Jump to content

SacredRaziel

Members
  • Posts

    128
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SacredRaziel

  1. Just send it to the grim reaper channel. Your message will surely reach him. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  2. But your pedals are working for the a10? Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  3. I Think you can tell him to stop talking entirely for the duration of your refueling via the jester -utility menu. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  4. Those are the best comments. Could you elaborate? Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  5. If they work on both versions, e.g. no change in the me, you should be able to copy them over without downloads Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  6. Might wannabe go ob all the way. The rare occasions when ob is entirely broken you might have to revert but in general it's not too bad. At least if you have more than one module you can fall back to if the other one is borked Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  7. You should have approach charts in your knee board (rightshift+k) on those the true bearing, runway length, ils/tacan frequency If available should be visible Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  8. Did read, still the same relation. From the easy task to the hard one. Regular ops prior to carrier ops. Formation prior to aar. From the easy task to the hard one. Different field though. And @flaming squirrel I was not talking about the means with wich we learn but the content that is learned. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  9. Thats why you first learn formation flying before you turn to aar refuel. Same relation. What's being asked for here is more like flying close to the ground counts as a landing Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  10. Ofc they don't just toss those guys in a plane and let them try. That's what simulators are for. You can be sure though there won't be an easy mode. If you learn it wrong you don't really need to bother. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  11. Ofc it's been covered. But the wishlist is afaik not just an idea dump but a platform for discussion aswell to provide ed with enough opinions from the community to decide if it's worth it or not. The amount of posts in this particular thread shows, that there are different opinions and I am just tossing one in aswell hoping that the implementation of a feature as desired by the op is, if at all, at the very bottom of the priority list. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  12. I don't really see your point there. Ofc newcomers should not be overchallanged. But a simulation certainly requires some level of practice. Expecting be able to do everything from the beginning negates the purpose of a simulation. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  13. So you would rather let the devs spend precious time on a new feature instead of telling your friends you are unable to aar so that they can adjust the mission by either adding a airfield to refuel or tick the infinit fuel checkbox... Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  14. I was lurking since bs1 until my occupation started to bore me to death... ;) Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  15. You must be new here [emoji1787] Release dates are rare and I am sure you won't miss information when more than "we are working on/ we are planning" is available Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  16. As far as I understand the viggen, the qfe is not necessary for the weapon itself but the hud with the exception of the bk90. Best example is low level high drag bombing. If you set qfe 100m agl, fly at 30m though the pipper will likely disappear cause you are underground for the ck37. Specifically for the bk90: It is a glide dispenser able to maneuver. No propulsion though. There for you can be off course a bit at the cost of reducing the range hampering the standoff capability. Not suggested. Don't have the documentation at hand but I am pretty confident what I said is right Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  17. Ahh... sorry misread that. Disregard my last post then. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  18. Yes. It is the standard setting for me with my 2 stage trigger. Stage 1 is cover and stage 2 is weapon release. Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  19. That is achievable with makro's. Not sure about software solutions but many gaming peripherals support it. Additionally there are mfds or the frames at least that you can buy and use. On a personal note: I am not a fan of the whole idea to make it easier. This ain't smash bros ;) Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk Edit: I don't know of anything that would be necessary during combat. Prepare for the fight ahead and you should be good
  20. The qfe setting is not in steps, but like a slider. The left one might be at 1012,5 and the right one at 1012,2 for example Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  21. +1 For the whole fanboy stuff mentioned above. It's great. To answer your question a lot of servers have ground commander slots in which you can see enemy ground units in visual range of friendly units. If that is not the case you still have some autogenerated cartridges which you can modify for ingress or generate new ones based on elint missions Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  22. Only in pods for both. Don't have time for an explanation though. Might wanna consult the manual or chucks guide Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  23. For the kneeboard? Gesendet von meinem SM-G960F mit Tapatalk
  24. But there are already two easy options. Infinite fuel and airfields. Seriously though I don't quiet understand the whole fuss. Either you are into the realism and see your capability for aar as necessity or you don't. For the latter you have alternatives to practicing something you don't like/don't have the time for. The cost/benefit equation from the dev side seems out of balance for me. Edit: I would prefer to see that energy put into servers and finalization of modules and such
  25. The very core of my statement was just that I, as part of the mp community, don't want to be used by Daniel to push his agenda. I am sure he is not alone but he does not speak for all of us. In fact he is speaking solely for himself. Just a quick reminder. Gesendet von meinem SM-G935F mit Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...