Jump to content

Destroyer37

Members
  • Posts

    459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Destroyer37

  1. Awesome idea! If I were making this I would include more of Saudi out to the west and most of Iraq since it has been a historical hotbed for military action and extensive air campaign's for quite some time now.
  2. I agree completely. The pedals in my SA-227 are almost 10 inches apart and its certainly no fighter but your completely right. I can only speak on the CH pedals because that's what I've always had. I am contemplating getting a new set, not sure which ones yet but I would like to have some good ones to use with the up and coming 4th gen fighters.
  3. Ill have to check this out! Thank you!
  4. Saw this beauty the other day during my walk around.
  5. I don't know that 3b would apply, but it is an interesting theory and everything seems to make sense!
  6. I use CH pro-pedals and they work fantastically, no curve either. Be gentle practice often!
  7. Is there currently any information regarding a timeline of these products?
  8. Doesn't hurt to ask right?!?!?
  9. Agreed, it may be a long shot but has anyone from ED ever tried to contact Chuck Yeager? He is active on facebook... I've sent him a question regarding this subject. I will let you know if he responds
  10. I may have and then again I might not have, unfortunately we have to take everything that is written in this forum as black and white with no interpretation whatsoever. Its hard to get peoples tones or emotions in writing at least for me. Let me know if you find anything interesting as I would love to continue to discuss this with you.
  11. Best of luck to you sir, just because this is a video game doesn't mean that professional airmen haven't had a say in this thread already.
  12. Then perhaps we should leave it up to official documentation, and professional airmen the likes of which typically know what they are talking about...
  13. Pretty consistent to six fifties from what I can tell.
  14. I see the yaw you are seeing however if you reference the follow up shots of 2 there is no yaw whatsoever which makes me think that the pilot was hitting his rudder to get onto target at the last second.
  15. Starting at 4:02 guns and rockets are firing, check out the building in the back ground. Recoil from a single .50 M2HB is 500lbs of back pressure. That's what is shaking the plane. Not the rockets. Fact.
  16. Judging by the other allied aircraft in the cam I would say that there is a high probability that this footage is in fact from a P-51D in the PTO. I am also seeing single launches of rockets, with no apparent recoil.
  17. Thanks for all the information everyone!
  18. Thanks.
  19. Bravo, Captain Orso very well said. So with all of this should we expect to see in some reasonable amount of time a correction made to the rocket flight model in DCS?
  20. I know 476 is based on real world, I'm just curious where I can find quick reference material that is unclassified to make my flying a bit more procedural and accurate...
  21. Where did you find checklists for the 10c?
  22. And just to be clear I agree with the OP, there should be a forward pull if anything, certainly not recoil.
  23. Wouldn't the Carl Gustaf blow a hole in this argument??? <- see what I did there?!?
  24. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=145003 This may help FSK
×
×
  • Create New...