proletariat23

I made an earlier post about a drifting effect, after painstaking process of elimination I've found that any dual axis throttle without tuning will tend to create a bit of a discrepancy, in simpler terms, they don't RPM the same. tested on: x-55, x-56, warthog. was pulling hair out trying to figure if my pedals or something was happening hardware, changing the input on all three hotas in AXIS assign from a dual system to one under thrust, as opposed to having it split corrected the problem immediately. I would suggest anyone check it out, it may just be pronounced for me or I might not know how to tune it out.

atm observed effect is a bit of a drift to the "left" in the air and on the ground in all planes. Thought the rotation of the earth was being troll modeled or something. Checked all hardware and axis settings, verified with status indicator. The entire world seems to be moving slightly to the west depending on which map you're on. Thought maybe strong crosswind or some type of HUD drift C/O setting maybe but no, flew the hog, the flanker and the eagle, all doing it to the "left" of the initial spawn point. I even found a very straight road, lined up on it and tried to fly a straight line with visual reference, it's hard to explain, like a projection was moving by me, not that I was in a simulator. I've played flight sim for many years, the best way to describe it, it's like you have a left boot full of rudder without rudder or bank angle, so flying straight leaves you at an off kilter angle, it's most pronounced in the russian aircraft.

tell me more about the relevance of your stealth fleet as an Arabic state uses visual techniques to brown box your LO recon drone with the same chip family using only imported tech. hubris.

if you looked at what has been FOIA'd just in the last 3 months of works by men like MJR. Beers, L. Valone, the 412th's recommendations as per public record, the document entitled "SMARTSKINS" the dod program "CHESHIRE" all unclassified all uncontrolled, but this is the status quo of the minds. When is the last time you chimps went into a library? **** communism.

you didn't need me to post to discern those facts, unclassified and testament for all to see by the fountain circling group of bread crumbs hoarding dolts. I work, you Sim. :)

Philistines with very little actual, to offer. Proculi este profani, as we say. While you worship your scraps, I'll be over here, writing doctrine and hardware for the things you won't believe in till you're ordered to. the raptor will be wholesale replaced, with more than likely, another grounding for large scale skin and CPU reworks. Systems need vehicles, not the other way around. You all seem quick to live in the library of your mind and worship with the egotists and the status quo of what you know, happily accepting you factually know very little by design. philistines. Your hubris is both proof of our merits and cautionary tales of what blind dogmatic willingness to believe will get you in a conflict. DEAD.

smell the roses while they last home team. You can nonchalant from the armchair but the money and the minds tell a different story. Don't go flying your LO near the 300 there Mr. Johnson.

this was UNCON in NA as of now, I don't care what dassault wants to cry about. watch turn 1.5. Look at the rafale HUD, the timing on turns and where to put the nose is dictated by an ACMI catalog built out of boyd and riccioni and speyers work with EM in WVR fights. thats not a gun cross, it's a rear aspect shot creator. The rest of this video is not available, what you miss is the rafale climb through the clouds using its EWS suite and get within knife range of the 22, which was picking off targets BVR. This guy went NOE, used the IRST, used his pilot skills and the clouds, OODA'd all day, and killed this guy. the french were dis invited from red flag, btw, shortly after this went public. it might be worth noting, that the grippen, the EF, and the Rafale, with their delta sweeps and forward canards, each about 60% the size of a flanker or f-15, are considered the real successors of the USA's LWF program, because once these men who were told "no" were civilians they lectured and theorized with the best, for many years. Everything the AF ignored, the Europeans and the arabs did. teh f-16 is about 9 feet longer than it was ever meant to be, about 2000 lbs heavier and carries 4 less AA missiles than the Yf-16 that john boyd designed for air superiority over migs. NO, NO, none whatsoever aircraft has a combat catalog in WVR fights like the typhoon the grippen and the rafale, at least that are disclosed, and it is worth mentioning further that the EM theory work that boyd did was classified by the department of energy arbitraily because it contains the word "energy", so guess who doesn't get to benefit, US pilots. As of now, there is no known aircraft in the US fleet with a WVR combat computer, something considered standard avionics on 4+ gen fighters, although not very publicized and considered "need to know" by rafale especially. Rafale doesn't like that this video exists, which should make you want to watch it more. we are headed for a rude awakening

