Beeroshima

Good thing for me people that have a clue and facts don't find me that way. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Post a screen shot of the dcs radar with undetected aircraft on it. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Show me where this mod adds things to my radar. Show me. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Again false....this mod doesn't add anything to your radar. Teamspeak "puts sound in your ears telling you stuff you didnt know" zomg the hax! Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

So is helios and tacview cheating because I don't see them mentioned in briefings. I play multiplayer quite a bit. Never seen those mentioned. Probably because I'm such a cheater....eyeroll. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Yeah because the official forums in the mod section are a great hiding place...it might be new but again, youre reaching. Hidden? A month from now, who won't know about this? Hidden? Seriously? Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Well the developers didnt make ts a part of the game. If you report enemy positions using ts (a third party program) instead of chat, youre cheating, right? Give me a break. You guys can't be this dumb. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

The problem is, you again make wild analogies. Sharing information is like increasing the range of missiles? No. Not even close to the same thing. One system shares information. Your example changes performance value. Your example is piss poor. All of the head peckers are making assumptions that arent true, have little or wrong information on how the mod works and even less factual data. What percentage of players use teamspeak? Tell me. Are you assuming or do you have raw data? Your assumptions make your argument invalid. Again you call it a "game changing hack" which assumes that it is. You fail to demonstrate any compelling argument for that case whatsoever. Your claims are misinformed, anecdotal, and lacking any data or evidence. In the real world, we call that Conjecture. It's worthless in any forum that matters. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Tacview isnt restricted to data that is client side only. This program is. Do you realize it isn't showing you anything other than what your plane has already detected. Ffs. It doesnt reveal anything that would otherwise be unknown. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Jesus christ man, tacview exports info that you wouldn't have yet, such as enemy positions and locations. It gets the info from the server and makes it available. This program doesn't do that. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

If im not on teamspeak but you and your buddies are, and you use it to communicate and employ tactics, do you have an unfair advantage? Are you using a program other than dcs? Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

You idiot, by that definition, teamspeak, trackir, helios, tacview and a load of other programs are hacking. It doesnt give you any information you dont already have. How many times do we have to go through this? It doesn't reveal any info that isnt already obtained by the player. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Youve got to have one to begin with to run out of them. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

One of the few valid concerns ive seen regarding this mod thus far is does it simulate loss of communication between aircraft. Does L.o.s. affect its ability to communicate if youre in the mountains and what not. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

I choose to export all of my guages and instruments using helios and then modify the way I interact with them on separate monitors. It's not any different. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Again, you fail to make any point that its cheating. You just keep repeating yourself as though quantity of your statements equals quality. It doesnt modify or change any gamefiles. It doesnt access any information that isnt already available and displayed to you. Have you even used the mod man? Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Fwiw, the a10c keeps me busier than an f15c, but then again, the f15c keeps me busier than the ka50 with its fully clickable pit. But, that's all apples to oranges. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Id answer you but yesterday when we were debating, you decided making a point was too much effort and left. Kinda like you're doing in this discussion. To answer your question though, yes I play multiplayer. I dont find flying the full clickable cockpit airframe any more difficult than the fc3 "easy mode" planes. But then again, i use hot keys, have a hotas warthog, trackir, and 4 monitors. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

F15 pilots fighting mig 21's or m2k's in real life probably would be easy mode too, though. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

And herein lies the biggest problem with this mod. Ignorant people who have no facts and a lot of misinformation are showing up and spouting off their opinion as fact. This is precisely why I would like intelligent conversation from those who are informed to happen in the thread regarding blue flag Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Great points. I dont demand that the mod be allowed. I just think it's better if intelligent, informed, rational discussion be the basis on which its inclusion or exclusion be determined. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

But he struggled with 120's so they're obviously op! Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

These are issues that are worth discussing for sure! Finally someone is using their brain. I'm not sure what the effects of distance or LOS do to the actual Link 16 used in f15's and id bet the RVE guys would be open to discussing the issues. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Then do it. If they don't use the resources available to them, then that's on them. I fly the 27 fairly regularly. I enjoy the aspects of both platforms. I'm not upset about it being there. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

I heard this mod gives you command of satellites with laser beams. Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk