proletariat23

This is just a suggestion, from my experience but the problem seems to be coming from the control architecture . For instance, the pickle reticle sometimes "hiccups" flashing, never giving you launch authorization or flashing . Now weapon selection seems to matter too. The result is that sometimes you intend to designate for CCRP and you just pickle like 4 miles away. Sometimes you go to bomb CCIP off a high g dive and it just mocks you with the diamond, you scramble to fix it and release every weapon you had. The simple fix, is to in ground mode , change the CCRP designation button from fire weapon, to target lock. The su family doesn't have a pickle command or a second trooper detente , so many functions fighting on one trigger. It might not be sim quality but it's a small change for functionality. I am trying to master the su 27 ground attack. There is pilot error, poor gunnery, and there is fighting clunky controls. This is fighting clunky functions. In the su family, on the stick, there is a two way switch, which is used for the toggle of this mode. Even that would be better than this triple trigger function which seems to fight its nature .

You have to guess that with the current state of carrier operations a lot of the timeframe for the hornet is just that

B29, with multiplayer gunners over noobmandy anyone?

Sorry, did not mean to posture confrontationally. I will hot seat a day light f16 idf raid, just as quick as I would pay for ANY somewhat accurate representation of a stealth sim. I mean, I think maybe you're undervaluing being invisible, but again only my opinion.

Our oui mon ami

Just what it says. What you're missing for some people is engagement. Pick an aircraft, hire a writer, and put him into a scenario where you are number 4 in a 4 flight, the replacement, and you're in the ropes. Right now it's all click this, click that, which is great- fly here kill that. But beyond that what is he motivation? Is a simulator immersive enough that no effort could or SHOULD be made to suspend the psyche? The personal disbelief? We know most of us, that this will be the only fighter we fly, but there is potential to increase the dramatic range of the product. You've spent so many hours doing what is uncommon, simulation games in high fidelity , it makes sense to maximize the appeal, to do what is common in media and creative fields: Tell a story. Just my two cents. With the current roster, you have many avenues; HOWEVER, with the approach of aircraft that are DEEPLY ENTRENCHED IN BOTH CINEMA AND AVIATION HISTROY, I implore you to consider the potential. You may just accidentally create an entirely new genre, by accident.

Without the nighthawks, aerial attrition would be devastating. It only had a place in infiltration bombing, at night, in that late desert storm kind of threat environment. Today, they are used for surgical strikes on threat airspace , which against insurgencies isn't that needed. But in Iraq, and any modern airspace you need them, for at least 12 hours. I think it would be unique, and offer a piece of aviation history that has never been modeled, and despite what you say in your opinion, is factually a hue tactical game changer. I really can't believe how crass and dismissive some people are being about the f117, simply because it's not a supersonic turn fighter. You're right it's one of the first stealth tactical aircraft, and it entirely revolutionized our threat and aerial doctrine. Also, simpletons thought it was aliens when it was in skunk at nellis and groom. Lol. That alone is awesome, testing scenarios and radars of the domestic historical airspace, set in the late and mid 80s.

That cockpit is sexy. I just really love this whole experience, buildings a chair and Vr is the culmination of a life long live affair with aviation, astrophysics, and aerial combat history. Just can't get enough. Dcs world, world. I'm gonna gnaw on the bone till the tomcat and the hornet, the harrier, we'll get a viper, Hormuz, Vietnam, the Levantine. Desert storm, eventually. So tasty.

Just as it reads: shot down wingman in f-15 crash , blow up Toyota in a10 crash. Thought it was obvious so have not reported, last night on mission gun killed f16 which fell on top of civilian traffic, crash. Last straw. Good luck

Post when home later I'll edit here

You can buy actual stick assemblies from toncats in eBay for like 60 bucks. I'm sure they could be rigged up. If I were thrustmaster I'd just eBay and then refurb and sell them to us for 500.

I'd love a tomcat style stick, with a sliding toggle selector. Great balls of fire goose

and to think, it's basically built with 4+ and 5g tech, and we've had the 6th and 7g concepts in skunk since the early to mid 80's... Have fun sa 5000.

i like the 16000 thrustmaster HOTAS I'm using big time, I modify button 4 on the thumb of the stick, and buttons 2 and 11 of the throttle, the result is 8 different 8 way hats, 8 two wayhats, and if you are familiar with music and cable networking or chaining, this set up basically affords you three different "bays" for 1 way buttons. And this is all on the hands, not using any of those base buttons on the stick.

that sounds like much fun, I'm kind of a weird ****ing dude, and I work in creative fields. I do get the bug and stay up till 5am more often then I'll admit to the terrestrially fixated.

I'm really close to a boeing defense guy, and my uncle works at nellis, I also live close. If I can be of any assistance to Moscow, just toot my horn. I work in IP and creative consulting, have written and produced to some extent in the past. I'm you're guy on the ground in LA, let me know.

I'd like to know where you're all at with this philosophy? Is it a "don't do it unless its right"? Because they will never declassify some of the P.bombing systems . Is it a matter of getting working airframes modeled right? They've put model values into simulators before , outside of military control. The big hold up is the ACM ability right? That's what is classified ? That's the faux pais? Just like the "mig-28" in top gun right? It's politics? I'd spend 100 dollars on a flaming cliffs style pack of the f117 , the jsf, or the raptor. Chances are because of acceleration affecting the lower lobes, the raptor will be in and out by 2040. Just day dreaming ...

Always below 280 kph, I watched the sukhoi documentary and the soviet pilot Sergei brevokin says "is plane, not race car." I never forgot that. I overwrote the track file with the nose wheelie death on accident trying to export it and watch it . Boo

Exactly . You can't put it under a modified usage either. Thanks for your help, I have some insecurity still when writing in English even though I've been here since I was a child I feel like I use too many words .

Well said good sir- I have all three installs, im training my brother in the F15c and he gets impatient when I tell him to start rooting around in system folders, but I do hear you repeating yourself sir, I'm tracking . Thanks for all your help.

Elaborate on a steam install. This method from users saved games is not working at all!!!

Zoom functions do not work in oculus cv1, only vr zoom but currently bound to yo layer. Binding this overrides other controls. Would like it on my HOTAS or an axis control but devoting a non modifiable button is pretty nuclear. Do you guys understand what I mean? I'm trying to be clear.

You can only use the s in campaign right? You can't change it?

Thanks for the inspiration, I knew it was probably ambitious. Even a basic extraction mission would be great I think. I might take you up in that someday.

She's a big lady, and she needs to be trimmed. Got it. I will post a track for the lols, what you've never nollied into a fuel truck before? When I'm home I'll upload a track file. I also noticed I landed with nothing and about 500kg and she back wheelies, so I'd bet you're all right. Thank you for the responses and help, you're all top kek.