Cyb0rg

RTM :D

I agree with you. Besides, soon or later someone will make a mod with a clean canopy.

Always Ramp start. Unless iam trying somthing new and no time, then i'll start airborne. Starting the aircraft is half of the fun. :smilewink:

Harrier?

After install 1.2.10.32582 Update 3, i can load the tutorial ramp start mission with acceptable frames rate (inside the cockpit when looking at both migs on the left i have 22-24 FPS). Happy camper here. :thumbup: Edit :

IMHO you should wait for EDGE.

Just a heads up for a possible issue with this gpu fans. Edit : https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=183618.msg1318906#msg1318906

:cry:

Yeah, ive read it before in those overclock forums, didn't do it yet. Must do.

At night you see less detail and also there's less objects to render. I think there's an old thread explaining this, IIRC you can even change a lua file in a way that you have the same FPS at night and during the day. I wonder what's your FPS using the in game ramp start mission inside cockpit and looking at the 2 migs at your left. I have 15. EDIT : 10 before overclock :(

Bowl of cereal.. means logistic, I would go for a C-17 or probably a better assumption would be the C-130 that's all over the world and it's kinda old tech witch allows a PFM and ASM. :)

PFM ASM MIG-29? :bounce:

Couldn't agree more. Actually never liked overclocking my CPU always had it at stock frequency 3.16Mhz. But now decided give it a try. Sooo.. made a small investment and bought one of those : After a few youtube videos and overclock forums here the results : Having this setup up for 2 days now and looks rock stable :thumbup: Now I am just waiting for the LN FPS fix, EDGE and hopefully the skylake won't take much longer... EDIT : got 5-10 FPS increase in the sim.

Realistic 99.999% (i don't mind the camgun switch though).

This is the Ramp Start mission in the tutorials with simplified lods : Here 10-11 FPS. Same if I make a close up. And now a little bit far (mouse wheel tik) gives 40 FPS. I don't mind have orange 21s. :(

Same here.

The version with no exterior 3D mesh solved the FPS issue. But the other version (lower mesh than the original) didn't do much, maybe 3 or 4 FPS increase, also one lose landing/taxi lights and no helmet-visor too.

This is a ATC problem. AI needs improvement.

Good to know . Tks.

Some bugs still alive and performance need some optimization. Aircrafts modelled with such high level of detail are products that will sell forever. :thumbup: Yes, they did a nice job indeed. Congrats LN team.

Besides, F-15 had 2 engines and MIG-21 only one... you can not compare both.

Out of curiosity, seems that 15km is the f-16 service ceiling. Go figure!

Here http://www.pcworld.com/article/2686164/oculus-rift-crescent-bay-prototype-hands-on-a-vr-alien-waved-at-me-and-i-waved-back.html they talk probably 1440p witch is a little better. Edit : snipped