Jump to content

OperatorJack

Members
  • Posts

    444
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by OperatorJack

  1. ED doesn't give a toss about the multiplayer component lmao. They need to fix missiles too.
  2. Not really because they're driving the prices up. So you're thinking you're getting a good deal but you're actually still paying full price. Source: F-5 on 20% "discount" is about the same price as the MiG 21
  3. If the intention is to have Blue Flag be asymmetrically balanced, then why not give RED better Air Defence assets seeing as BLUE has the more capable aircraft?
  4. I'll have you know I'm studying for my masters in Gender Studies and I will not have you trivialise my degree
  5. It's the competitive aspect A lot of Blue pilots literally only fly the F-15 because it's objectively the best aircraft in the game, which annoys me when I fly an aircraft I like and they act smug as hell. Also Red has more than enough cause for complaint. We won last blue flag and we were all accused of cheating because of one isolated incident (which probably didn't affect the outcome anyway)
  6. Blue gets outnumbered in the day for me (GMT) and then night rolls around and hordes of F-15s spamraam everything in sight
  7. The MiG 21's radar is far worse than the Mirage's and it's currently borked and still awaiting a fix. trying to use R3Rs just isn't feasable right now, as if it wasn't hard enough already.
  8. Things that never happened: the post
  9. Literally what disadvantage has blue ever had?
  10. There is literally no historical or technical, or even geopolitical reason for the M2000C to be limited to Blufor only. So if we are doing it illogically I'd rather have full asymmetrical balance. We have to deal with the MiG 21 being trash so why shouldn't blue deal with having a disadvantage for once Also my group extensively and pretty much exclusively fly Mikoyan aircraft so don't lecture us that there's a bleedin' 29S
  11. How about making the Gazelle the Blue attack chopper so they don't have the Ka-50
  12. lmao blue getting BTFO
  13. But there's a patch every friday?
  14. We were expecting IC and MiG 21 radar fix and got some vague additions of support and like 3 bugfixes
  15. Today's patch is a ****ing joke
  16. Trust me mate, there are people arguing it should be off for realism too. I agree it's shitty that it can be exploited but that's down to how incompetently implemented it is.
  17. lmao anyone who argues that no model enlargement is the most realistic obviously has never been in a real aircraft
  18. I've spent almost all my time on the server as a 21 flying out of Sochi with a buddy on GCI. My problem with the 21 is the radar is so temperamental in picking up targets off your nose, and I'm having trouble visually picking them up too
  19. Sochi is literally useless for REDFOR to hold. It's ridiculous trying to defend it when everything is at least 5 minutes away
  20. Yooo the server has been running for 4 hours with no restart and the lag is pretty bad fam
  21. Don't wanna call it out directly because it's pilots are immature and tend to call people who dislike their mount a butthurt flanker pilto
  22. Yeah, you'll not be able to see anything unless you pick it up on radar or its up your nose, which benefits a certain airframe :joystick::smartass::thumbup::music_whistling:
  23. WEW E W I bet it's F-15 pilots complaining about this the most
  24. If you pick them up visually and they can't find you on radar then they kinda deserved it tbh
  25. Mate, model enlargement isn't a hack. I've had problems in testing spotting A-10Cs that were 2 miles away from me so it's not exactly making it super easy to spot things.
×
×
  • Create New...