Jarlerus

Hello. A recurring issue that some players complain about is loss of performance after patches, and in many cases (anecdotally) I've seen that the tip to delete the Shaders and FXO folders so DCS can rebuild them helps. Could ED make the clearing of those folders automatic after patches? I think this would help with a lot of random performance drops for less technically engaged users. I don't know if this has been contemplated before, but I'm taking my chances here ^^ //Jarl

I too have seen the gear down bug.

EDIT: Seems all my problems where due to some update. It jumbled my SUPPLIERS-lists. Reset and resave solved the issue. plx remove post -.- /Jarl

It means Frankenplane. A fictive module. :((((

Yeah, my template does not look anything close to that template :P I must have some old one, or accidentally overwritten it at some point.

Found it! BUG: HAWK Template is missing the PCP!

I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, or if this is a bug. I place Iranian HAWK systems on the PG map from Template. They never fire at any enemy targets. I tested with the SA-2 templates, and they do fire. So it's specifically the HAWK that misbehaves for me. Any ideas what I might be doing wrong? //Jarl

THIS THIS THIS ALL OF THIS! #noSciFi-F15 !

I mostly prefer older gear. It's better because it can then be used to "roleplay" older versions of the aircraft! That said, Why Not Both?? :)

Freezes Today I had 2 freezes. No trackfiles at all where saved. I only got this log-file of the second freeze. I flew the MiG-21 - started one up, switched slot, and started another one up. It's the 3rd time the last couple of weeks I've experienced freezes like these. Both as Server and as Client. First time it froze for me was just after I hit a GRAD truck on the ground with a GBU. Second time I was flying around in an MiG-21 and setting up a kh-66 run. Third time (this log file) I was sitting on the ground, just started up. //Jarl Freezes 2020 05 08 dcs.log.txt

Hi. I'm interested in Cold War settings as well, although my group does not have any Cold War squadrons - yet! When more CW-modules come out, I'm sure it'll be easier to actually have one up and running. In the meantime we fly the existing ones "when able". Here's an example of what a mission/event in our group can look like, Main effort is still on the more modern airframes though. Take a look at our recruitment material, if you're interested ^^ Even if we don't do CW as our main focus now, it is a plan to more of it in the future. We just need to find more like-minded people. //Jarl P.S. Just saw you where US-based, so we might not be a good fit as we're EU-centered.

Cool! Now the big questions is instead A2G capabilities. AFAIK the german ones never had much of that. //Jarl

If one goes by what the Wiki says, Block 10 was the first (german) Typhoon that could fire the 120's (so the one in the pictures could be a B10+?). And then I heard other, UK, sources say that the UK Block 5 was upgraded with 120 capability as well. The whole Typhoon project is a huge nest of versions and test versions over multiple decades, so I would not be surprised if everything is actually true xD And yes, they are still exploring. Read their FAQ :)

Yeah, it seems that the capabilities of different tranches/blocks also differ from country to country. For example, AFAIK, UK Block5s have AIM120s, but the German don't. I'll leave it unspecified until they've decided on exact version =) They are still exploring what they can actually do; https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=267626 //Jarl

T̶y̶p̶h̶u̶s̶Typhoon back on the menu! //Jarl

Ah! Cool, thanks. I'll mine this at some point ^^ //Jarl

Updated with the A-7E :) (I hope it's true ;D ) I've also made some updates on the Weapons page. //Jarl

Yeah, but the licensed US copy had a better looking cockpit. ;) And most helicopters have had long service lives :D //Jarl

* updated released state of JF-17 * Also gathering info on when modules where released into DCS OB. :) (I don't know this, so please share if you know! ^^ ) //Jarl

The AB render distance is very short, making it a non-factor for visual acquisition of other aircraft with NVGs on, and making it pop-in suddenly at short distances and at certain zoom-levels. (Reference: The F-16) Suggested fix: Make the visual signature be observable on realistic distances with NVGs, to at least manage the unrealistic pop-in effect of it. //Jarl

Спасибо Да. ED: Что вы думаете? ^^

Это то, что я прошу их всех. Они только спекулируют. Нет источников. Вот почему я размещаю этот вопрос здесь =)

Thanks, I'll do that. //Jarl

Здравствуй Член моей группы утверждает, что у Акулы есть радио на коротких волнах. Это потому, что SPU-9 имеет опцию SW (KB). Это так? У настоящего есть это? //Jarl (Above is translated with Google :O ) Original message: ------ Hi A member of my group claim that the Shark has a Short Wave radio. This because the SPU-9 has a SW (KB) option. Is this so? Does the real one have this? ------

I'm looking for (any) proof of this claim. Do you have any? If it can be proven, a smaller question would be: Why did SRS move it from their normal sets of radios to the "extended radios" option? //Jarl