created.

Are you saying that I was correct in my guessing? I deleted my OP because I think I was wrong. It's logical, red is more danger that white but... Anyway, someone in russian forum I had read that the central position of fuel indicator is used for voltage using the red colouring mark "V". That's correct in your manual? It's true that FW190 and Bf109 had not any indicator for battery charge or voltage. Maybe this are the indicators.

+1 I already made this question. Maybe editing a LUA file we can disconect the feature, but I can't find where.

Yeah, my test are similar with Manowar ones.

I just test the 109 in lastest DCS World beta version. The time since total inverted to engine fail is about 8 seconds at 1.4 ata and 15 seconds at 1.1 ata with automated RPMs. Can you confirm that?

I did but I don't remember the exact numbers. Automatic RPM at 1000 meters. 1.8 ata was something like 4 seconds and 1.1 ata was 8-9 seconds I guess. But sure that is dependent of throttle position. I must repeat the test.

Or damaging engine at full throttle without MW50 activated maybe?

Post number 4 http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=140468

I just design a system with an auxiliary tank and a counterweight controlling a valve and damper. Also a valve in the cockpit so the pilot can overriding change. When flying the aircraft upside down, the counterweight attached to a lever is moved by gravity and changes the fuel passage to the line of the auxiliary reservoir. This deposit is a few liters and is designed to feed fuel to inverted. The damper is to be no quick move the counterweight to any movement of G instant negative, but only when flying inverted more than 4 or 5 seconds. We can also add an electric pump to create pressure in the auxiliary line. This pump can be linked with a switch on the counterweight to only be activated when put the plane inverted. The override valve in the cockpit as a backup is for something that the pilot can change at will. I do not know if this system will work well because I just design in my head, but it's pretty simple. Also you can add a fuel suction at the top of the main tank to simplify even more. This aspiration is in a Y junction with the main aspiration and counterweight manage change. It was nice to think about this and it took me five minutes to think it up. Maybe it's because they do not have any meaning or practical utility such thing in the planes of WW2? Besides, why talk about this if the 109 or any other plane had such a system nor the need for it. And keep in mind that not only fuel only thing that limits the flight time invested in an engine. Also this cooling and especially the oil lubrication system.

Anyone knows what LUA I must edit to disconect this feature?

In all new modules there are similar graphical issues. In promotional videos with EDGE they are not. I think it is a problem with graphic engine and will be fixed with DCS World 2.0

I think I told you in another thread that because of this bug, you can imagine that you have an electric motor in the engine start. At the end of the day is what you wanted, but now they are going to fix the bug and will leave you without "your electric motor".

Are you saying DCS 109 prop pitch is wrong?

I see that it moves but with pitch axis movement. At least in earlier DCS versions.

I forgot edit this thread. I was wrong with light colours. I guessed red was more danger and guessed that it was for forward tank.

Very high tides... Then there is still a chance for armageddon?

Ok, sniped by Yo-yo. Thanks. When I was collecting all these pictures I realized the detail of the air intake and now I see the explanation.