Jump to content

empeck

Members
  • Posts

    464
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by empeck

  1. Thanks for quick answer. I see your point. I just thought it would be good (for user) to keep one game ( ;) ) and integrate modules into one application. I have faith in ED though, I think they know what are they doing ;)
  2. I'm curious - why DCS titles are separate from each other? From the user POV it would be much better to be able to integrate them into single application, and add A-10C as next flyable to already available Ka-50. When more DCS modules will be available I think it will be very difficult to ED to retain online compatibility and patch previous titles that doesn't provide enough income.
  3. Standalone. http://www.a2asimulations.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=6&products_id=18
  4. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    :)
  5. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    I really like Accusim aircrafts. I just like flying an in-depth aircraft simulation. Most of my hours in Black Shark were non-combat. Just setup a mission without any threats, set waypoints, and navigate :) I fly warbirds in FSX just as they are now - flying and taking care about a plane. Accusim planes have cumulative airframe and engine hours. You have to constantly check manifold pressure, temperatures, rpm, pressures, etc. In each session you start the same plane you've left in previous one. It's an alive plane, and no other sim gives me that.
  6. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    This will be the best Spitfire simulation money can buy. :)
  7. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    That's why I don't play Il-2. There is a nice combat, and flight, but no aircraft simulation, don't know why it's called a combat flight simulator :music_whistling:
  8. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    There is so much to do in A2A's planes you wont have time to look for guns. These are the only planes that have really simulated piston engine. Beside there are many warbirds flying now, and none of them use their guns anymore. Consider it as some kind of GA plane ;)
  9. I don't think so. There won't be full startup procedure for example. I think it will be a survey, not study sim, Oleg said few times on yellow forums he don't want to/don't have funds to make high end aircraft simulation, but want to focus on combat. There will be some engine management though.
  10. IF ED would make an F/A-18E, which is doubtful. VRS F/A-18E is the best SuperHornet available on PC today. Honestly, if VRS would make DCS addon I'd buy it in a second, even if it's not 100% accurate. I've read many times how inaccurate F/A-18E is, but only once I've read what is wrong with it - from a guy who had a pirate copy with flight dynamics augmentation turned off :music_whistling:
  11. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    I believe it's Aerosoft's Lukla.
  12. empeck

    FSX Discussion

    Of course they are. Everyone knows FSX is utter trash :music_whistling:
  13. There are other ways to advertise your product than spamming three years old thread.
  14. This is old thread resurrected for marketing reasons only. I'd ban thesimulatorstore for spamming.
  15. OK, nice it's there, but it looks dead :noexpression:. There are few 3rd party FSX developers FB pages that are much more alive. I thought this is official site: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000735274184&v=wall
  16. I need new glasses :/
  17. I did it few times. I've added to my wall GA's trailer, and few Wags videos. It would be nice to see ED's official FB profile. Easy to do, and it's a free promotion after all. Even Fighter Ops has their official FB site ;)
  18. empeck

    Jet Thunder

    It probably won't be as advanced as DCS or Falcon is, but why do you assume it will be arcade game, not a sim? Have you played it already? Beside, ED won't make every interesting plane out there. It's good to have other guys who try to make a simulator. And they aren't charging for forums access. :thumbup: Even if simulation part will be on par with LockOn I'll be happy to fly it. Harrier? Carriers? I'm sold. :pilotfly:
  19. That's why I haven't experienced this problem :music_whistling:
  20. I know about Seven-G, I had 1.03 version. Can't wait for full release.
  21. I know it's not 100% accurate. But try to find another F/A-18E to fly on my PC ;)
  22. My point is that you are repeating the same thing over and over ;) My opinion? I like FSX. It's true, I can't run it full sliders right, but I'm quite happy with it's performance. Why I like it? Because it's the only simulator beside DCS that simulates an aircraft's systems and engines to the point that satisfy myself. I have few 3rd party aircrafts and fly them exclusively (A2A Accusimed planes, C-130, Superbug). Because it's the best simulator out there to practise carrier take offs and landing. With freeware HTR it's one of the best helicopter simulations, right after Black Shark. And it's the best simulator I can make my own planes for it. :)
  23. Yes, we know you don't like it. You've said it already few times in this thread only.
×
×
  • Create New...