well I have to disagree, not to flaunt my bona fides, but the f-22 is currently being replaced, the DOD is blathering their mouths left and right, concurrently about the shitty processors and the lack of a production line for 22's. A dassault used an IRST sensor to cloud bait a 22 at red flag and kill him with a MICA IR. The 22 doesn't have an ACMI catalog computer, like the grippen, the rafale, and the typhoon, it uses an obsolete processor family, and in the event of catastrophic losses, it cannot be replaced. the f-22 came off a strip of skunk paper in 1971, and basically got the Boyd treatment thanks to the LFW and the fighter mafia through it's second stage of development, great, it became less shitty than the swept wing abortion it was meant to be, but still gets stalked and murdered by dis-invited french jets. The DOD has spent billions pumping optic and anti MW tech in the past 5 years, they have leaked a vast amount of both concept and logistical support into the halls of academia to speed up the process. Directed energy weapons, and certain LO techniques I will not divulge here are in the hands of export states, first party developer nations are working on airframes, sub orbital, cheshire, you name it. you're talking about the hegemony of a generation that has already been defeated in the black world, and exists in the uneducated public concept of what "stealth" means now. And I tell you confidently, gumption and XBOX level technology from the 2003's can observe your 22 and your 35 and your 117a...don't believe me, call the Serbians. good luck out there.

i don't want to disclose specifically what I do but I aggregate data from large sources... Dell MSRP'd the warthog down to 299.99 for 6 hours in the continental united states on 6/1/2017 and changed the internal sku, but this was pulled down.

This is the arbitrary I'm smart forum guy response huh? No, it's inconsistent, and cumbersome, and honestly needless. You could do all this, more efficiently in Visual Basic maybe if they hadn't been so focused on flipping 3D models around it would work consistently. You can also just set it with Dx as an axis or write a key file if your pants are that fancy. I'm really happy that you are happy with target. It's terrible.

its nice the rocker sucks and target sucks, so don't expect much joy there. I use it for a zoom as well and I just give it a huge deadzone so it doesn't jitter on return.

good source says yes, most likely q1 2018 sandbagged a bit because it might be supporting a major console vr release as well. cannot burn source

espana? anything stateside? thank you!!!

accuracy is my main goal. I only know of the x-65, which is a rare pepe. Advise?

do yourself a favor, and just don't. 256 clank gimbals with no lube are considered defective. A non lubed gimbal in an aircraft would be considered unsafe, a very low fidelity plastic clank dead center stick, with poor springs and poor design. the grip is the only thing worth salvaging. Find a cheap serial port one, run an eternal control board, just like CH shamelessly did from the serial port to the USB down mix, re-seat the entire stick assembly into a heart sensor, and you've got quality. CH is plastic, it's not metal. What I just described takes an hour, but also about 25 dollars in parts and a few years of know how and courage. I wire electronics and work on flight and avionics gear for a living, on the back of being an electrical engineer and tinker for 2+ decades. You can give yourself a warthog with a soldering iron and spare parts, but the real trick is going to be the drivers. I''m currently experimenting putting a CH fighterstick into the gimbal and base unit assembly of a 16000 m, rewiring and if necessary, writing a small script to tell the buttons to behave as digital or DX POVs. the main dificile is marrying the electronics, which proved to be fruitless/ convaluted. I will custom wire them with all new guts.

