Amuro

Chengdu J-10 歼十

CH Pro throttle works great with the MSFF2. I have a MSFF2 too and use it with the throttle sometimes. It is a really good stick, only problem is that MS no longer support it so no software to adjust the force settings and program the buttons. The X-52, especially the Pro version, looks really nice, but it is not as precise as the CH sticks, and after a few months pots may start to spike, happened to me and that's why I replaced them. CH Products are the opposite, may look ugly compared to Saitek, but function flawlessly.

I had a X-52 non-pro before, but it stopped working so I replaced it with a complete set of CH fighterstick, pro throttle/pedals, and love it. You can mix and match with Saitek stuff, but you will not be able to use the control manager software to combine non-CH input devices, which could be a problem if the game you play only sees one controller device.

Please explain why not then. And check out this, looks like Crysis aren't gonna benefit from having more than 2 cores either: http://blogs.pcworld.com/gameon/archives/005860.html

I don't wanna see another one. I want fixed wing.

Of course, for multi-tasking the more cores you have the better, but I'm talking about the game itself. If the game is not multi-threaded it won't run better on multi-cores, period. In fact, it may run slightly slower on a Intel non-native quad-core than on an equally clocked dual-core dual due to the additonal bus overhead and/or bad thread management in the OS.

Wow, that's a nice mod.

Of course, for multi-tasking the more cores you have the better, but I'm the game itself. If the game is not multi-threaded it won't run better on multi-cores, period. In fact, it may run slightly slower on a Intel non-native quad-core than on an equally clocked dual-core dual due to the additonal bus overhead and/or bad thread management in the OS.

Q: Will DCS: Black Shark be Vista-compatible and take advantage of multi-core processors? A: The initial release of DCS will use a heavily modified version of our TFCSE simulation engine that will run Windows XP SP2 and Vista equally well using either DirectX 9 or DirectX 10. However, DCS versions based on the TFCSE engine will not take advantage of DirectX 10 unique features or multi-core processors. We plan however to provide such features in our new simulation engine that is currently in development for later versions of DCS.

I doubt it. AMD is running out of cash in the bank right now. Has to borrow just to keep doors open let alone catch up with Intel.

I use complete set CH Fighterstick + Pro throttle/pedals. The controller management software lets you combine all CH USB devices into one virtual input device, so they can be used with games that only support one controller.

I built my current rig, a C2D X6800, 8800 GTX SLI, 4GB RAM, last December. Now, I'm ready for the 45nm quads. Too bad DCS will not benefit from multi-core, but Crysis will.

I believe there will be a printed manual available for purchase. It's really hard to put a big manual into a small carton box or DVD keep case.

Are they gonna stick to the "every 9 month" release schedule? If so, we might have to wait for 20 years to see some of the stuff added.

Voted for F-14 and F-18, love to see the E and F Superhornets. In addition, I would like to see the F-22 Raptor, F-35 Lightning II, and Eurofighter Typhoon.