ZioSam

RGR, goot to know those assets are going to be improved, my humble suggestion was to keep them in the legacy mode , while you work on the improvements, but something is always better than nothing, anyway congrats for the release, a very needed fresh air into DCS world units

TOR M2 can inherit all sensor from TOR and PANTSIR from TUNGUSKA they are kind of the same in DCS except for better performance. this is very disappointing considering that while they were a standalone mod they worked perfectly.... imho it should be fixed asap.

as per title, in CA you can drive around but i have not control of the weapons, the vehicles fire on their own even when it's a player driving them

yeah the demo mission is outdated i had to go to github and work from there editing the new script you find there

the script doesn't work anymore, even with the test misison you don't have the CTLD option in the F10 menu

DCS Nickname: 088 | {527th} Zio Sam Discord Nickname: ZioSam Faction: Blue Group: 527th Aggressor Squadron Modules: A-4, F14

the slot blocking feature never worked for me aswell

I had to ask a guy to manually rewrite the script for me

Same here... tell me how this bug can happens...

F10 GCI view is suffering from this bug as well, SA is really bad in 2.9 compared to 2.8, i played in Buddyspike with full ewr coverage and nothing appeared on GCI view

G2 and 4090 user here. To me with the mod contacts that are mid to close range are way easier and so way better to spot and track. Totally a step in the proper direction and imho blocking this behind the IC is totally idiotic since it should be worked and iterated more into the base game before. As usual a member of the community was able to provide what ED wasn't able to. I hope this time we won't lose another member for the stubbornness of the guys in the command room, since many prominent members doing scripting for the community as the guys behind overlord bot and others already expressed their frustration toward ED management and jumped the boat

Is DCS supposed to be a simulator or an arcade? Every step to make even CA more realistic should be done imho. There are a lot of people liking to simulate ground warfare and right now there are many stopgaps. If ED isn't interested or has not the resources to develop it to the next level, outsourcing ground warfare to some dedicated 3rd parties would be a really interesting way to go, with proper SAM modelling, MBTs, vehicles and why not... infantry. 3rd parties may have the dedication and time ED might not having atm considering how many projects they have to support

For the sake of curiosity...what was triggering the bug?

I remember quite some time ago that developers of SAM simulator tried to get in touch with ED to add a more realistic layer for CA players who wants to manage various SAMs, sadly no other news were shared after that

+1