disagree wholeheartedly, used everything- CH sucks. They put a warranty sticker over the screw, which is illegal, by the way, they cannot prevent you from doing maintenance on a gimbal,they don't grease their gimbals, and their spring quality is very very low... OH and by the way, based on case law, a gimbal without grease, especially in airplane parts is considered not only defective but gross negligence... so logic that out. combine the above with the fact they use 20 year old technology and boom. I mean shoot,there are older stick designs, from companies that don't exist anymore that have better springs, better gimbals, magnetic sensors, and 12 to 16 bit tracking. there is some fanboy up in this mug. Buy one if you want to waste 100 bucks, they aren't worth more than 40. get an old serial port one and use a 15 pin adapter to usb 2.0, trust me it will work with their software...it hasn't been updated since 2006, and even then it was made it visual basic in 1989 or something./ CH is a dinosaur, the only reason they are a thing is because they've got a stick with 3 4 ways and an 8 way. The only compete there is thrustmaster cougar, x-55 , warthog, or x56. the trigger on all Ch products should have bankrupted them in 1997. Let them die.

Here is the reality; there is that OTHER GAME, the 16 year old one, with a huge roster , which is basically study quality, and a really good campaign. They are working on rift and vice support. They give that game away for free. The base vanilla is less than 8 American dollars. This is an eventuality, this WILL happen, your business model IS going to be undercut. And on day one when it does, you have to compete with every f16, up to five theatres , co op, dynamic campaigns, difficult AI... This is an eventuality, in business you look at market share and profit margin. You're about to lose the "plus cost "game. I'm not biased, I always eat. If someone puts prime rib in the table for free, who ya going to blame then? Money? Time? Dev cycles? There is reality, and there is idealism.

George I hear your point, which is why I said 100 bucks for FC3 fidelity stealth fleet, the 22, 117. The 35 is brand new, but when you realize one of the main features of the 35 is the 6° of freedom virtual hud like every plane has in a VR HMD with hud mode only anyways, I'm not quite as militant. Even all the block 50 through 80s have HMD off bore. In dcs off bore HMD plus hud mode only plus IRL HMD = 5gen

Or, they spent like 9 months working on one thing, and realized quickly that everything's they did would be incompatible with everything they've ever done prior, unless first they reworked those codependent systems in a way that would honor the new changes. This smells of naïveté directing. - a director

In a dynamic DCS WORLD the raptor and the nighthawk not only make sense, but are paramount to REALISM if it truly is the STATUS QUO. Having no competition is generally taken as an admission of being the best from your vanquished. Woe unto the vanquished, but you must seek new pinnacles or risk growing fat on the laurels. There is no reason dcs world should end in 1986, imho. Stealth aircraft are a real facet of doctrine. Same with advanced long range anti stealth techniques and ground based ewl. I mean, if you want guys do the U2 or the SR71. It's dcs world not flanker 5000, or what have you. There are strong polarities in this community at large , and in the macro. I'm a polarizing figure, so in saying that don't take my seldom rhetoric vitriol in anything but a metaphorical context ever, it's literally what I'm good for and why I have a roof over my head. Good morning

Nah, I don't think most people in multiplayer would see that jet modeled right cruising in quiet at 35 k jenking in. If it had a raptor fc3 style watching it's back? Read the thread title. The reacts so strong, got about as deep as a puddle 100 dollars take my money ed

and for transparency and honesty of documentation I am playing steam install, so Whatever it may be is more than likely, err... pronounced.

the "problem" i observe is during that "flashing state"... it seems like, when its flashing I try to CCRP, it CCIP's anyway, and when I want to CCRP, i put the bomb reticle on the area of intent and hold down the function key and it just launches. sometimes, I'd say 40% of the time, it works as I expected it. I've only been flying this simulator for about 2 months, so I'm just going off of expected behavior from training and from what other pilots are saying to me. It is, at best, consistently inconsistent in a way that perhaps you've become accustomed to. It could simply be "quirky" in a sense I have yet to percieve. I thank you for your response and efforts in this matter, as I found great frustration, and to your point, whatever I am experiencing is tenfold over water. almost to the point of being impractical. Seemed to be synchronized with the radar alternating from "r" to larger increments. I apologize if my descriptors sometime fall short as I still feel like I am grasping in the dark at times.

And I did test the 33 as well- it is by far, worse.