Jarlerus

I have this as well. If I exit quickly after starting, it exits as normal though. Only indication I could notice is that it works normal if I exit before the menu music ends (the music only plays once, btw, and then it stops).

Probably in 20 years, when they update all the ship framework code ;)

+1

@Cobra847 Can you comment on the state of the Viggen pre-order feature-lottery-thing connecting to the F-14? ^^ I've been waiting for YEARS to know the result ;)

How about this, from their YT channel? :)

Updated with MiG-19 release and notes on MiG-23 versions.

Can I block accounts on this forum so I can't see threads or posts from the blocked account? :P

The version of the F-4E they said they are aiming at is a late 80's upgraded version. Details on that here: https://belsimtek.com/news/1787/ So yeah, it's going to be the end of life version. Limited to a service period of a few years. It retains all it's old weapons capabilities, so it's easily "spoofable" to older scenarios, I would think/hope.

Ah, cool idea. It will be interesting to see what ED comes up with for the animated deck-crew functions. That might have a overflow effect on ground crews :)

+1 on immersive effects on the camera - like shaking, buffeting, jolts (cat-launches). But I'd like the ability to tune the G-force effects - I don't want to battle those movements with my TrackIR (or in VR). Just enough to immerse, but not too much so to annoy the player.

Yes. So the solution is: Buy a better map (as ED wants you to ;) ) And then you'll have a legitimate case when you request these fixes! :D

The S-3 was never able to carry a boom-system. The S-3 is a very small aircraft, to start with. IRL it just can't fit a boom. And it's a Navy aircraft; They don't use the boom system. (probably because it can't be flown from a carrier).

The map already has features that are not there in reality. Like airfields that where shut down and built over in the 80's. So I don't think they share your ambitions.

What would it do?

Look to map DLC for better detail. There's no economy in making Caucasus better.

Why so sure about that?

Hydroplane Seaplane Flying boat. All viable english variants of the subject. At least it's not the italian word in english :P WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING YOUR POINT? :megalol:

Thanks :) What do you mean with "Is there an indication of what aircraft are flyable?" Is this what you mean?: Year-span color indicate: Green: In the game. (purchasable and flyable) Yellow: In development. Red: Wishlist.

The english work you are looking for is "Flying boat". :) And yes, the Canadair would be interesting to fly.

All aircraft in the wishlist section here. :)

I haven't seen this problem. What carrier are you using? And why not post this in, say, "Bugs and Problems" instead of in the "Wishlist"? :P

"- Free multi crew-capable aircraft for the introduction of DCS World to friends, to give them a quick intro to it to see if they like it. A small propeller trainer such as a Shorts Tucano for instance" Another seat in the TF-51 would suffice, with the option to "swap seats" mid flight (I know, not realistic, but a "quick-fix".) "- Another free map, even if it is a small one" Small maps coming in the MAC-pack. (there's no economy in releasing more free maps) "- When refuelling and rearming, you could have animated trucks that have to drive over to you from hangers, or workshops to deliver the fuel." Queue A.I. vehicles that get stuck on the way out to the player because "pathfinding is always shit" :P "- Animated deck crew for carriers" Being worked on - Wait for the Carrier Module. "- Search and Rescue helicopters that come and pick you up when you eject" Get friends and CSAR-script - Done :P "- Don’t just instantly kill the pilot when you go into the water. Instead, there should be a floating animation with a life jacket." +1 on this one! Pilots should be rescuable on the sea as well =) I guess it'll be done once ED makes CSAR a part of the game (Soooon.....) "- Landing lights are visible in the cockpit when the gear is being retracted, this should be fixed" I'd think you mean this is a problem for a specific module? "- Condensation vapours that form when breaking the speed of sound" AFAIK it's planned after they simulate air humidity. "- Freezing and condensation effects on the windows if the correct heating is not applied" AFAIK, these effects are now up to the module maker to add. "- The weather system should be overhauled. Clouds need to be made to look much more realistic...." Clouds and weather overhaul is planned (Did you read the road map before you made this list? Doesn't seem so :P ) "- The ability to exit your aircraft normally and do a walkaround, pre-flight checks, etc… (This would be especially cool in VR)" This is a standing wish by a loud part of the community - Not a big ROI on it though - I'd guess that's why it's not done. "- For us British folk, the addition of British fighters such as tornados or typhoons." As _always_ : Module choices are up to availability of Documentation, Developer enthusiasm and ability. Wait until a dev asks for feedback on airframe choice: It'll keep you more sane over the years flying in DCS... "- Also, the Hawk should be given to another developer to be finished, as a T1.a would be a brilliant addition if it was in a finished state." You assume there's devs willing to pick it up, and you assume that ED has accsess to the code. (AFAIK they don't - They said something about it I think.) //Jarl

+1

This! :)

What would that be, as you see it?