ked

Hey guys, i've been trying the Su-33's auto pilot (ACS) and i have some questions Now you have to use the radar altimeter when you're at low alt and the baro when at higher alts which is Ok to me i just had a long time figuring that out. According to the early manual the radio alt hold should trigger the ground collision avoidance system if the alt is inferior to 50m or vertical speed is lower than -15m/s During my testing I came to realise that going outside of theese parameters would just disconnect the auto pilot. So i went on and tried to activate the ground collision avoidance mode first with alt 7 , and it would just put the plane up and the throttle down even when being in the flight limits (so alt was > than 50m and vertical speed > than -15m/s I'm wondering if it's broken or not ? I also used to do this a lot: put baro alt hold (H key) and then roll around so i could turn and keep my altitude, now you can't because the ACS is also countering your roll inputs. It's the same thing with refuel mode (and this one is a pain in the ass if you're refueling in a turn) Bug or feature ? I'm all for realism so if it's a feature from the aircraft i'm all for it, otherwise theese issues might be bugs and i'm happy to report them. Tell me what you guys think and have a great time with our Russian Shark PS: traps are amazing BTW, brakes seem a little weak and with the old carrier mecanics you can't really go to after burner without moving already. Is it gonna be better with new carrier mecanics ? are we gonna be able to hold our position with afterburner on like every good carrier based aircraft ? :)

Hey guys i don't know if it has been answered before but what are the capacities of the aim-54 against fighters ? I can't find much about that on the net

thanks for the answer.

So cobra, are you still expecting the F-14 to come out Q3-Q4 2017 ? :)

Damn it looks good but i wonder if we'll still be able to see that in 2017, looks like there's still a lot of work to get it on the shop

With the current state of the R27-ER and the R27-R, i would not ...

you should look at the video released by bunnyap there's a great exemple of remade physics for landings in the f14

ye i know i was wondering if JTAC lasing like in the mirage 2000c would work

Isn't the pod LANTIRN all about self designation ? They said they wouldn't do it by the release

Small question, will we be able to use guided bombs with JTAC pointing lasers on ennemies ? I haven't seen any statement about that.

oh my god i can't wait

R27-ER is easy to shake too

Depends of the distance between the ennemy and you. If this is a 27ER, forcing him to loose the lock on you should be enough but if htis is an AMRAM you'll need to wait about 30 seconds if fired at max range. Tbh sometimes it can be a good idea to pump instead of notch if you have no AWACS because you might get in close range without seeing your target. You might need to hide in mountains and get him with 27ET and EOS

yeah i didn't mention id but if the carrier moves (and it should) it'll get you a little behind so the last 500 meters you'll have to see if you need to increase your RPM a bit or decrease it

You need to be in nav mode, select the carrier in landing mode. Then you put the little circle in the big circle and you follow that until the landing. Speed should be from 240 to 290 kph, the flight computer will calculate it for you depending on the weight of your aircraft. There's no such thing as visual approach here, the landing mechanics are old and scripted so you'll just explode if you don't come in with a proper approach

Stomachs dont like negative G's at all either

Check this out : https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3080998&postcount=19 From this post: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=181660

some people also asked about lantirn, but this pod is way harder to implement so they said they'd just wait for ED to do it or wait till it's released and they can finance it (because this is not planned right now) And tbh we've been waiting too long already release the damn thing :p

we need PFM for the Su-33 and the mig 29

I was thinking about coding an ATC using speech to text in one way and text to speech in the other. Using simple radio or Universal radio to pass the audio on multiplayer servers. The only setback i found was the lack of good text to speech API. Everything i found having something different than a robotic voice wasn't free at all.

Any update on the Su-33 PFM ? Feels like we've been waiting for this forever :(

I agree, everytime i try doing BVR the fight ends in close range combat and i've got to finish the ennemi with R73s ... Something's wrong tbh

Hey guys, I haven't seen any anouncement about the catapults. Do you have any news about that ?

anyone ?

Hey guys, i was wondering if putting a lot of slots in a multiplayer mission would produce lags once running on a dedicated server or when a client is hosting. How does it affect performance ? I'm talking about 40 to 60 slots and less than 20 players in it at the same time. I've eared that it does affect performance, and that precharging models with static objects at the begining of the mission could help with that but tbh i'm not even sure