jamespejam

:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup: I can only agree to what Mr. Zanovello said above, being on the absolute other end of the thing, not even seing one MB-339 on real life yet, the only opportunity I could have was to fly the digital bytes wings mad by you guys, and had tons of fun over last weekend with this one, your work has absolutelly amazed me. Even made my wife try to fly the bird and smoke some ground targets (she did quite a decend job by the way being such a super stable machine and easy to fly, a born trainer). One can feel the attention and care spent on this project, on how the panel works and how it flies and reacts beautifully to every input. You guys just raised the bar for the DCS Engine Fligh Model, even with the known limitations of it (the lack of stall for example). I have experienced a couple of issues that might be related to my lack of knowledge of the module. I assume they have being adressed already either in english or italian, but I am still trying to find the correct answers (most of them could be corrected by a manual if available, or a list on the first page with the common mistakes): Flaps up/down binding & not working by clicking Sensitive AOA during take off and landing (bang noise followed by damage). Is it like the real thing? Maybe related to my flap issue? Animations a bit rough Smoke not working (only for members feature?) No indication on panel of open airbrake Back seat POV too close to the panel Ordnance Fuel gauge turns to 0 on the fuselage tank mid flight even with fuel on it ICE warning when flying at high altitudes / Pitot heat knob not working User manual (at least with table of speeds and target bug values for each payload, activation sequences) Update the download link on the first message of this tread HOW TO DONATE! **found this user manual: https://issuu.com/giuseppedidiano/docs/mb339_user_manual Thank you guys for this AMAZING work.

No interior, couldn´t spot much evolution from past months either.. looks like it´s not in the top of the priority list for Razbam, unfortunatelly.. That´s the only module in development that I would put my money on currently. Will have to wait a couple of years to see it coming to life I guess.

Really nice video, in some places it reminds me the Nevada map. Unfortunatelly it looks like we are still years away from being able to fire the A-29B guns in DCS...:( It looks like we will have to wait for the Mig-19, Mig-23 and whatever else that is on Razbam´s pipeline...:cry: Do we know at least which variant (from which country) we would have? Will the rear seat have any function?

Sad to know about that... for the last months there was no real advance published since some 3D modeling still back in august..

:cry::cry::cry::cry: Thank you very much for your help with the A-4 project. It´s really something amazing how the team put it through only for the sake of contributing for the comunitty. I Hope your example inspire more projects with this level of quality. I am myself a Design Engineer for the Automotive industry and am considering to learn how to create 3D models for DCS. It´s terrible to know that the A-1, a badass looking aircraft that would be a really nice asset to the DCS. I hope that this does not throw the project away, and you or someone else would take the mission over. Thank you and good luck in the new challenges.:thumbup:

YES! I would basically buy any COIN aircraft and am sure that the ALMIGHTY Pucará would be a really nice addition to the Falkland Scenario, and I think it is a must have aircraft even if only as AI. BUT I think it´s sales would be kind of jeopardized by the A-29 (I guess something similar happens to the jet trainers L-39 / C-101 / Hawk T1), since the Tucano can do much more and found greater military sucess in the airforces around the globe. I don´t get the point discussing which aircraft would one prefer rather than the ALMIGHTY ONE.

Hey guys, just got to know about this project and feeling already hyped for this one! Keep up the good work. Would not mind to donate for such a nice project too!

I am into DCS for a couple of years, but feeling absolutelly stupid that there are some nice MODs going on outside of the licensed 3rd party developpers that I was not aware of! Got to this post after a brief discussion at the Razbam Forum and am both excited that the A-1 is being developed but also frustrated that the last update was back in 2016.. is the project dead or just "on hold"?

I think the T-6 would be a strong addition to the DCS, coming along with the Yak-52, hopefully with a nice sound package that could match the original beast and it would have my money:D

I could pay for this one already :megalol::megalol: The question is: When could we expect to have our hands on the early version? 2018 is already gone I guess.. but would it come out sometime during 2019?:pilotfly:

Mirage IIIE is the sexier daughter of the Dassault family

PRetty much the only info I found about it;

That´s just great, I wonder how long it still will take till we can fly this mean machine! By the way, I´ve seen the Super Tucano a couple of times, but have neve seen this speed brake underneath the plane, searched for pictures and videos of landings and also never saw it being deployed.. Wouldnt it be blocket for the centre external fuel, or even loose it´s effectiveness if something is attached to the centre pilon?

I´m absolutely into COIN aircraft, and would DEFINITELY buy an O2-Skymaster from Razbam. But if we are talking about this category of airplane, i would prefer an OV-10 or the ALMIGHTY Pucará!

It´s amazing the level of detail the current models have, they will make the flaming cliffs or the Su-25T look like Nintendo 64 stuff What´s that door on the second picture? Some acess panel or speed brake? Never knew this aircraft would have one

:( Sad news.. condolences to the family, colleagues and friends

Pucará confirmed! :megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol:

Razbam is pushing the Super Tucano forward; The right side light spot is also visible here: While the interior still does not show any progress yet, the exterior seems pretty much good to go from my point of view, for brake pads, arresting loops and antennas are there;

Your mustache was not long enough to work as the standard A1's mud guard :-D

Just to add some mess on the discussion. One of my all-time favorite: P-40 Simple and a do-it-all during the first stages of the war, yet still one of the best looking aircraft of all time :thumbup:

I dont really get why the Mig-19 stands in front of the Super Tucano in the line. The only glory of the Mig was a flop from the F-4 (the lack of cannons in it´s early versions), but as a attack aircraft lover myself, I am suspect to say. I guess I´ll keep my fingers crossed through the whole year.

Or the nicest oil sprayer ever: Antonov 2

The plane that makes anyone grow a mustache: A1-Skyraider (bubble canopy!)

It also happens to me. I have to end the mission or fly without the airspeed indicator, having to guess the speed, not so realistic... The airspeed alarm and the Angle of Attack Indexer still works however. Anoying bug!

Fully hyped for this one.. I'd love to use this bird in attack missions in the new version of the Caucasus Map and also in the short landing strips of the Normandy map. The Nevada app also fits for the counter-insurgency role in the Afghan theather. We know that Razbam is fully focused on the Mig-19 project, but is there any idea if we could get our hands on the A-29 anytime in 2018?. Would be nice to see some AI low-speed aircraft, since one of the missions of the A-29 is to intercept unauthorized flight / smugglers suspect flights (Some Cessna 152 / 172 / 180). For this mission, the A-29 has a spotlight on the right nose fuselage, so the suspect aircraft can be identified during the night; For the USAF/Afghanistan, however, this hole seems to be concealed: